Cited by 15Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and Patient InvolvementMental Health Treatment and Access

Fear of illness recurrence and mental health anxiety in people recovering from psychosis and common mental health problems

Open access
Jamalamadaka, Taruna, Griffith, Emma, Steer, Hannah, Salkovskis, Paul·2020·British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Objectives: It is well known that mental health problems can recur even after effective treatment, leading to an understandable fear of illness recurrence (FIR) and mental health anxiety (MHA). These may themselves contribute to the process of relapse. This study aims to examine whether people recovering from psychosis have greater FIR than those recovering from common mental health problems or healthy controls. The study also hypothesized that there will be a relationship between FIR and MHA and that both these constructs will be associated with maladaptive coping behaviours. Finally, the relationship between mental defeat with FIR and psychological distress (anxiety and depression) will be examined. Method: A cross‐sectional questionnaire design was employed. Thirty‐nine participants in recovery from psychosis, eighty‐two in recovery from other mental health difficulties, and sixty‐one healthy controls aged 18–73 were recruited from NHS services and via social media. Self‐report questionnaires measured mental defeat, mental health anxiety, fear of illness recurrence, maladaptive coping behaviours, and psychological distress. Results: Those recovering from psychosis were found to more negatively evaluate the likely consequences of relapse than those recovering from common mental health problems or healthy controls. However, the levels of FIR in common mental health problems were also significantly elevated when compared to healthy controls. There were no other differences between these groups (in terms of mental defeat, anxiety, depression, social functioning, and maladaptive coping behaviours). The hypothesized relationship between FIR and MHA was also found, and both were associated with maladaptive coping behaviours. Mental defeat was associated with FIR and psychological distress (anxiety and depression). Conclusions: This study found that those with psychosis experienced higher FIR than those with common mental health problems. Furthermore, people defining themselves as in recovery are worried about relapse and the extent of this is linked to mental health anxiety. Given that such responses may contribute to actual relapse, it is important that these issues are better understood and interventions developed to ameliorate them. Practitioner points: Following recovery, fear of relapse may be particularly high in those with experience of psychosis; it is also present in those with common mental health problems The importance of this observation lies in the issue that anxiety about relapse may initiate a self‐fulfilling process, with increased anxiety worsening symptoms and vice versa. Cognitive‐behavioural therapy for health anxiety may be beneficial to those experiencing high levels of mental health anxiety. Cognitions related to relapse need to be explored and addressed both in further research and, when clearly identified, may be a target during relapse‐prevention planning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjc.12253

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of psychotic disorders have reported that FIR significantly predicted future relapse and was associated with increased positive psychotic symptoms, depression, anxiety, and greater use of maladaptive coping strategies.

    “Studies of psychotic disorders have reported that FIR significantly predicted future relapse and was associated with increased positive psychotic symptoms, depression, anxiety, and greater use of maladaptive coping strategies (e.g., reassurance seeking) [21, 22].”

    From Fear of depression recurrence among individuals with remitted depression: a qualitative interview study (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Background reports that prior research found FIR predicted actual relapse in psychosis, and the Results (Regression analyses) link FIR to maladaptive coping; the Discussion specifically mentions reassurance seeking. The Discussion also reports earlier links with depression and anxiety, but this paper’s own regression found FIR did not significantly predict psychological distress. No passage found supports an association with increased positive psychotic symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Coakes, S. J., Steed, L. G., & Dzidic, P. (2006). SPSS version 12.0 for windows: Analysis without anguish. Milton, Qld: John Wiley & Sons Australia.
  2. Gumley, A., & MacBeth, A. (2006). A trauma‐based model of relapse in psychosis In Larkin W. & Morrison A. (Eds.), Trauma and psychosis: New directions for theory and therapy (pp. 283– 304). London, UK: Routledge.
  3. Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (versions 10 and 11): SPSS student version 11.0 for windows. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jamalamadaka, T., Griffith, E., Steer, H., & Salkovskis, P.
Affiliations
  • Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust (GB)
  • Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Jamalamadaka, Taruna
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-06-04
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
403-423
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
OpenAlex
W3033705365
Cited by
15
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
recovery from psychosis, common mental disorders, relapse, mental defeat, maladaptive coping, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, relapse prevention
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Psychotic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Recurrence, Case-Control Studies, Illness Behavior, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review