CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 295Schizophrenia research and treatmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of cognitive behaviour therapy for worry on persecutory delusions in patients with psychosis (WIT): a parallel, single-blind, randomised controlled trial with a mediation analysis.

Open access
Freeman, Daniel, Dunn, Graham, Startup, Helen, Pugh, Katherine, Cordwell, Jacinta, Mander, Helen, Černis, Emma, Wingham, Gail, Shirvell, Katherine, Kingdon, David·2015·The Lancet Psychiatry
DOI 10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00039-5PMC PMC4698664
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Worry might be a contributory causal factor in the occurrence of persecutory delusions in patients with psychotic disorders. Therefore we postulated that reducing worry with cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) would reduce persecutory delusions. METHODS: For our two-arm, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial (Worry Intervention Trial [WIT]), we recruited patients aged 18-65 years with persistent persecutory delusions but non-affective psychosis from two centres: the Oxford Health National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust (Oxford, UK) and the Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust (Southampton, UK). The key inclusion criteria for participants were a score of at least 3 on the Psychotic Symptoms Rating Scale (PSYRATS) denoting a current persecutory delusion; that the delusion had persisted for at least 3 months; a clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or delusional disorder; and a clinically significant level of worry. We randomly assigned (1:1) eligible patients, using a randomly permuted block procedure with variable block sizes and division by four strata, to either six sessions of worry-reduction CBT intervention done over 8 weeks added to standard care (the CBT-intervention group), or to standard care alone (the control group). The assessors were masked to patient allocations and did their assessments at week 0 (baseline), 8 weeks (end of treatment), and 24 weeks, follow-up. The primary outcomes were worry measured by the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) and delusions measured by the PSYRATS-delusion scale; we did the analyses in the intention-to-treat population, and also did a planned mediation analysis. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN Registry (number ISRCTN23197625) and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS: From Nov 1, 2011, to Sept 9, 2013, we recruited 150 eligible participants and randomly assigned 73 to the CBT intervention group, and 77 to the control group. 143 patients (95%) provided primary outcome follow-up data. Compared with standard care alone, at 8 weeks the CBT intervention significantly reduced worry (mean difference 6·35 [SE 1·56] PSWQ units, 95% CI 3·30-9·40; p<0·001) and persecutory delusions (2·08 [SE 0·73] PSYRATS units, 95% CI 0·64-3·51; p=0·005). The reductions were maintained to 24 weeks follow-up. The mediation analysis suggested that the change in worry accounted for 66% of the change in delusion. No patients died or were admitted to secure units during our study. Six suicide attempts (two in the CBT intervention group, and four in the control group) and two serious violent incidents (one in each group) were noted, but no adverse events were deemed related to the treatments or the assessments. INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this is the first large trial focused on persecutory delusions. We have shown that long-standing delusions were significantly reduced by a brief intervention targeted on worry, although the limitations for our study include no determination of the key elements within the intervention. Our results suggest that worry might cause paranoia, and that worry intervention techniques might be a beneficial addition to the standard treatment of psychosis. FUNDING: Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme, which is a UK Medical Research Council and National Institute of Health Research partnership.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00039-5

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Trial profile PSWQ=Penn State Worry Questionnaire. CBT=cognitive behavioural therapy.
Figure 1 Trial profile PSWQ=Penn State Worry Questionnaire. CBT=cognitive behavioural therapy.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Mediation analysis Rectangles or squares represent measured variables. Ellipses or circles represent latent variables (including random errors or residuals). Single headed arrows represent predisposing effects; bold arrows represent main ones of interest. Double-headed arrows represent correlations. W8=worry measures at 8 weeks. W24=worry measures at 24 weeks. D8=delusion measures at 8 weeks. D24=delusion measures at 24 weeks. e1 and e2=random residuals (worry). e3 and e4=random residuals (delusions).
Figure 2 Mediation analysis Rectangles or squares represent measured variables. Ellipses or circles represent latent variables (including random errors or residuals). Single headed arrows represent predisposing effects; bold arrows represent main ones of interest. Double-headed arrows represent correlations. W8=worry measures at 8 weeks. W24=worry measures at 24 weeks. D8=delusion measures at 8 weeks. D24=delusion measures at 24 weeks. e1 and e2=random residuals (worry). e3 and e4=random residuals (delusions).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 294

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Freeman, D., Dunn, G., Startup, H., Pugh, K., Cordwell, J., Mander, H., Černis, E., Wingham, G., Shirvell, K., & Kingdon, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Freeman, Daniel
ORCID
Venue
The Lancet Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
305-313
ISSN
2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00039-5
PMC
PMC4698664
OpenAlex
W2135509506
Cited by
295
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 13
FWCI
28.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • UK MRC Senior Clinical Fellowship (G0902308)
  • MRC (MR/K006185/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, worry reduction, persecutory delusions, psychosis, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorder, Penn State Worry Questionnaire, mediation analysis, medication adherence, relapse prevention, relapse prevention training
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Delusions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Paranoid Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenia, Paranoid, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Single-Blind Method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review