The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy
Abstract
This book is a study of ancient Greek views about 'moral luck'. It examines the fundamental ethical problem that many of the valued constituents of a well-lived life are vulnerable to factors outside a person's control, and asks how this affects our appraisal of persons and their lives. The Greeks made a profound contribution to these questions, yet neither the problems nor the Greek views of them have received the attention they deserve. This book thus recovers a central dimension of Greek thought and addresses major issues in contemporary ethical theory. One of its most original aspects is its interelated treatment of both literary and philosophical texts. In a close analysis of three tragedies, and works by Plato and Aristotle, the author argues that we cannot understand the thought of the philosophers without also investigating its relation to the literary works; and that the literary works, in virtue of their form as well as their content, make a distinctive contribution to ethical thought.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/231294 · Cited by 6,165
Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556659 · Cited by 5,130
Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (2008) · European Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1017/s0003975609000150 · Cited by 1,265
Why Fiction May be Twice as True as Fact: Fiction as Cognitive and Emotional Simulation
Oatley, K. (1999) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.3.2.101 · Cited by 585
Winch, C., Oancea, A., & Orchard, J. (2015) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/03054985.2015.1017406 · Cited by 232
Prediction of quality of life in patients with tinnitus
Erlandsson, S. I., & Hallberg, L. R.-M. (2000) · British Journal of Audiology · doi:10.3109/03005364000000114 · Cited by 163
Virtue ethics as a resource in business
Audi, R. (2012) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq201222220 · Cited by 146
Ericson, K. M., & Laibson, D. (2019) · Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations 1 · doi:10.1016/bs.hesbe.2018.12.001 · Cited by 125
Hope, attentiveness, and caring for difference: The moral voice in teaching
Elbaz, F. (1992) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/0742-051x(92)90047-7 · Cited by 104
Does reflection lead to wise choices?
Bortolotti, L. (2011) · Philosophical Explorations · doi:10.1080/13869795.2011.594962 · Cited by 49
Coeckelbergh, M. (2012) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9233-3 · Cited by 38
Beauty, goodness and education: the Arts beyond utility
Winston, J. (2006) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240600874372 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Nussbaum, M. C.
- Venue
- eYLS (Yale Law School)
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2001-01-15
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- OpenAlex
- W2026320825
- Cited by
- 927
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.