The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics
Abstract
Although politics at the elite level has been polarized for some time, a scholarly controversy has raged over whether ordinary Americans are polarized. This book argues that they are and that the reason is growing polarization of worldviews - what guides people's view of right and wrong and good and evil. These differences in worldview are rooted in what Marc J. Hetherington and Jonathan D. Weiler describe as authoritarianism. They show that differences of opinion concerning the most provocative issues on the contemporary issue agenda - about race, gay marriage, illegal immigration, and the use of force to resolve security problems - reflect differences in individuals' levels of authoritarianism. Events and strategic political decisions have conspired to make all these considerations more salient. The authors demonstrate that the left and the right have coalesced around these opposing worldviews, which has provided politics with more incandescent hues than before.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Consequently, rather than being a stable trait, individuals' authoritarian tendencies may temporarily increase when threats are psychologically salient [39], [55], [56], [57].”
From Pathogens and Politics: Further Evidence That Parasite Prevalence Predicts Authoritarianism (2013) · cites this paper as [55]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 919
The Electoral Origins of Polarized Politics
Jacobson, G. C. (2012) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764212463352 · Cited by 76
What Goes with Red and Blue? Mapping Partisan and Ideological Associations in the Minds of Voters
Goggin, S. N., Henderson, J. A., & Theodoridis, A. G. (2019) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-018-09525-6 · Cited by 79
Enemy Mine: Negative Partisanship and Satisfaction with Democracy
Ridge, H. M. (2020) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09658-7 · Cited by 78
Tarrow, S. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009028905 · Cited by 101
Rensmann, L. (2017) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.v5i4.1123 · Cited by 78
Authoritarian Orientations and Political Trust in East Asian Societies
Ma, D., & Yang, F. W. (2014) · East Asia · doi:10.1007/s12140-014-9217-z · Cited by 74
Individual Differences in Group Loyalty Predict Partisan Strength
Clifford, S. (2016) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9367-3 · Cited by 76
Authoritarianism and citizen attitudes towards European integration
Tillman, E. R. (2013) · European Union Politics · doi:10.1177/1465116513483182 · Cited by 69
“Finally, I follow recent studies (e.g. Hetherington and Weiler, 2009; Stenner, 2005) by measuring authoritarianism with questions about child-rearing values that tap into fundamental attitudes (Kohn, 1977), which should be causally prior to attitudes about national identity, immigration, or…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe effect of social balance on social fragmentation
Pham, T. M., Kondor, I., Hanel, R., & Stefan Thurner, A. (2020) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2020.0752 · Cited by 74
Comments on: Authoritarianism in social context: The role of threat
Feldman, S. (2013) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00207594.2012.742196 · Cited by 67
Ethnic Change, Personality, and Polarization Over Immigration in the American Public
Johnston, C. D., Newman, B. J., & Velez, Y. R. (2015) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfv022 · Cited by 70
Who Are Conspiracy Theorists? A Comprehensive Approach to Explaining Conspiracy Beliefs
Enders, A. M., & Smallpage, S. M. (2019) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.12711 · Cited by 63
Populism and the American Party System: Opportunities and Constraints
Lee, F. E. (2019) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592719002664 · Cited by 72
“Authoritarian (Hetherington and Weiler 2009) and ethnocentric (Kinder and Kam 2009) beliefs are major drivers of public opinion.”
BackgroundAffective Polarization in Political and Nonpolitical Settings
Rudolph, T. J., & Hetherington, M. J. (2020) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edaa040 · Cited by 66
Self-citationWhen Democracy Trumps Populism
Verbeek, J. A., Zaslove, A. S., Weyland, K., & Madrid, R. L. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108692793 · Cited by 70
“I Just Don't Think She Has a Presidential Look”: Sexism and Vote Choice in the 2016 Election*
Knuckey, J. O. (2018) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.12547 · Cited by 66
Agreeable Authoritarians: Personality and Politics in Contemporary Russia
Greene, S. A., & Robertson, G. B. (2016) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414016688005 · Cited by 69
“Hetherington and Weiler (2009) resolve this issue by focusing not on political attitudes but instead on values related to child rearing, which, they argue, allow researchers to assess the degree of authoritarianism independent of politics and then make arguments connecting the two.”
Are there still limits on partisan prejudice?
Westwood, S. J., Peterson, E., & Lelkes, Y. (2019) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfz034 · Cited by 61
“Both comparisons measure affective polarization as the difference in feeling thermometer ratings of the party an individual identifies with and their rating of the other party (e.g., Hetherington and Weiler 2009; Haidt and Hetherington 2012; Mason 2015).”
BackgroundDo authoritarians vote for authoritarians? Evidence from Latin America
Cohen, M. J., & Smith, A. E. (2016) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/2053168016684066 · Cited by 62
“Because RWA conflates moral conservatism with aggression to outsiders and preference for authority (Duckitt et al., 2010; Feldman, 2003; Hetherington and Weiler, 2009), recent studies use a battery on child-rearing preferences to capture “adherence to authority” independent of conservatism (Stenner 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialFieldhouse, E., Green, J., Evans, G., Mellon, J., Prosser, C., Schmitt, H., & van der Eijk, C. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198800583.001.0001 · Cited by 206
Barker, D. C., & Carman, C. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199796564.001.0001 · Cited by 74
To Know You is Not Necessarily to Love You: The Partisan Mediators of Intergroup Contact
Dyck, J. J., & Pearson‐Merkowitz, S. (2013) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9240-6 · Cited by 58
US infant mortality and the President’s party
Rodríguez, J. M., Bound, J., & Geronimus, A. T. (2013) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyt252 · Cited by 58
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics
Patterson, M. M., Bigler, R. S., Pahlke, E. E., Brown, C. S., Hayes, A. R., Ramírez, M., & Nelson, A. (2019) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.1111/mono.12410 · Cited by 63
Authoritarianism and political choice in France
Vasilopoulos, P., & Lachat, R. (2017) · Acta Politica · doi:10.1057/s41269-017-0066-9 · Cited by 54
“…refinements, the concept is currently witnessing its second revival in the United States in the context of the increasing interdisciplinary dialogue between psychology and political science (Hetherington and Suhay 2011; Hetherington and Weiler 2009, 2015; Johnston and Wronski 2015; Stenner 2005).”
BackgroundRegaining Control? The Political Impact of Policy Responses to Refugee Crises
Solodoch, O. (2019) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818321000060 · Cited by 59
Stewart, P. A. (2011) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/0539018410396616 · Cited by 62
A Birther and a Truther: The Influence of the Authoritarian Personality on Conspiracy Beliefs
Richey, S. (2017) · Politics & Policy · doi:10.1111/polp.12206 · Cited by 55
Optimizing the Measurement of Sexism in Political Surveys
Schaffner, B. F. (2021) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2021.6 · Cited by 55
“Jackman (2008) notes, “the term ‘construct validity’ has lostmuchof the specificity it once had, and today is an umbrella term of sorts.”
BackgroundExplaining Attitudes toward Immigration: The Role of Regional Context and Individual Predispositions
Karreth, J., Singh, S. P., & Stojek, S. M. (2015) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402382.2015.1022039 · Cited by 61
“…personality theory argues that the cognitive orientations of conservatives are naturally linked to less tolerance of diversity and a general preference for social cohesion and uniformity (Altemeyer 1988; Feldman 2003; Feldman and Stenner 1997; Hetherington and Weiler 2009; Stenner 2005).”
Reconciliation-oriented leadership: Chilean President Michelle Bachelet.
Lieberfeld, D. (2011) · Peace and Conflict Journal of Peace Psychology · doi:10.1080/10781919.2011.560858 · Cited by 55
Azari, J. R., & Hetherington, M. J. (2016) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716216662604 · Cited by 55
Self-citationIntellectualism, Anti-Intellectualism, and Epistemic Hubris in Red and Blue America
Barker, D. C., DeTamble, R., & Marietta, M. (2021) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055421000988 · Cited by 75
“…ideological conservatism is associated with non-intellectual characteristics such as a “need for cognitive closure” (e.g., Kruglanski 2004), belief in conspiracy theories (Van Der Linden et al. 2020), and authoritarianism (e.g., Barker and Tinnick 2006; Haidt 2012; Hetherington and Weiler 2008).”
BackgroundTRENDS: Diploma divide: Educational attainment and the realignment of the American electorate
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129221079862 · Cited by 66
Polarization and US foreign policy: key debates and new findings
Friedrichs, G. M., & Tama, J. (2022) · International Politics · doi:10.1057/s41311-022-00381-0 · Cited by 66
Citizenship and Contemporary Direct Democracy
Altman, D. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108634397 · Cited by 63
Tolerating Threat? The Independent Effects of Civil Conflict on Domestic Political Tolerance
Hutchison, M. L. (2013) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002713478566 · Cited by 51
“Recent work links terrorist attacks to changes in individual attitudes and orientations by noting increases in ethnocentrism (Huddy et al. 2005; Kinder and Kam 2009), authoritarianism (Hetherington and Weiler 2009), and prejudice (Merolla and Zechmeister 2009).”
BackgroundLuttig, M. D. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12484 · Cited by 53
Gutting, R. (2019) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-018-09523-8 · Cited by 52
Strategies of legitimation in Central Asia: regime durability in Turkmenistan
Polese, A., Beacháin, D. Ó., & Horák, S. (2017) · Contemporary Politics · doi:10.1080/13569775.2017.1331391 · Cited by 50
“Some empirical works have focused on the durability of authoritarian rule (Hetherington & Weiler, 2009; Pratt, 2007) to highlight a number of cases where authoritarian rule survives many tests (Bellin, 2004; Magaloni, 2008) and prompts new challenges (James, 2002).”
BackgroundWhy do voters support public transportation? Public choices and private behavior
Manville, M., & Cummins, B. R. (2014) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-014-9545-2 · Cited by 49
Badaan, V., & Jost, J. T. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.007 · Cited by 46
Levendusky, M. S., & Stecula, D. A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009042192 · Cited by 56
Busby, E. C., Howat, A. J., Rothschild, J. E., & Shafranek, R. M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009086462 · Cited by 48
A Matter of Principle? On the Relationship Between Racial Resentment and Ideology
Enders, A. M. (2019) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-019-09561-w · Cited by 45
Immigration, presidential politics, and partisan polarization among the American public, 1992–2018
Baker, J. O., & Edmonds, A. E. (2021) · Sociological Spectrum · doi:10.1080/02732173.2021.1900760 · Cited by 45
The racialization of electoral fairness in the 2008 and 2012 United States presidential elections
Appleby, J., & Federico, C. M. (2017) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430217691364 · Cited by 43
“First, those on the right tend to be more threatened by social change (Jost, Federico, & Napier, 2009; Jost, Nosek, & Gosling, 2008; see also Hetherington & Weiler, 2009; Parker & Barreto, 2013).”
BackgroundElites are people, too: The effects of threat sensitivity on policymakers’ spending priorities
Arceneaux, K., Dunaway, J., & Soroka, S. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193781 · Cited by 44
Martial Law? Military Experience, International Law, and Support for Torture
Wallace, G. P. R. (2013) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/isqu.12092 · Cited by 43
Incivility and Standing Firm: A Second Layer of Partisan Division
Wolf, M. R., Strachan, J. C., & Shea, D. M. (2012) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096512000509 · Cited by 45
“A second reason may be, as Hetherington and Weiler (2009) contend, that the parties reflect contending worldviews, with Republicans who tend to prefer the social status quo and view “others” with suspicion, and Democrats who tend to embrace diversity and oppose the static social order upheld by…”
BackgroundKalkan, K. O., Layman, G. C., & Green, J. C. (2018) · Politics and Religion · doi:10.1017/s1755048318000342 · Cited by 45
“Another important variable may be authoritarianism, which is important for contemporary political behavior (Hetherington and Weiler 2009; Cizmar et al. 2013) and related to prejudiced attitudes toward minority groups (Adorno et al. 1950).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDispositional Sources of Economic Protectionism
Johnston, C. D. (2013) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nft004 · Cited by 44
“…frameworks to fully understand their antecedents, and the implications for the politics of trade. the present paper approaches protectionism within the context of recent theorizing regarding the influence of psychological dispositions on preferences (e.g., hetherington and Weiler 2009; Jost et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialEconomic Inequality and U.S. Public Policy Mood Across Space and Time
Johnston, C. D., & Newman, B. J. (2015) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x15588361 · Cited by 43
“Political affiliation, in contemporary U.S. politics, is highly cultural in content (Ellis & Stimson, 2012; Feldman & Johnston, 2014; Hetherington & Weiler, 2009), and people may cluster by affiliation because they prefer to be among and associate with others that share their broad cultural and…”
BackgroundAuthoritarianism and support for Trump in the 2016 presidential election
Knuckey, J., & Hassan, K. (2022) · The Social Science Journal · doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2019.06.008 · Cited by 43
“…suggesting that authoritarianism emerged as a salient cleavage in the American electorate that may in large measure be at the fulcrum of the partisan polarization evident in recent American politics (Cizmar, Layman, McTague, Pearson-Merkowitz, & Spivey, 2014; Hetherington & Weiler, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBarry, C. L., Anderson, K. E., Han, H. C., Presskreischer, R., & McGinty, E. E. (2021) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2020.306148 · Cited by 43
The Forum: Global Challenges to Democracy? Perspectives on Democratic Backsliding
Bartels, L. M., Daxecker, U., Hyde, S., Lindberg, S. I., & Nooruddin, I. (2023) · International Studies Review · doi:10.1093/isr/viad019 · Cited by 58
Authoritarianism Reimagined: The Riddle of Trump’s Base
Smith, D. N. (2019) · Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1080/00380253.2019.1593061 · Cited by 42
Jedinger, A., & Burger, A. M. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12627 · Cited by 39
Public Support for Civil Liberties Pre- and Post-9/11
Sullivan, J. L., & Hendriks, H. (2009) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131525 · Cited by 42
Parietti, G. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197607480.003.0005 · Cited by 42
The Dynamic Relationship between Personality Stability and Political Attitudes
Boston, J., Homola, J., Sinclair, B., Torres, M., & Tucker, P. (2018) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfy001 · Cited by 39
The fourth stage of social democracy
Frega, R. (2021) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/s11186-020-09424-y · Cited by 42
“20 For example, it is estimated that they constituted a significant share of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton supporters during the last two presidential campaigns (Hetherington and Weiler 2009, p. 6).”
BackgroundPernia, R. A. (2021) · Asian Journal of Comparative Politics · doi:10.1177/2057891121992118 · Cited by 46
“However, subsequent scholars have redefined and reconceptualized authoritarianism, developing new measurements and constructs (Altemeyer, 1996, 1998; Feldman, 2003; Hetherington and Weiler, 2009; Stenner, 2005).”
BackgroundFederico, C. M., & Tagar, M. R. (2013) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9250-4 · Cited by 40
“In this respect, authoritarianism tends to predict support for and identification with right-wing political parties, both in the United States and elsewhere (Altemeyer 1988, 1996; Hetherington and Weiler 2009).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialMotyl, M. S. (2014) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12044 · Cited by 41
International polarity and America's polarization
Bafumi, J., & Parent, J. M. (2012) · International Politics · doi:10.1057/ip.2011.34 · Cited by 41
Bartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cited by 41
The Opposite of Republican: Polarization and Political Categorization
Heit, E., & Nicholson, S. P. (2010) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01138.x · Cited by 42
Bridging Partisan Divisions over Antiterrorism Policies
Malhotra, N. A., & Popp, E. (2010) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912910385251 · Cited by 40
Bonikowski, B. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108692793.006 · Cited by 43
Ramirez, M. D., & Peterson, D. A. M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108861915 · Cited by 46
Mader, M., Gavras, K. L., Hofmann, S. C., Reifler, J., Schoen, H., & Thomson, C. P. (2023) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12605 · Cited by 49
Television and the Cultivation of Authoritarianism: A Return Visit From an Unexpected Friend
Morgan, M., & Shanahan, J. E. (2017) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12297 · Cited by 36
“Strong leaders are seen as more desirable than those who work toward consensus or compromise through democratic means (see Adorno, Frenkel-Brunswik, Levinson, & Sanford, 1950; Altemeyer, 1988; Hetherington & Weiler, 2009).”
InfluentialJost, J. T. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12567 · Cited by 36
One Language, Two Meanings: Partisanship and Responses to Spanish
Hopkins, D. J. (2014) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.894161 · Cited by 39
“Hetherington & Weiler, 2009, chapter 8) or ethnocentrism (Kinder & Kam, 2009).”
Claassen, C., & McLaren, L. M. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12720 · Cited by 38
To Unite and Divide: The Polarizing Effect of Presidential Debates
Warner, B. R., & McKinney, M. S. (2013) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2013.832341 · Cited by 37
Polarisation and Electoral Realignment: The Case of the Right-Wing Parties in Spain
Rodríguez-Teruel, J. (2020) · South European Society and Politics · doi:10.1080/13608746.2021.1901386 · Cited by 36
Wolf, M. R., Strachan, J., & Shea, D. M. (2012) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764212463355 · Cited by 35
Jost, J. T., & Sterling, J. L. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199828340-0160 · Cited by 36
Bergmann, H., Bäck, H., & Saalfeld, T. (2021) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402382.2020.1870345 · Cited by 36
Constrained Citizens? Ideological Structure and Conflict Extension in the US Electorate, 1980–2016
Hare, C. (2021) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s000712342100051x · Cited by 32
“This is an alignment that has indeed grown more pronounced in recent years (Barker and Tinnick 2006; Jacoby 2014), fostered by the rise of symbolic, value-laden “easy” issues (Carmines and Stimson 1980) on the political agenda and the use of elite rhetoric that connects core values and party positions (Clifford and Je…”
BackgroundSmith, A. E., Warming, K., & Hennings, V. M. (2016) · Politics Groups and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2016.1198707 · Cited by 33
Radical right framing of social policy in Hungary: between nationalism and populism
Lugosi, N. V. T. (2018) · Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy · doi:10.1080/21699763.2018.1483256 · Cited by 35
“…is vast, scholars do agree that authoritarians are motivated by order, deference to authority, and a simplistic ’black and white’ worldview (Adorno, Frenkel-Brunswik, Levinson, & Sanford, 1950; Altemeyer, 1988; Hetherington & Weiler, 2009; Lavine, Lodge, & Freitas, 2005; Stenner, 2005).”
BackgroundExploring the Psychological Foundations of Ideological and Social Sorting
Weber, C. R., & Klar, S. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12574 · Cited by 34
Authoritarianism, Institutional Confidence, and Willingness to Engage in Collective Action
Weiner, E., & Federico, C. M. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167216686561 · Cited by 31
“…has instead used measures of childrearing values that assesses general preferences for obedience and conformity versus independence and autonomy as important values to instill in children (Federico, Fisher, & Deason, 2011; Federico & Reifen Tagar, 2014; Hetherington & Weiler, 2009; Stenner, 2005).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialReligion and the 2020 Presidential Election: The Enduring Divide
Campbell, D. E., Kirk, J. R. G., & Layman, G. C. (2020) · The Forum · doi:10.1515/for-2020-2104 · Cited by 32
Negativity bias, personality and political ideology
Johnston, C. D., & Madson, G. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01327-5 · Cited by 36
Reifen‐Tagar, M., & Cimpian, A. (2022) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12853 · Cited by 40
Barack Obama and the nationalization of electoral politics in 2012
Jacobson, G. C. (2014) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2014.09.010 · Cited by 31
Social Class and Party Identification During the Clinton, Bush, and Obama Presidencies
Morgan, S. L., & Lee, J. (2017) · Sociological Science · doi:10.15195/v4.a16 · Cited by 29
Can Debate and Deliberation Reduce Partisan Divisions? Evidence from a Study of High School Students
McAvoy, P., & McAvoy, G. E. (2021) · Peabody Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/0161956x.2021.1942706 · Cited by 30
From Coalition to Constraint: Modes of Thought in Contemporary American Conservatism
Perrin, A. J., Roos, J. M., & Gauchat, G. (2014) · Sociological Forum · doi:10.1111/socf.12084 · Cited by 31
Rossetti, F., Abts, K., Meuleman, B., & Swyngedouw, M. (2020) · Journal of Social Policy · doi:10.1017/s0047279420000197 · Cited by 32
Distinctions With a Difference: Illiberalism and Authoritarianism in Scholarly Study
Waller, J. G. (2023) · Political Studies Review · doi:10.1177/14789299231159253 · Cited by 42
Religion and Attitudes toward Redistributive Policies among Americans
McCarthy, A. F., Davis, N. T., Garand, J. C., & Olson, L. R. (2016) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912915623868 · Cited by 29
Authoritarianism, Affective Polarization, and Economic Ideology
Johnston, C. D. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12483 · Cited by 30
Percepción de las noticias falsas en universitarios de Portugal: análisis de su consumo y actitudes
Figueira, J., & Santos, S. (2019) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2019.may.15 · Cited by 30
The Circuit of Detachment in Chile
Araujo, K. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009310697 · Cited by 29
Shen, M. J., & LaBouff, J. P. (2016) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v4i2.245 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Hetherington, M. J., & Weiler, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2009-08-24
- OpenAlex
- W980306965
- Cited by
- 910
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 152 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 42
- FWCI
- 47.41
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Keywords
- authoritarianism, political polarization, public opinion, worldview, issue salience, race, same-sex marriage, illegal immigration, use of force, left-right divide, American politics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
