Cited by 66Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Acoustic startle reflex in schizophrenia patients and their first‐degree relatives: Evidence of normal emotional modulation

Curtis, Clayton E., Lebow, Boyd, Lake, David S., Katsanis, Joanna, Iacono, William G.·1999·Psychophysiology

Abstract

We investigated emotional disturbances in 36 schizophrenia patients, 48 of their first‐degree relatives, and 56 controls to determine if abnormal affective startle modulation could be associated with genetic risk for schizophrenia. Both patients and relatives had a pattern of startle modulation indistinguishable from controls, with potentiated startle amplitude while viewing negative valence slides and attenuation while viewing positive slides. Patients with flat affect did not differ from those without in startle modulation or slide ratings. The patients and their relatives had lower pleasantness ratings of positive slides and the patients had higher pleasantness ratings of the negative slides than controls. The startle paradigm may not be useful for identifying individuals with a genetic liability for schizophrenia. The results suggest that low‐level defensive and appetitive behaviors are unaffected in schizophrenia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0048577299980757

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychophysiological studies of patients with schizophrenia indicate comparable or more exaggerated facial responsivity to positive and negative stimuli, assessed via facial electromyography, skin conductance, and affective modulation of the startle eyeblink response.

    “psychophysiological studies of patients with schizophrenia indicate comparable or more exaggerated facial responsivity to positive and negative stimuli, assessed via facial electromyography [397,398], skin conductance [399,400], and affective modulation of the startle eyeblink response [401,402].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Curtis, C. E., Lebow, B., Lake, D. S., Katsanis, J., & Iacono, W. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Iacono, William G.
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-07
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
469-475
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W2082771231
Cited by
66
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh049738-04)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 17069, T32MH017069, MH 49738)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
acoustic startle response, schizophrenia, first-degree relatives, emotional valence, flat affect, genetic risk, startle potentiation, defensive behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Affective Symptoms, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nuclear Family, Schizophrenia, Reflex, Startle, Chi-Square Distribution, Case-Control Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review