Cited by 9Philosophy and History of SciencePhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceEmbodied and Extended Cognition

Individuating Cognitive Characters: Lessons from Praying Mantises and Plants

Open access
Figdor, Carrie·2024·Philosophy of Science

Abstract

This article advances the development of a phylogeny-based psychology in which cognitive ability types are individuated as characters in the evolutionary biological sense. I explain the character concept and its utility in addressing (or dissolving) conceptual problems arising from discoveries of cognitive abilities across a wide range of species. I use the examples of stereopsis in the praying mantis, internal cell-to-cell signaling in plants, and episodic memory in scrub jays to show how anthropocentric cognitive ability types can be reformulated into cognitive characters, thereby promoting the integration of psychology with other sciences of evolved traits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/psa.2024.10

Cites

94 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The anthropocentric strategy picks out features of the human phenotype and illicitly treats them as the trait.

    “The anthropocentric strategy, in other words, picks out features of the human phenotype and illicitly treats them as the trait.”

    From Consciousness at sea (2025) · cites this paper as [49]

  • The trait-individuation problem is both under-appreciated and remains largely unresolved within theoretical evolutionary biology and has rarely been explicitly addressed in cognitive science.

    “This is not the trivial point about the need to clearly articulate an explanandum: the trait-individuation problem is both under-appreciated and remains largely unresolved within theoretical evolutionary biology and it has rarely been explicitly addressed in cognitive science (see [49] for an exception that proves the rule).”

    From Consciousness at sea (2025) · cites this paper as [49]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Chang, H.. Inventing Temperature. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
  2. Clayton, N., and J. Russell. "Looking for episodic memory in animals and young children: Prospects for a new minimalism." Neuropsychologia 47 (2009): 2330-2340.
  3. Colaço, D.. "Why studying plant cognitio is valuable, even if plants aren't cognitive." Synthese 200 no. 6 article 453 (2022): 1-18.
  4. Ereshefsky, M. "Homology thinking". Biology & Philosophy 27 (2012): 381-400.
  5. Hanna, R.. "Kantian non-conceptualism". Philosophical Studies, 137 (2008): 41-64.
  6. Murphy, D.. Psychiatry in the scientific image. Mit Press, 2012.
  7. Pan, T., Lu, D., Xin, H., & Li, B. "Biophotonic probes for bio-detection and imaging." Light: Science & Applications 10 no. 124 (2021): 1-22. 75
  8. Pigliucci, M., & Preston, K. (Eds.). Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Oxford University Press, 2004.
  9. Read, J. C.. "Stereopsis without correspondence". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 378 no. 1869 article 20210449 (2023): 1-21.
  10. Tulving, E. "Episodic and semantic memory." In E. Tulving and W. Donaldson, Organization of Memory (Academic Press, 1972): 381-403. https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2024.10 Published online by Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Figdor, C.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Figdor, Carrie
Venue
Philosophy of Science
Published
2024-03-22
Volume
91
Issue
4
Pages
930-949
ISSN
  • 0031-8248 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-767X
OpenAlex
W4393091428
Cited by
9
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5
FWCI
13.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophy of Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
character concept, evolutionary biology, Mantodea, stereopsis, episodic memory, scrub jay, anthropocentrism, animal cognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review