Cited by 116Animal Nutrition and PhysiologyVeterinary medicine and infectious diseasesAquaculture disease management and microbiota

Effect of purified β-glucans derived from Laminaria digitata,Laminaria hyperborea and Saccharomyces cerevisiae on piglet performance, selected bacterial populations, volatile fatty acids and pro-inflammatory cytokines in the gastrointestinal tract of pigs

Open access
Sweeney, T., Collins, C. B., Reilly, P., Pierce, K. M., Ryan, M., O'Doherty, J. V.·2012·British Journal Of Nutrition

Abstract

β-Glucans have been identified as natural biomolecules with immunomodulatory activity. The first objective of the present study was to compare the effects of purified β-glucans derived from Laminaria digitata, L. hyperborea and Saccharomyces cerevisiae on piglet performance, selected bacterial populations and intestinal volatile fatty acid (VFA) production. The second aim was to compare the gene expression profiles of the markers of pro- and anti-inflammation in both unchallenged and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-challenged ileal and colonic tissues. β-Glucans were included at 250 mg/kg in the diets. The β-glucans derived from L. hyperborea, L. digitata and S. cerevisiae all reduced the Enterobacteriaceae population (P<0·05) without influencing the lactobacilli and bifidobacteria populations (P>0·05) in the ileum and colon. There was a significant interaction between gastrointestinal region and β-glucan source in the expression of cytokine markers, IL-1α (<0·001), IL-10 (P<0·05), TNF-α (P<0·05) and IL-17A (P<0·001). β-Glucans did not stimulate any pro- or anti-inflammatory cytokine markers in the ileal epithelial cells. In contrast, the expression of a panel of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1α, IL-10, TNF-α and IL-17A) was down-regulated in the colon following exposure to β-glucans from all the three sources. However, the data suggest that the soluble β-glucans derived from L. digitata may be acting via a different mechanism from the insoluble β-glucans derived from L. hyperborea and S. cerevisiae, as the VFA profile was different in the L. digitata-treated animals. There was an increase in IL-8 gene expression (P<0·05) in the gastrointestinal tract from the animals exposed to L. digitata following an LPS ex vivo challenge that was not evident in the other two treatment groups. In conclusion, β-glucans from both seaweed and yeast sources reduce Enterobacteriaceae counts and pro-inflammatory markers in the colon, though the mechanisms of action may be different between the soluble and insoluble fibre sources.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114511006751

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In pigs, dietary β-glucans from Laminaria digitata, Laminaria hyperborea and Saccharomyces cerevisiae down-regulated inflammatory cytokine expression in colon and liver.

    “In vivo studies using β-glucans from Laminaria digitata, Laminaria hyperborea and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the diet of pigs showed a down-regulation of the expression of inflammatory cytokines in the colon and liver of the animals”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sweeney, T., Collins, C. B., Reilly, P., Pierce, K. M., Ryan, M., & O'Doherty, J. V.
Affiliations
University College Dublin (IE)
Venue
British Journal Of Nutrition
Published
2012-02-07
Volume
108
Issue
7
Pages
1226-1234
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2029669822
Cited by
116
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
Keywords
β-glucan, Laminaria digitata, Laminaria hyperborea, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, piglets, piglet performance, Enterobacteriaceae, volatile fatty acids, inflammatory cytokines, anti-inflammatory cytokines, lipopolysaccharide challenge, IL-17A, IL-10, IL-1α, TNF-α, interleukin-8, ileum, colon, immunomodulation, seaweed
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Feed, Bifidobacterium, Colon, Enterobacteriaceae, Fatty Acids, Volatile, Ileum, Lactobacillus, Laminaria, Lipopolysaccharides, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Solubility, Weight Gain, Cytokines, Gene Expression Profiling, Sus scrofa, Lower Gastrointestinal Tract, beta-Glucans, Microbial Viability, Prebiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review