Cited by 1,080Cultural Differences and ValuesSocial Representations and IdentityCultural, Psychoanalytic, and Sociopolitical Reflections

Cultural psychology – what is it?

Shweder, Richard A.·1990·Cultural Psychology

Abstract

A discipline is emerging called “cultural psychology.” It is not general psychology. It is not cross-cultural psychology. It is not psychological anthropology. It is not ethnopsychology. It is cultural psychology. And its time may have arrived, once again. While the authors in this volume were never asked to define or explicitly address the idea of a cultural psychology, several of the chapters turned out to be examples of it. They inspired this essay – which is a preliminary attempt to say, taxonomically and narratively, and briefly – what the discipline of cultural psychology was, is, and ought to be about. Ultimately it is a story of cyclical return. In the short run, however, the essay is a story of one of the pitfalls of the “cognitive revolution” of the 1960s, the failure of the cognitive revolution to develop an adequate theory of the “person,” because of the prevailing Platonism implicit in its scientific agenda. The essay is also a scouting expedition across the boundaries of some very treacherous disciplinary territories in the search to recover an important interdisciplinary identity. Cultural psychology is the study of the way cultural traditions and social practices regulate, express, transform, and permute the human psyche, resulting less in psychic unity for humankind than in ethnic divergences in mind, self, and emotion. Cultural psychology is the study of the ways subject and object, self and other, psyche and culture, person and context, figure and ground, practitioner and practice live together, require each other, and dynamically, dialectically, and jointly make each other up.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781139173728.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In this late text, Dewey comes very near the cultural psychology of the 1990s that regards the interaction between an individual and culture as the basic unit of analysis.

    “In this late text, Dewey comes very near the cultural psychology of the 1990s (Shweder 1990, Cole 1997) that regards the interaction between an individual and culture as the basic unit of analysis.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shweder, R. A.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Shweder, Richard A.
Venue
Cultural Psychology
Published
1990-01-26
Pages
1-44
OpenAlex
W1629928760
Cited by
1,080
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 55
FWCI
95.49
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural, Psychoanalytic, and Sociopolitical Reflections
Keywords
cultural psychology, cognitive revolution, theory of the person, Platonism, self and other, history of psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review