Cited by 6Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchDisaster Response and ManagementCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Media Contact and Posttraumatic Stress in Employees of New York City Area Businesses after the September 11 Attacks

Pfefferbaum, Betty, Palka, Jayme, North, Carol S.·2022·Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine associations between media contact and posttraumatic stress in a sample with a large number of individuals who were directly exposed to the September 11, 2001 (9/11) attacks and to compare outcomes in exposed and unexposed participants. METHODS: Structured interviews and questionnaires were administered to a volunteer sample of 254 employees of New York City businesses 35 months after the attacks to document disaster trauma exposures, posttraumatic stress outcomes, and media contact and reactions. RESULTS: Media variables were not associated with psychopathological outcomes in exposed participants, but media contact in the first week after the attacks and feeling moderately/extremely bothered by graphic 9/11 media images were associated with re-experiencing symptoms in both the exposed and unexposed participants. Feeling moderately/extremely bothered by graphic media images was associated with hyperarousal symptoms in exposed participants. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that media contact did not lead to psychopathology in exposed individuals, although it was associated with normative distress in both exposure groups. Because of the potential for adverse effects associated with media contact, clinicians and public health professionals are encouraged to discuss concerns about mass trauma media contact with their patients and the public at large.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/dmp.2020.227

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfefferbaum, B., Palka, J., & North, C. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Pfefferbaum, Betty
Venue
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
Published
2020-09-08
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
163-169
ISSN
  • 1935-7893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-744X
OpenAlex
W3083986774
Cited by
6
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
September 11 attacks, post-traumatic stress disorder, media contact, re-experiencing symptoms, hyperarousal, company employees, New York City
MeSH terms
Humans, Mass Media, New York City, Psychopathology, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Terrorism, September 11 Terrorist Attacks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review