Cited by 193Astro and Planetary ScienceFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics

Interaction of eddies and mean zonal flow on Jupiter as inferred from Voyager 1 and 2 images.

Ingersoll, Andrew P., Beebe, Reta F., Mitchell, Jim L., Garneau, Glenn W., Yagi, Gary M., Müller, Jan‐Peter·1981·Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Abstract

Voyager 1 and 2 narrow‐angle frames were used to obtain displacements of features at resolutions of 130 km over time intervals of 1 Jovian rotation. The zonal velocity ū was constant to 1.5% during the 4 months between the Voyager 1 and 2 encounters. The latitudes of the zonal jet maxima (extrema of ū) are the same as inferred from earth‐based observations extending over the past 80 years. The curvature of the velocity profile d²ū/dy² varies with latitudinal coordinate y in the range from −3β to +2β, where β is the planetary vorticity gradient. The barotropic stability criterion is violated at about 10 latitudes between ±60°. The eddy momentum flux variation with latitude is positively correlated with dū/dy for both Voyager 1 and 2 data. The rate of conversion of eddy kinetic energy into zonal mean kinetic energy is in the range 1.5–3.0 Wm −2 , for a layer 2.5 bar deep. The time constant for resupply of zonal mean kinetic energy by eddies is in the range 2–4 months, less than the interval between Voyager encounters. The rate of energy conversion is more than 10% of the total infrared heat flux for Jupiter, in contrast with earth where it is only 0.1% of the infrared heat flux. This hundred‐fold difference suggests that the thermomechanical energy cycles are very different on the two planets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/ja086ia10p08733

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Eddy angular momentum fluxes inferred from tracking cloud features in Jupiter's and Saturn's upper tropospheres indicate that the mean conversion rate from eddy to mean-flow kinetic energy is of order 10^-5 W m^-3.

    “But the eddy angular momentum fluxes inferred from tracking cloud features in Jupiter's and Saturn's upper tropospheres indicate that the mean conversion rate from eddy to mean-flow kinetic energy is of order 10 25 W m 23 (Ingersoll et al. 1981;Salyk et al. 2006;Del Genio et al. 2007).”

    From Mechanisms of Jet Formation on the Giant Planets (2010) · cites this paper as Ingersoll et al. 1981

  • Such angular momentum transport from retrograde into prograde jets has indeed been observed on Jupiter and Saturn.

    “Such angular momentum transport from retrograde into prograde jets has indeed been observed on Jupiter and Saturn (Ingersoll et al. 1981;Salyk et al. 2006;Del Genio et al. 2007).”

    From Mechanisms of Jet Formation on the Giant Planets (2010) · cites this paper as Ingersoll et al. 1981

  • This angular momentum transport has a baroclinic structure and, in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, is in structure and magnitude consistent with observations.

    “It has a baroclinic structure and, in the Jupiter and Saturn simulations, is in structure and magnitude consistent with observations (cf.Ingersoll et al. 1981;Salyk et al. 2006;Del Genio et al. 2007).”

    From Mechanisms of Jet Formation on the Giant Planets (2010) · cites this paper as Ingersoll et al. 1981

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ingersoll, A. P., Beebe, R. F., Mitchell, J. L., Garneau, G. W., Yagi, G. M., & Müller, J.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Published
1981-09-30
Volume
86
Issue
A10
Pages
8733-8743
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2168895689
Cited by
193
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
15.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Keywords
Jupiter, zonal jets, eddy-mean flow interaction, eddy momentum flux, atmospheric dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review