Cited by 158Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Attention and inhibition in children with ASD, ADHD and co-morbid ASD + ADHD: an event-related potential study

Tye, C., Asherson, P., Ashwood, K. L., Azadi, B., Bolton, P., McLoughlin, G.·2014·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: Substantial overlap has been reported between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Deficits in executive function (EF) are characteristic of both disorders but these impairments have not been compared directly across pure and co-morbid cases using event-related potentials (ERPs). Method: Behavioural parameters and ERPs were recorded during a flankered cued-continuous performance test (CPT-OX) administered to 8–13-year-old boys with ASD ( n = 19), ADHD ( n = 18), co-morbid ASD + ADHD ( n = 29) and typically developing controls (TD; n = 26). Preparatory processing (contingent negative variation, CNV) and attentional orienting (Cue-P3) at cues, response execution at targets (Go-P3), inhibitory processing at non-targets (NoGo-P3) and conflict monitoring between target and non-target trials (Go-N2 v. NoGo-N2) were examined. Results: Categorical diagnoses and quantitative trait measures indicated that participants with ADHD (ADHD/ASD + ADHD) made more omission errors and exhibited increased reaction-time (RT) variability and reduced amplitude of the Cue-P3 and NoGo-P3 compared to TD/ASD participants. Participants with ASD (ASD/ ASD + ADHD) demonstrated reduced N2 enhancement from Go to NoGo trials compared to TD/ADHD participants. Participants with ASD-only displayed enhanced CNV amplitude compared to ASD + ADHD and TD participants. Conclusions: Children with ADHD show deficits in attentional orienting and inhibitory control whereas children with ASD show abnormalities in conflict monitoring and response preparation. Children with co-morbid ASD + ADHD present as an additive co-occurrence with deficits of both disorders, although non-additive effects are suggested for response preparation. Measuring ERPs that index attention and inhibition is useful in disentangling cognitive markers of ASD and ADHD and elucidating the basis of co-occurring ASD + ADHD to guide clinical assessment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291713001049

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ASD performance on continuous performance tasks is mixed, and individuals with ASD may use an alternative, possibly compensatory, strategy to perform similarly.

    “suggesting that individuals with ASD may use an alternative, perhaps compensatory, strategy to perform similarly on CPTs.”
  • The finding that subgroup differences were similar in both ASD and TD samples may appear inconsistent with prior studies showing an effect of ASD on the relationship between cognitive measures and task performance.

    “Our finding that the differences between subgroups were similar in both ASD and TD samples may appear inconsistent with prior studies that show an effect of ASD on the relationship between cognitive measures and task performance12,27,37,38.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tye, C., Asherson, P., Ashwood, K. L., Azadi, B., Bolton, P., & McLoughlin, G.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Tye, C.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2013-05-15
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
1101-1116
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2138328227
Cited by
158
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
8.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0510-10268)
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, comorbidities, executive function, attention, inhibition, conflict monitoring, attentional orienting, response preparation, contingent negative variation, P3, N2, continuous performance test, children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Contingent Negative Variation, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Comorbidity, Event-Related Potentials, P300

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review