Cited by 291Astro and Planetary ScienceFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

Simulation of equatorial and high-latitude jets on Jupiter in a deep convection model

Heimpel, Moritz, Aurnou, Jonathan, Wicht, Johannes·2005·Nature

Abstract

The bands of Jupiter represent a global system of powerful winds. Broad eastward equatorial jets are flanked by smaller-scale, higher-latitude jets flowing in alternating directions. Jupiter's large thermal emission suggests that the winds are powered from within, but the zonal flow depth is limited by increasing density and electrical conductivity in the molecular hydrogen-helium atmosphere towards the centre of the planet. Two types of planetary flow models have been explored: shallow-layer models reproduce multiple high-latitude jets, but not the equatorial flow system, and deep convection models only reproduce an eastward equatorial jet with two flanking neighbours. Here we present a numerical model of three-dimensional rotating convection in a relatively thin spherical shell that generates both types of jets. The simulated flow is turbulent and quasi-two-dimensional and, as observed for the jovian jets, simulated jet widths follow Rhines' scaling theory. Our findings imply that Jupiter's latitudinal transition in jet width corresponds to a separation between the bottom-bounded flow structures in higher latitudes and the deep equatorial flows.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature04208

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alternating jets on gas giant planets are either shallow, existing above about 10 bars, or deep, extending to tens of thousands of bars.

    “on one hand, the alternating jets on gas giant planets are 'shallow', existing above 10 bars or so [15-17]; on the other hand, zonal jets are 'deep', extending to tens of thousands of bars [18-22].”

    From Deep rotating convection generates the polar hexagon on Saturn (2020) · cites this paper as [21]

    The paper’s main text (page unavailable) models deep zonal flow and places its simulated shell at approximately 7,000 km below Jupiter’s surface. It does not give a depth in bars or establish that the jets extend to tens of thousands of bars. The ‘above 10 bars’ shallow-jet statement is attached to other citations, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The simulation was run for about 0.1 viscous diffusion time (about 1600 rotations), similar to earlier high-resolution studies.

    “we could simulate it for about 0.1 viscous diffusion time (about 1600 rotations), which is similar to earlier highresolution studies [21, 35].”
  • Existing models posit as the driver of the flow either the differential radiative heating of the upper atmosphere or the intrinsic heat fluxes emanating from the deep interior.

    “Existing models posit as the driver of the flow either the differential radiative heating of the upper atmosphere (e.g., Williams 1979Williams , 2003b) ) or the intrinsic heat fluxes emanating from the deep interior (e.g., Busse 1976;Heimpel et al. 2005;Aurnou et al. 2007;Chan and Mayr 2008;Kaspi et al. 2009).”

    From Mechanisms of Jet Formation on the Giant Planets (2010) · cites this paper as Heimpel et al. 2005

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heimpel, M., Aurnou, J., & Wicht, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Heimpel, Moritz
Venue
Nature
Published
2005-11
Volume
438
Issue
7065
Pages
193-196
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1984695169
Cited by
291
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Western Canada Research Grid
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
Jupiter, equatorial jet, zonal wind, atmospheric bands, deep convection, rotating convection, spherical shell, turbulent flow, three-dimensional numerical model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review