Cultural psychology – what is it?
Abstract
A discipline is emerging called “cultural psychology.” It is not general psychology. It is not cross-cultural psychology. It is not psychological anthropology. It is not ethnopsychology. It is cultural psychology. And its time may have arrived, once again. While the authors in this volume were never asked to define or explicitly address the idea of a cultural psychology, several of the chapters turned out to be examples of it. They inspired this essay – which is a preliminary attempt to say, taxonomically and narratively, and briefly – what the discipline of cultural psychology was, is, and ought to be about. Ultimately it is a story of cyclical return. In the short run, however, the essay is a story of one of the pitfalls of the “cognitive revolution” of the 1960s, the failure of the cognitive revolution to develop an adequate theory of the “person,” because of the prevailing Platonism implicit in its scientific agenda. The essay is also a scouting expedition across the boundaries of some very treacherous disciplinary territories in the search to recover an important interdisciplinary identity. Cultural psychology is the study of the way cultural traditions and social practices regulate, express, transform, and permute the human psyche, resulting less in psychic unity for humankind than in ethnic divergences in mind, self, and emotion. Cultural psychology is the study of the ways subject and object, self and other, psyche and culture, person and context, figure and ground, practitioner and practice live together, require each other, and dynamically, dialectically, and jointly make each other up.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In this late text, Dewey comes very near the cultural psychology of the 1990s that regards the interaction between an individual and culture as the basic unit of analysis.
“In this late text, Dewey comes very near the cultural psychology of the 1990s (Shweder 1990, Cole 1997) that regards the interaction between an individual and culture as the basic unit of analysis.”
From The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey's theory of reflective thought and action (2000) · cites this paper as Shweder 1990
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995 · see citing works
Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?
Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.106.4.766 · Cited by 2,247 · see citing works
The Meaning Maintenance Model: On the Coherence of Social Motivations
Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_1 · Cited by 1,437 · see citing works
Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity: A cultural analysis
Kim, H., & Markus, H. R. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.785 · Cited by 1,216 · see citing works
The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey's theory of reflective thought and action
Miettinen, R. (2000) · International Journal of Lifelong Education · doi:10.1080/026013700293458 · Cited by 658 · see citing works
You Can't Always Get What You Want: Educational Attainment, Agency, and Choice.
Snibbe, A. C., & Markus, H. R. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.703 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
Cohen, A. B. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0015308 · Cited by 589 · see citing works
Self as Cultural Product: An Examination of East Asian and North American Selves
Heine, S. J. (2001) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/1467-6494.696168 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
Barrett, L. F. (2012) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0027555 · Cited by 503 · see citing works
Kitayama, S. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.89 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Atzil, S., Gao, W., Fradkin, I., & Barrett, L. F. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0384-6 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Decolonizing Psychological Science: Introduction to the Special Thematic Section
Adams, G., Dobles, I., Gómez, L. H., Kurtiş, T., & Molina, L. E. (2015) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v3i1.564 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Zou, X., Tam, K.-P., Morris, M. W., Lee, S.-L., Lau, I. Y.-M., & Chiu, C.-Y. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016399 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shweder, R. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shweder, Richard A.
- ORCID
- Shweder, Richard A.
- Venue
- Cultural Psychology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1990-01-26
- Pages
- 1-44
- OpenAlex
- W1629928760
- Cited by
- 1,080
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 95.49
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural, Psychoanalytic, and Sociopolitical Reflections
- Keywords
- cultural psychology, cognitive revolution, theory of the person, Platonism, self and other, history of psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review