Cited by 44Digitalization, Law, and RegulationEthics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence in Law

Regulating AI and Robotics: Ethical and Legal Challenges

Ebers, Martin·2020·Algorithms and Law

Abstract

Rapid progress in AI and robotics is challenging the traditional boundaries of law. Algorithms are widely employed to make decisions that have an increasingly far-reaching impact on individuals and society, potentially leading to manipulation, biases, censorship, social discrimination, violations of privacy and property rights, and more. This has sparked a global debate on how to regulate AI and robotics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/9781108347846.003

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Harmful outcomes may involve developers, software providers, deployers, or other actors simultaneously, without a clear mechanism for allocating responsibility internally among them.

    “Harmful outcomes may involve developers, software providers, deployers, or other actors simultaneously, without a clear mechanism for allocating responsibility internally among them (Wendehorst 2020; Buiten 2024; Ebers 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ebers, M.
Affiliations
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Ebers, Martin
Venue
Algorithms and Law
Published
2020-07-31
Pages
37-99
OpenAlex
W3040609278
Cited by
44
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
60.85
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Artificial Intelligence in Law
Keywords
AI regulation, robotics regulation, algorithmic decision-making, algorithmic bias, algorithmic manipulation, censorship, social discrimination, privacy violations, property rights, law and technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review