Cited by 13Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Current status of canine dirofilariosis in an endemic area of western Spain

Diosdado, A., Gómez, P.J., González-Miguel, J., Simón, F., Morchón, R.·2018·Journal of Helminthology

Abstract

Since dirofilariosis caused by Dirofilaria immitis is a vector-borne disease, its distribution depends on environmental conditions as well as demographic factors and the management of pets by humans. In the province of Salamanca (west-central Spain) the disease has been known for many years, appearing in an area with extensive irrigated crops along the Tormes river. Because recent demographic changes have occurred in this area, the present study has been carried out with the aim of monitoring the distribution and prevalence of the disease in the canine population of this area. For that purpose, 191 dogs were analysed through antigen and microfilaria tests and geo-referenced in a map. The overall prevalence was 5.8%, although the disease was only present in dogs from municipalities with irrigated crops in which the prevalence was 16.7%. These results indicate that D. immitis continues to be present in the province of Salamanca, and that it is associated with the presence of irrigation, but with a clear decrease in the prevalence. Causes of the decrease in prevalence, as well as the potential zoonotic risk, are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022149x17000591

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Salamanca, prevalence decreased from 29.08% to 16.7%, which could be attributed to use of microfilaricides for control of other parasitic diseases.

    “However, in the last years, the prevalence in these places has decreased from 29.08% to 16.7%, which could be attributed to the use of microfilaricides for the control of other parasitic diseases [23,24].”
  • The prevalences obtained for dirofilariosis in this study maintain similar values with respect to areas evaluated in the last 5-6 years, such as Barcelona, Madrid, Salamanca, or the Canary Islands.

    “the prevalences obtained in this study maintain similar values with respect to the areas that had been evaluated in the last 5–6 years, such as Barcelona, Madrid, Salamanca, or the Canary Islands”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diosdado, A., Gómez, P. J., González-Miguel, J., Simón, F., & Morchón, R.
Affiliations
Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
Corresponding author
Morchón, R.
Venue
Journal of Helminthology
Published
2017-07-03
Volume
92
Issue
4
Pages
520-523
ISSN
  • 0022-149X (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2697
OpenAlex
W2729129580
Cited by
13
References
15
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Helminthology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
canine dirofilariasis, Dirofilaria immitis, irrigated crops, vector-borne diseases, Salamanca province, Tormes River, zoonotic risk, disease mapping, microfilaria detection, antigen testing
MeSH terms
Animals, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Female, Male, Spain, Endemic Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review