The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transcranial direct current stimulation in the treatment of major depression: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: So far, no comprehensive answer has emerged to the question of whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can make a clinically useful contribution to the treatment of major depression. We aim to present a systematic review and meta-analysis of tDCS in the treatment of depression. Method: Medline and Embase were searched for open-label and randomized controlled trials of tDCS in depression using the expressions (‘transcranial direct current stimulation’ or ‘tDCS’) and (‘depression’ or ‘depressed’). Study data were extracted with a standardized data sheet. For randomized controlled trials, effect size (Hedges' g) was calculated and the relationships between study variables and effect size explored using meta-regression. Results: A total of 108 citations were screened and 10 studies included in the systematic review. Six randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis, with a cumulative sample of 96 active and 80 sham tDCS courses. Active tDCS was found to be more effective than sham tDCS for the reduction of depression severity (Hedges' g=0.743, 95% confidence interval 0.21–1.27), although study results differed more than expected by chance (Q=15.52, df=6, p=0.017, I2=61.35). Meta-regression did not reveal any significant correlations. Conclusions: Our study was limited by the small number of studies included, which often had small sample size. Future studies should use larger, if possible representative, health service patient samples, and optimized protocols to evaluate the efficacy of tDCS in the treatment of depression further.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955
Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2000) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x · Cited by 5,656
Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis.
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.486 · Cited by 2,977
Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans
Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.57.10.1899 · Cited by 2,617
Treatment of depression with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): A Review
Nitsche, M. A., Boggio, P. S., Fregni, F., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2009) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.03.038 · Cited by 498
Transcranial direct current stimulation for depression: 3-week, randomised, sham-controlled trial
Loo, C. K., Alonzo, A., Martin, D., Mitchell, P. B., Galvez, V., & Sachdev, P. (2012) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.111.097634 · Cited by 455
Self-citationBoosting focally-induced brain plasticity by dopamine
Kuo, M.-F., Paulus, W., & Nitsche, M. A. (2008) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm098 · Cited by 269 · cited 1×
“…has been repeatedly noted that the effects of tDCS are influenced substantially by neuromodulators including dopamine and acetylcholine (Nitsche et al. 2004, 2009; Kuo et al. 2007, 2008), a crucial question is whether the efficacy of tDCS is influenced by the current medication status of patients.”
BackgroundTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in unipolar vs. bipolar depressive disorder
Brunoni, A. R., Ferrucci, R., Bortolomasi, M., Vergari, M., Tadini, L., Boggio, P. S., Giacopuzzi, M., Barbieri, S., & Priori, A. (2011) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.09.010 · Cited by 226
Cited by
Cleare, A., Pariante, C., Young, A., Anderson, I., Christmas, D., Cowen, P., Dickens, C., Ferrier, I., Geddes, J., Gilbody, S., et al. (2015) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881115581093 · Cited by 759
Horvath, J. C., Forte, J. D., & Carter, O. (2015) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.400 · Cited by 609
Brunoni, A. R., Moffa, A. H., Fregni, F., Palm, U., Padberg, F., Blumberger, D. M., Daskalakis, Z. J., Bennabi, D., Haffen, E., Alonzo, A., et al. (2016) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.115.164715 · Cited by 414
Self-citationMutz, J., Vipulananthan, V., Carter, B., Hurlemann, R., Fu, C. H. Y., & Young, A. H. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l1079 · Cited by 427
Health, T. L. G. (2020) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(20)30432-0 · Cited by 417
“In their meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials of tDCS use in depression, Kalu and colleagues found a significant reduction in the severity of depressive symptoms with active tDCS compared with sham tDCS.(16) However, they noted that many of the studies had small sample sizes, and they encouraged readers t…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalu, U. G., Sexton, C. E., Loo, C. K., & Ebmeier, K. P.
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2012-01-12
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1791-1800
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2023484210
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 2.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcranial direct current stimulation in the treatment of major depression: a meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033291711003059
- The paper
- Kalu, U. G., Sexton, C. E., Loo, C. K., & Ebmeier, K. P. (2012). Transcranial direct current stimulation in the treatment of major depression: a meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291711003059
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.