The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Truth and Truthmakers
Abstract
Truths are determined not by what we believe, but by the way the world is. Or so realists about truth believe. Philosophers call such theories correspondence theories of truth. Truthmaking theory, which now has many adherents among contemporary philosophers, is a recent development of a realist theory of truth, and in this book, first published in 2004, D. M. Armstrong offers the first full-length study of this theory. He examines its applications to different sorts of truth, including contingent truths, modal truths, truths about the past and the future, and mathematical truths. In a clear, even-handed and non-technical discussion he makes a compelling case for truthmaking and its importance in philosophy. His book marks a significant contribution to the debate and will be of interest to a wide range of readers working in analytical philosophy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ryle, G. (2006) · Theories of Mind · doi:10.5040/9798216413257.ch-2 · Cited by 6,809
Armstrong, D. M. (1996) · Nijhoff International Philosophy Series · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8733-4_5 · Cited by 1,971
Self-citationFraassen, B. C. V. (1989) · doi:10.1093/0198248601.001.0001 · Cited by 1,821
Armstrong, D. M. (1983) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139171700 · Cited by 1,415
Self-citationThe Ways of Paradox and Other Essays.
Bar-Hillel, Y., & Quine, W. V. (1968) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2105696 · Cited by 1,281
van Fraassen, B. C. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,279
The Collected Dialogues of Plato
Plato, H. (1962) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400835867 · Cited by 1,149
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences
Wigner, E. P. (1990) · Mathematics and Science · doi:10.1142/9789814503488_0018 · Cited by 1,135
From an Ontological Point of View
Heil, J. (2003) · doi:10.1093/0199259747.001.0001 · Cited by 888
Philosophy of mathematics: structure and ontology
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-4550 · Cited by 879
Cited by
Cameron, R. P. (2008) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-008-9223-3 · Cited by 349
The moral fixed points: new directions for moral nonnaturalism
Cuneo, T., & Shafer-Landau, R. (2014) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0277-5 · Cited by 270
Why Truthmaking Is Not a Case of Grounding
Audi, P. (2020) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.12605 · Cited by 47
Tugby, M. (2017) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1036-x · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Armstrong, D. M.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2004-05-27
- OpenAlex
- W620387456
- Cited by
- 799
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 35.53
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Truth and Truthmakers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511487552
- The paper
- Armstrong, D. M. (2004). Truth and Truthmakers. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511487552
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.