Cited by 122Astro and Planetary ScienceFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsHigh-pressure geophysics and materials

Turbulent convection in rapidly rotating spherical shells: A model for equatorial and high latitude jets on Jupiter and Saturn

Open access
Heimpel, Moritz, Aurnou, Jonathan·2007·Icarus

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.icarus.2006.10.023

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The latitudinal difference in jet and vortex structure is likely driven by the topographical beta effect, which is stronger near the equator and promotes axisymmetric jets, while at higher latitudes the beta effect decreases and the system approaches a rotating plane layer where giant vortices are favored.

    “This is likely driven by the topographical β effect, due to the spherical shell geometry, which is stronger near the equator, promoting strong axisymmetric jets, while, at higher latitudes, the β -effect decreases and the system approaches a rotating plane layer where the formation of giant vortices is favored”

    From Deep rotating convection generates the polar hexagon on Saturn (2020) · cites this paper as [26]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The number and widths of the zonal jets are likely determined by the zonal flow strength and the topographic beta effect.

    “the number and the widths of the zonal jets are likely determined by the zonal flow strength and the topographic β effect [26].”

    From Deep rotating convection generates the polar hexagon on Saturn (2020) · cites this paper as [26]

    Section 3.2 relates jet wavelength to both flow velocity and the topographic β-parameter, while Section 2 links the number of high-latitude jets to their velocity-dependent wavelength. But Section 6 says the equatorial jet does not appear to follow Rhines scaling and that its width instead seems controlled by the size of the equatorial region. The claim is therefore too broad if it applies to all zonal jets. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Deep-flow models that posit intrinsic heat fluxes as the sole driver of the flow can generate equatorial superrotation, but they use heat fluxes more than 10^6 times larger than those observed.

    “For example, deep-flow models that posit intrinsic heat fluxes as the sole driver of the flow can generate equatorial superrotation, but they use heat fluxes more than 10 6 times larger than those observed (e.g., Heimpel and Aurnou 2007).”

    From Mechanisms of Jet Formation on the Giant Planets (2010) · cites this paper as Heimpel and Aurnou 2007

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heimpel, M., & Aurnou, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Heimpel, Moritz
Venue
Icarus
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
187
Issue
2
Pages
540-557
ISSN
0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018072329
Cited by
122
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Icarus (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › High-pressure geophysics and materials
Keywords
zonal jets, turbulent convection, Jupiter, Saturn, equatorial jet, geostrophic turbulence, tangent cylinder, beta parameter, jet width, planetary interiors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review