Cited by 179Nutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

A review of the use of information and communication technologies for dietary assessment

Open access
Ngo, Joy, Engelen, Anouk, Molag, Marja, Roesle, Joni, García-Segovia, Purificación, Serra-Majem, Lluís·2009·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Presently used dietary-assessment methods often present difficulties for researchers and respondents, and misreporting errors are common. Methods using information and communication technologies (ICT) may improve quality and accuracy. The present paper presents a systematic literature review describing studies applying ICT to dietary assessment. Eligible papers published between January 1995 and February 2008 were classified into four assessment categories: computerised assessment; personal digital assistants (PDA); digital photography; smart cards. Computerised assessments comprise frequency questionnaires, 24 h recalls (24HR) and diet history assessments. Self-administered computerised assessments, which can include audio support, may reduce literacy problems, be translated and are useful for younger age groups, but less so for those unfamiliar with computers. Self-administered 24HR utilising computers yielded comparable results as standard methods, but needed supervision if used in children. Computer-assisted interviewer-administered recall results were similar to conventional recalls, and reduced inter-interviewer variability. PDA showed some advantages but did not reduce underreporting. Mobile phone meal photos did not improve PDA accuracy. Digital photography for assessing individual food intake in dining facilities was accurate for adults and children, although validity was slightly higher with direct visual observation. Smart cards in dining facilities were useful for measuring food choice but not total dietary intake. In conclusion, computerised assessments and PDA are promising, and could improve dietary assessment quality in some vulnerable groups and decrease researcher workload. Both still need comprehensive evaluation for micronutrient intake assessment. Further work is necessary for improving ICT tools in established and new methods and for their rigorous evaluation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114509990638

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. MJ Gibney, BM Margetts, JM Kearney, L Arab editors, on behalf of the Nutrition Society]. Oxford: Blackwell Science.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ngo, J., Engelen, A., Molag, M., Roesle, J., García-Segovia, P., & Serra-Majem, L.
Affiliations
  • Parc Científic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Ngo, Joy
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2009-07
Volume
101
Issue
S2
Pages
S102-S112
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2143197687
Cited by
179
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Acceda (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
dietary assessment, information and communication technologies, personal digital assistants, digital photography, smart cards, 24-hour dietary recall, dietary history, underreporting, food intake measurement, dining facilities, micronutrient intake
MeSH terms
Computers, Diet Surveys, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Photography, Mental Recall, Research Design, Nutrition Assessment, Diet Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review