The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Race and Regionalism in the Politics of Taxation in Brazil and South Africa
Abstract
Nationally-specific definitions of citizenship proved decisive for the development of the Tax State in Brazil and South Africa in the twentieth century. Although both countries had been divided along racial and regional lines in the late nineteenth century, watershed constitutions addressed these political problems in very different ways. South Africa's institutionalized white supremacy created a level of political solidarity that contributed to the development of a highly progressive and efficient tax system. In Brazil, federalism and official non-racialism proved more divisive, making the enactment and collection of progressive taxes much more difficult. The legacy of these divergent state-building processes remains evident at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Lieberman extends this analysis to a wider group of country cases and finds similar patterns and causal relationships between the politics of race, region, and taxation. The findings are based on field research, large-scale national surveys, macroeconomic data, and various archival sources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
North, D. C. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808678 · Cited by 32,691
Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics
Pierson, P. (2000) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2586011 · Cited by 8,094
HISTORICAL INSTITUTIONALISM IN COMPARATIVE POLITICS
Thelen, K. (1999) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369 · Cited by 3,409
Political Trust and Trustworthiness
Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475 · Cited by 2,190
The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry
Skocpol, T., & Somers, M. (1980) · Comparative Studies in Society and History · doi:10.1017/s0010417500009282 · Cited by 1,074
Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe
Ertman, T. (1997) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511529016 · Cited by 988
A Democratic South Africa?: Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society
Horowitz, D. L. (1991) · doi:10.1525/9780520328884 · Cited by 689
Luebbert, G. M. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195066104.001.0001 · Cited by 491
Inclusion of Afro-Colombians: Unreachable National Goal?
Arocha, J. (1998) · Latin American Perspectives · doi:10.1177/0094582x9802500304 · Cited by 95
Davenport, T. R. H. (1991) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-21422-8 · Cited by 78
Cited by
Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research
LIEBERMAN, E. S. (2005) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055405051762 · Cited by 1,515
Self-citationMixing Methods: A Bayesian Approach
HUMPHREYS, M., & JACOBS, A. M. (2015) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055415000453 · Cited by 198
On Tax Efforts and Colonial Heritage in Africa
Mkandawire, T. (2010) · Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2010.500660 · Cited by 181
Why we need a new theory of government
Levi, M. (2006) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592706060038 · Cited by 149
Going Where the Money Is: Strategies for Taxing Economic Elites in Unequal Democracies
Fairfield, T. (2013) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.02.011 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Lieberman, E. S.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2003-09-01
- OpenAlex
- W2003866609
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 12.93
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.