CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 264Resilience and Mental HealthPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and Trauma

Resilience and Mental Health: Challenges Across the Lifespan

·2011·Cambridge University Press eBooks
DOI 10.1017/cbo9780511994791
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Humans are remarkably resilient in the face of crises, traumas, disabilities, attachment losses and ongoing adversities. To date, most research in the field of traumatic stress has focused on neurobiological, psychological and social factors associated with trauma-related psychopathology and deficits in psychosocial functioning. Far less is known about resilience to stress and healthy adaptation to stress and trauma. This book brings together experts from a broad array of scientific fields whose research has focused on adaptive responses to stress. Each of the five sections in the book examines the relevant concepts, spanning from factors that contribute to and promote resilience, to populations and societal systems in which resilience is employed, to specific applications and contexts of resilience and interventions designed to better enhance resilience. This will be suitable for clinicians and researchers who are interested in resilience across the lifespan and in response to a wide variety of stressors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511994791

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stressful events are inherently highly emotional and can increase vulnerability to psychopathology; the ability to regulate emotions may be a critically important factor in determining stress resilience and mental wellbeing.

    “As stressful events are inherently highly emotional (Southwick et al., 2011) and can increase vulnerability to psychopathology (Grueschow et al., 2021), the ability to regulate emotions may be a critically important factor in determining stress resilience (Barzilay et al., 2020; Kaldewaij et al., 2021) and mental wellbeing (Satchit et al., 2011; Silton et al., 2020).”

    From Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Increases Mental Wellbeing and Emotion Regulation During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Synchronous Online Intervention Study (2021) · cites this paper as Southwick et al., 2011

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Published
2011-08-18
DOI
10.1017/cbo9780511994791
OpenAlex
W561856152
Cited by
264
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.68
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 20 d)
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
resilience, mental health, stress adaptation, trauma, traumatic stress, resilience interventions, attachment loss, adversity, psychosocial functioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review