Cited by 61Chronic Disease Management StrategiesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMental Health Treatment and Access

Including information about co-morbidity in estimates of disease burden: results from the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys

Open access
Alonso, J., Vilagut, G., Chatterji, S., Heeringa, S., Schoenbaum, M., Bedirhan Üstün, T., Rojas-Farreras, S., Angermeyer, M. +14 more·2011·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: The methodology commonly used to estimate disease burden, featuring ratings of severity of individual conditions, has been criticized for ignoring co-morbidity. A methodology that addresses this problem is proposed and illustrated here with data from the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. Although the analysis is based on self-reports about one's own conditions in a community survey, the logic applies equally well to analysis of hypothetical vignettes describing co-morbid condition profiles. Method: Face-to-face interviews in 13 countries (six developing, nine developed;n=31 067; response rate=69.6%) assessed 10 classes of chronic physical and nine of mental conditions. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess overall perceived health. Multiple regression analysis with interactions for co-morbidity was used to estimate associations of conditions with VAS. Simulation was used to estimate condition-specific effects. Results: The best-fitting model included condition main effects and interactions of types by numbers of conditions. Neurological conditions, insomnia and major depression were rated most severe. Adjustment for co-morbidity reduced condition-specific estimates with substantial between-condition variation (0.24–0.70 ratios of condition-specific estimates with and without adjustment for co-morbidity). The societal-level burden rankings were quite different from the individual-level rankings, with the highest societal-level rankings associated with conditions having high prevalence rather than high individual-level severity. Conclusions: Plausible estimates of disorder-specific effects on VAS can be obtained using methods that adjust for co-morbidity. These adjustments substantially influence condition-specific ratings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291710001212

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even if depression is more a consequence than a cause of chronic physical disorders, as it appears to be for some disorders, comorbid depression is often associated with a worse course of the physical disorder.

    “Second, even if depression is more a consequence than a cause of chronic physical disorders, as it appears to be for some disorders, comorbid depression is often associated with a worse course of the physical disorder. 187-190”
  • A meta-analysis containing data from more than 1.8 million individuals in 35 countries confirms the presence of a significant association between depression and excess all-cause mortality, although this association may have been overestimated because of publication bias and low study quality.

    “A meta-analysis containing data from more than 1.8 million individuals in 35 countries confirms the presence of a significant association between depression and excess all-cause mortality, although this association may have been overestimated because of publication bias and low study quality. 190”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alonso, J., Vilagut, G., Chatterji, S., Heeringa, S., Schoenbaum, M., Bedirhan Üstün, T., Rojas-Farreras, S., Angermeyer, M., Bromet, E., Bruffaerts, R., de Girolamo, G., Gureje, O., Haro, J. M., Karam, A. N., Kovess, V., Levinson, D., Liu, Z., Medina-Mora, M. E., Ormel, J., Posada-Villa, J., Uda, H., & Kessler, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Municipal Institute for Medical Research (ES)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • University College Hospital, Ibadan (NG)
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (ES)
  • University of Balamand (LB)
  • Israel Ministry of Health (IL)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca (CO)
  • Osumi Regional Promotion Bureau (JP)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Kessler, R. C.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2010-06-16
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
873-886
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2171960618
Cited by
61
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (044708)
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation (R01 DA016558, R13-MH066849)
  • John W. Alden Trust
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • European Commission (QLG5–1999-01042, SANCO2004123, 2004123)
  • Generalitat de Catalunya (01042)
  • Bundesministerium für Gesundheit
  • National Insurance Institute of Israel
  • Regione Piemonte
  • National Institutes of Health (5r13mh066849-04, 5r01mh069864-04, 5r01mh070884-05)
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
  • Pfizer Foundation (R01‐MH069864, R01-DA016558, R13-MH066849, R03-TW006481)
  • Pan American Health Organization
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CB06/02/0046, RETICS RD06/0011, RD06/0011, CIBER CB06/02/0046)
  • Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R13-MH-066849, R0 1-MH61905, R01‐MH070884, U01-MH-60220, R01MH061905, R01MH059575, MH60220, HHSN271200700030C, U13MH066849, U01MH060220, R01‐MH069864)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K05DA015799, R01DA016558)
  • Fogarty International Center (FIRCA R03TW006481, R03TW006481)
  • Cilag
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
disease burden, comorbidities, condition severity, mental illness, chronic physical illness, health perception, visual analogue scale, social burden, insomnia, major depressive disorder, neurological disorders, World Mental Health Surveys
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Mental Disorders, Chronic Disease, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Female, Health Policy, Health Status Indicators, Health Surveys, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Nervous System Diseases, Pain Measurement, World Health Organization, Health Care Rationing, Comorbidity, Cost of Illness, Universal Health Insurance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review