Cited by 256Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMigration, Health and TraumaChild Abuse and Trauma

Partial PTSD versus full PTSD: an empirical examination of associated impairment

BRESLAU, NAOMI, LUCIA, VICTORIA C., DAVIS, GLENN C.·2004·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background. Partial PTSD, employed initially in relation to Vietnam veterans, has been recently extended to civilian victims of trauma. We examined the extent to which partial PTSD is distinguishable from full DSM-PTSD with respect to level of impairment. Method. A representative sample of 2181 persons was interviewed by telephone to record lifetime traumatic events and to assess DSM-IV PTSD criteria. Partial PTSD was defined as [ges ]1 symptom in each of three symptom groups (criteria B, C and D) and duration of [ges ]1 month. Impairment in persons with PTSD and partial PTSD was measured by number of work-related and personal disability days during the 30-day period when the respondent was most upset by the trauma. Results. Compared to exposed persons with neither PTSD nor partial PTSD, increment in work-loss days associated with PTSD was 11·4 ( S . E .=0·6) days and with partial PTSD, 3·3 ( S . E .=0·4) days (adjusted for sex, education and employment). Similar disparities were found across other impairment indicators. Persons who fell short of PTSD criteria by one symptom of avoidance and numbing reported an increment of 5·0 ( S . E .=0·7) work-loss days, 6·0 fewer than full PTSD. PTSD was associated with excess impairment, controlling for number of symptoms. A significantly lower proportion of persons with partial PTSD than full PTSD experienced symptoms for more than 2 years. A lower proportion of persons with partial PTSD than full PTSD had an etiologic event of high magnitude. Conclusions. PTSD identifies the most severe trauma victims, who are markedly distinguishable from victims with subthreshold PTSD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291704002594

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BRESLAU, N., LUCIA, V. C., & DAVIS, G. C.
Affiliations
Henry Ford Health (US)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2004-10
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
1205-1214
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W1975726567
Cited by
256
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH048802, MH-48802)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
subthreshold PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder, functional disability, work disability, trauma exposure, symptom severity, Vietnam War veterans
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Adolescent, Adult, Diagnosis, Differential, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Occupational Diseases, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review