Cited by 71Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and RehabilitationNoise Effects and Management

Clinical efficacy of tinnitus retraining therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy in the treatment of subjective tinnitus: a systematic review

Grewal, R, Spielmann, P M, Jones, S E M, Hussain, S S M·2014·The Journal of Laryngology & Otology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of two frequently employed interventions for the management of tinnitus: tinnitus retraining therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy. METHOD: A systematic review of literature published up to and including February 2013 was performed. Only randomised control trials and studies involving only human participants were included. RESULTS: Nine high-quality studies evaluating the efficacy of tinnitus retraining therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy were identified. Of these, eight assessed cognitive behavioural therapy relative to a no-treatment control and one compared tinnitus retraining therapy to tinnitus masking therapy. Each study used a variety of standardised and validated questionnaires. Outcome measures were heterogeneous, but both therapies resulted in significant improvements in quality of life scores. Depression scores improved with cognitive behavioural therapy. CONCLUSION: Both cognitive behavioural therapy and tinnitus retraining therapy are effective for tinnitus, with neither therapy being demonstrably superior. Further research using standardised, validated questionnaires is needed so that objective comparisons can be made.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022215114002849

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grewal, R., Spielmann, P. M., Jones, S. E. M., & Hussain, S. S. M.
Affiliations
Ninewells Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Hussain, S S M
Venue
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
Published
2014-11-24
Volume
128
Issue
12
Pages
1028-1033
ISSN
  • 0022-2151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-5460
OpenAlex
W2054695407
Cited by
70
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Laryngology & Otology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
Keywords
tinnitus retraining therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, subjective tinnitus, tinnitus treatment, quality of life, depression, treatment efficacy comparison
MeSH terms
Humans, Tinnitus, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review