Are there still limits on partisan prejudice?
Abstract
Abstract Partisan affective polarization is believed, by some, to stem from vitriolic elite political discourse. We explore this account by replicating several 2014 studies that examine partisan prejudice. Despite claims of elevated partisan affective polarization from pundits, this extensive replication offers no evidence of an increase in the public’s partisan prejudice between 2014 and 2017. Divides in feeling thermometer ratings of the two political parties remained stable, and there was no overall increase in measures of partisan prejudice between periods. This is consistent with results from the 2012 and 2016 ANES. Moreover, the most affectively polarized members of the public became no more likely to hold prejudicial attitudes toward the other party. Despite an intervening campaign with elevated elite hostility and rampant postelection discord, the limits on partisan prejudice identified in prior research remain in place. This stability is important for understanding the nature and malleability of partisan affect.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These results are consistent with other findings that do not find evidence for increased polarization during this brief time frame.
“These results are consistent with other findings that do not find evidence for increased polarization during this brief time frame (70).”
From Troll and divide: the language of online polarization (2022) · cites this paper as [70]
Cites
(1954) · Cited by 15,935 · see citing works
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038 · Cited by 2,748 · see citing works
Mason, L. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12089 · Cited by 1,367 · see citing works
#Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media
Sunstein, C. R. (2017) · doi:10.1515/9781400884711 · Cited by 1,153 · see citing works
Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics
Hetherington, M. J., & Weiler, J. D. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802331 · Cited by 910 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Both comparisons measure affective polarization as the difference in feeling thermometer ratings of the party an individual identifies with and their rating of the other party (e.g., Hetherington and Weiler 2009; Haidt and Hetherington 2012; Mason 2015).”
BackgroundThe People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It
Mounk, Y. (2018) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674984776 · Cited by 813 · see citing works
Political homophily in social relationships: evidence from online dating behavior
Huber, G. A., & Malhotra, N. (2017) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/687533 · Cited by 664 · see citing works
(2017) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 529 · see citing works
Kalla, J., & Broockman, D. (2017) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055417000363 · Cited by 458 · see citing works
The Economic Consequences of Partisanship in a Polarized Era
McConnell, C., Margalit, Y., Malhotra, N., & Levendusky, M. (2018) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12330 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-6538 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Garrett, R. K., Gvirsman, S. D., Johnson, B. K., Tsfati, Y., Neo, R., & Dal, A. (2014) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/hcre.12028 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Fair and Balanced? Quantifying Media Bias through Crowdsourced Content Analysis
Budak, C., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfw007 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
The Limits of Partisan Prejudice
Lelkes, Y., & Westwood, S. J. (2017) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/688223 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Self-citationPartisan Media Exposure and Attitudes Toward the Opposition
Levendusky, M. (2013) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.737435 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
The Outrage Industry: Political Opinion Media and the New Incivility
Berry, J., & Sobieraj, S. (2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.186974 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
News Coverage of the 2016 General Election: How the Press Failed the VotersPreprint
Patterson, T. E. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2884837 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
General purpose computer-assisted clustering and conceptualization
Grimmer, J., & King, G. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1018067108 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It
Mounk, Y. (2018) · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Electoral Cycle Fluctuations in Partisanship: Global Evidence from Eighty-Six Countries
Michelitch, K. G., & Utych, S. (2018) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/694783 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Political Advertising in 2016: The Presidential Election as Outlier?
Fowler, E. F., Ridout, T. N., & Franz, M. M. (2016) · The Forum · doi:10.1515/for-2016-0040 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Coming to Dislike Your Opponents: The Polarizing Impact of Political CampaignsPreprint
Sood, G., & Iyengar, S. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2840225 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Ridout, T. N., Fowler, E. F., Franz, M. M., & Goldstein, K. M. (2017) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x17721479 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Rejection or Inclusion of Outgroups?
Jackman, M. R. (2005) · doi:10.1002/9780470773963.ch6 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How affective polarization undermines support for democratic norms
Kingzette, J., Druckman, J. N., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Levendusky, M., & Ryan, J. B. (2021) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfab029 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · doi:10.1017/9781108923323 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Polarization in America: two possible futures
Heltzel, G., & Laurin, K. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.03.008 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
The Inseparability of Race and Partisanship in the United States
Westwood, S. J., & Peterson, E. (2022) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09648-9 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Self-citationTroll and divide: the language of online polarization
Simchon, A., Brady, W. J., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2022) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac019 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Moral polarization and out-party hostility in the US political context
Tappin, B. M., & McKay, R. T. (2019) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v7i1.1090 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Who Supports Political Violence?
Armaly, M., & Enders, A. M. (2022) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592722001086 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Negative partisanship is not more prevalent than positive partisanship
Lee, A. H., Yphtach Lelkes, B., Hawkins, C. B., & Theodoridis, A. G. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01348-0 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Polarization and US foreign policy: key debates and new findings
Friedrichs, G. M., & Tama, J. (2022) · International Politics · doi:10.1057/s41311-022-00381-0 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Levendusky, M. S., & Stecula, D. A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009042192 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Myrick, R. (2022) · International Politics · doi:10.1057/s41311-022-00382-z · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Does affective polarization contribute to democratic backsliding in America?
Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., & Iyengar, S. (2023) · The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/00027162241228952 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Persistent polarization: The unexpected durability of political animosity around US elections
Fasching, N., Iyengar, S., Yphtach Lelkes, B., & Westwood, S. J. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adm9198 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Gill, H. (2022) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2022.2087653 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Screw Those Guys: Polarization, Empathy, and Attitudes About Out‐Partisans
Allamong, M. B., & Peterson, D. A. M. (2020) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12701 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
How (many) descriptive claims about political polarization exacerbate polarization
Peters, U. (2021) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.5543 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
A new measure of affective polarization
CAMPOS, N., & FEDERICO, C. (2026) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055425000255 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
The Effects of Target Characteristics on Public Support for Hate Speech LawsPreprint
Rasmussen, J. S. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/j4nuc · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Homan, P., & Lantis, J. S. (2022) · International Politics · doi:10.1057/s41311-021-00371-8 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Westwood, S. J. (2021) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09659-6 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
The Conditional Association Between Populism, Ideological Extremity, and Affective Polarization
Stefanelli, A. (2023) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edad014 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Incentivizing COVID-19 Vaccination in a Polarized and Partisan United States
Algara, C., & Simmons, D. J. (2023) · Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law · doi:10.1215/03616878-10637717 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Partisan Affective Polarization
Ársælsson, K. M. (2020) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfaa060 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Does the Salience of Partisan Competition Increase Affective Polarization in the United States?
Singh, S. P., & Thornton, J. R. (2023) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129231192943 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Friedrichs, G. M. (2022) · International Studies Review · doi:10.1093/isr/viac010 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Macková, A., Novotná, M., Čejková, L., & Hrbková, L. (2023) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2023.2202650 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Not My Problem: How Social Identity Shapes Problem Perceptions and Policy Attitudes
Moniz, P. (2025) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129251321497 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Political ViolencePreprint
Westwood, S. J., Grimmer, J., Tyler, M., & Nall, C. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/a8m3n · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Troll and Divide: The Language of Online PolarizationPreprint
Simchon, A., Brady, W. J., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/xjd64 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Sotola, L. K. (2026) · Journal of Trial and Error · doi:10.36850/d6d3-4f14 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Myrick, R. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-58618-7_13 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Partisan Cues and Public Support for Democratic Norm ViolationsPreprint
Metin, O. F., & Georgarakis, G. N. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/tyru4 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Measuring affective polarization: Matching concepts to measures
Druckman, J. N., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Levendusky, M., & Ryan, J. B. (2026) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.70152 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Skin Tone and the Moderating Effect of Partisanship on Assessments of Elected Officials of Color
Stout, C. T., Lemi, D. C., Bosworth, K., Chase, I., & Kiefer, J. (2024) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-024-09922-0 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Predictors of partisan strength and in-party affect: a scoping review
Shi, H., Wang, W., Goh, X. N., Perez, J., Dibisceglia, V., Hsin, Y. H., Schmoeckel, P., Krpan, D., & Delaney, L. D. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03974-7 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The limits of Brexit prejudice
Phillips, J. B., & Stoeckel, F. (2025) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.70037 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Unaffected polarization? Populism and affective polarization in comparative perspective
Stefanelli, A., & Silva, B. C. (2025) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.70027 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Registered report protocol: Stress testing predictive models of ideological prejudice
Thompson, J. L., Cassario, A. L., Vallabha, S., Gnall, S. A., Rice, S., Solanki, P., Carrillo, A., Brandt, M. J., & Wetherell, G. A. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0308397 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Who is it okay to punch?Preprint
Gonzalez, F. J., & McCoy, A. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/uh6bt
The Deeply Involved Are Different
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.005
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.011
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.008
A House Divided against Itself?
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.002
Subtleties of Partisan Division
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.003
(2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.012
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.006
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.004
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.010
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.009
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.013
Perceptions of the Most Sacred Duty
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.007
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108923323.001
Crisis, plunge, and recovery of public confidence ?in the police: Data from six national surveysPreprint
Kelley, J., Evans, M., & Corday, C. (2021) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/ydaru
Onishi, W. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4312536
Introduction: Polarization and America’s Role in the World
Friedrichs, G. M., & Tama, J. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-58618-7_1
Homan, P., & Lantis, J. S. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-58618-7_5
Registered report: Stress testing predictive models of ideological prejudice
Thompson, J. L., Cassario, A. L., Vallabha, S., Gnall, S. A., Rice, S., Solanki, P., Carrillo, A., Brandt, M. J., & Wetherell, G. A. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0334152
92 Affective Polarization and Public Trust in Government
Lamberth, T., & Nicholson, S. P. (2025) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783111591902-002
Ársælsson, K. M., & Yphtach Lelkes, B. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199756841-0322
Danyal, A., Bilgin, B., & Marcus, J. (2026) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.70075
Mumma, S. (2026) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-026-10138-7
Affective polarization and support for democratic principles in Israel
Hamanaka, S. (2026) · Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2026.2750935
- Authors
- Westwood, S. J., Peterson, E., & Lelkes, Y.
- Affiliations
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Westwood, Sean J
- Venue
- Public Opinion Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 584-597
- ISSN
- 0033-362X (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5331
- OpenAlex
- W2976805348
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 38.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Public Opinion Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- feeling thermometers, replication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
