Cited by 34Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs from Barcelona: Validation of a geospatial prediction model

Montoya-Alonso, José Alberto, Carretón, Elena, Simón, Luis, González-Miguel, Javier, García-Guasch, Laín, Morchón, Rodrigo, Simón, Fernando·2015·Veterinary Parasitology

Abstract

Like other vector borne infections, the distribution of dirofilariosis caused by Dirofilaria immitis is influenced by climatic factors, which regulate the diversity and abundance of mosquito species able to transmit the parasite. Geographical Information Systems (GIS) can predict the distribution and epidemiological behavior of dirofilariosis based on temperature and humidity data. This study analyses the prevalence and current distribution of canine dirofilariosis in the province of Barcelona (Northeastern Spain), and uses a GIS model to evaluate the relationship between the spatial distribution of positive cases and different geo-environmental factors. Canine dirofilariosis is present in all the studied regions but unevenly distributed. The general prevalence is 2.4%, being located most of positive dogs in areas where the model predict both high number of annual generations of D. immitis in vectors and humidity, as a consequence of the presence of irrigated crops or the proximity to the sea. Furthermore, in the urban area of Barcelona, infected dogs were located in districts surrounded or close to parks and green areas. The model can be used as a tool to determine the need of implementation of prophylactic protocols in pets living in municipalities from these regions, based on the geo-environmental characteristics of the area.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.06.025

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the last 15 years, a slight increase in heartworm can be confirmed in most autonomous communities, with decreasing prevalences or similar values only in Aragon, Catalonia, Valencian Community, Madrid and Castilla y León.

    “in the last 15 years a slight increase in heartworm can be confirmed in most of the autonomous communities, with decreasing prevalences or with similar values only in Aragon, Catalonia, Valencian Community, Madrid and Castilla y León.”

    From Expansion of canine heartworm in Spain (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

  • Dogs living indoors showed significantly lower prevalences because they are less exposed to vector mosquitoes.

    “Regarding habitat, dogs living indoors showed significantly lower prevalences, as shown in other similar studies [8,9,11,12,13,19]. As has been pointed out in previous studies, animals that live indoors are less exposed to the presence of vector mosquitoes and, thus, prevalences are lower.”

    From Expansion of canine heartworm in Spain (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

  • In the province of Barcelona, average canine heartworm prevalence was 2.4%, higher in Baix Llobregat (11.1 to 33.3%).

    “In the province of Barcelona, the average prevalence was 2.4%, being higher in municipalities belonging to the Baix Llobregat area, (11.1 to 33.3%), which has the highest risk of infection in the whole province [21].”
  • In cats, seroprevalence values of 11.4% and 18.1% were detected in Barcelona and the Canary Islands, respectively.

    “In cats, seroprevalence values of 11.4% and 18.1% were detected in Barcelona and the Canary Islands, respectively ( Montoya-Alonso et al., 2014 and Montoya-Alonso et al., 2015).”
  • Mongrel dogs showed higher but not significantly different D. immitis prevalences (4.2%) compared with pure-breed dogs (2.6%).

    “By breed, mongrel dogs showed higher but not significantly different prevalences (4.2%) when compared with pure-breed dogs (2.6%) (χ 2 = 2.902, df = 1, P = 0.088).”

    From Prevalence of heartworm in dogs and cats of Madrid, Spain (2017) · cites this paper as [21]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montoya-Alonso, J. A., Carretón, E., Simón, L., González-Miguel, J., García-Guasch, L., Morchón, R., & Simón, F.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ES)
  • Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
Corresponding author
Carretón, Elena
Venue
Veterinary Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
212
Issue
3-4
Pages
456-459
ISSN
0304-4017 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2235381943
Cited by
34
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Acceda (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Elanco Animal Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
Dirofilaria immitis, canine dirofilariasis, prevalence, geographic information systems, mosquito vectors, temperature and humidity, irrigated crops, urban green space, Barcelona province, prophylaxis
MeSH terms
Animals, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Female, Male, Models, Biological, Spain, Prevalence, Geographic Information Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review