Cited by 74Schizophrenia research and treatmentCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The association between cannabis abuse and subsequent schizophrenia: A Swedish national co-relative control study

Open access
Giordano, G. N., Ohlsson, H., Sundquist, K., Sundquist, J., Kendler, K. S.·2015·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although cannabis abuse (CA) is known to be associated with schizophrenia, the causal nature of this association is unclear, with prodromal effects complicating its interpretation. METHOD: From Swedish national registry databases, we used a co-relative case-control design with full-sibling, half-sibling and first-cousin comparisons, alongside a general Swedish population sample. Using ICD codes, 5456 individuals with an initial diagnosis of schizophrenia (2000-2010) were matched with five schizophrenia-free controls. We further identified first-cousin, half-sibling and full-sibling pairs discordant for CA and statistically extrapolated results for discordant monozygotic (MZ) twins. RESULTS: Within the general Swedish population, CA was strongly associated with later schizophrenia [odds ratio (OR) 10.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 8.99-12.11]. This association was substantially attenuated both by increasing temporal delays between CA exposure and schizophrenia diagnosis and by controlling for increasing degrees of familial confounding. Extrapolated discordant MZ pairs suggested that fully controlling for confounding familial factors reduced the association between CA and later schizophrenia to more modest levels (ORs of approximately 3.3 and 1.6 with 3- and 7-year temporal delays respectively). Opiate, sedative, cocaine/stimulant and hallucinogen abuse were also strongly associated with subsequent schizophrenia in the general population. After controlling for familial confounding, only cocaine/stimulant exposure remained associated. CONCLUSIONS: CA has an appreciable causal impact on future risk for schizophrenia. However, population-based estimates of cannabis-schizophrenia co-morbidity substantially overestimate their causal association. Predictions of the cases of schizophrenia that might be prevented by reduced cannabis consumption based on population associations are therefore likely to be considerably overestimated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291714001524

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent study using a co-relative case-control design found that the association between cannabis disorder and schizophrenia became substantially smaller with increasing genetic relatedness from cousin pairs to monozygotic twins, suggesting that estimates from population studies may be overestimated due to genetic and shared environment effects.

    “However, a recent study (26) using a co-relative case-control design found that the association between cannabis disorder and schizophrenia became substantially smaller with increasing genetic relatedness from cousinpairs to monozygotic twins, suggesting that estimates from population studies may be overestimated due to genetic and shared environment effects.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giordano, G. N., Ohlsson, H., Sundquist, K., Sundquist, J., & Kendler, K. S.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Kendler, K. S.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2014-07-01
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
407-414
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2063105674
Cited by
74
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3
FWCI
8.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2013-1836, K2012-70X-15428-08-3)
  • Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd (2013‐1836, 2012-2378)
  • Region Skåne (K2012-70X-15428-08-3)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA030005, R01DA030005)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
cannabis use disorder, schizophrenia, causal relationship, familial confounding, monozygotic twin discordance, time delay, opiate abuse, sedative abuse, schizophrenia prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Marijuana Abuse, Family, Female, Hallucinogens, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia, Sweden, Twins, Monozygotic, Comorbidity, Causality, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Siblings, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review