Cited by 107Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismReading and Literacy DevelopmentLanguage Development and Disorders

Multiple perspectives on word production

Open access
Levelt, Willem J. M., Roelofs, Ardi, Meyer, Antje S.·1999·Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Abstract

The commentaries provide a multitude of perspectives on the theory of lexical access presented in our target article. We respond, on the one hand, to criticisms that concern the embeddings of our model in the larger theoretical frameworks of human performance and of a speaker's multiword sentence and discourse generation. These embeddings, we argue, are either already there or naturally forgeable. On the other hand, we reply to a host of theory-internal issues concerning the abstract properties of our feedforward spreading activation model, which functions without the usual cascading, feedback, and inhibitory connections. These issues also concern the concrete stratification in terms of lexical concepts, syntactic lemmas, and morphophonology. Our response stresses the parsimony of our modeling in the light of its substantial empirical coverage. We elaborate its usefulness for neuroimaging and aphasiology and suggest further cross-linguistic extensions of the model.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0140525x99451775

Cites

235 of 235 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. M. A. Gernsbacher. Academic Press.
  2. Booij, G. (1995) The phonology of Dutch. Oxford University Press.
  3. Boomer, D. S. & Laver, J. D. M. (1968) Slips of the tongue. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 3:2-12.
  4. Braitenberg, V. (1978) Cell assemblies in the cerebral cortex. In: Theoretical approaches to complex systems (Lecture notes in biomathematics, vol. 21), ed.
  5. R. Heim & G. Palm. Springer. [FP]
  6. Braitenberg, V. & Schüz, A. (1991) Anatomy of the cortex. Statistics and geometry. Springer. (2nd edition in press).
  7. Clark, H. H. (1973) Space, time, semantics, and the child. In: Cognitive development and the acquisition of language, ed. T. Moore. Academic Press.
  8. JDJ] (1998) Communal lexicons. In: Context in learning and language understanding, ed. K. Malmkjaer & J. Williams. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Costa, A. & Sebastian, N. (1998) Abstract syllabic structure in language production: Evidence from Spanish studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 24:886-903.
  10. Damian, M. F. & Martin, R. C. (1999) Semantic and phonological factors interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
  11. D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr. Academic Press. [LF, rWJML]
  12. Elbers, L. & Wijnen, F. (1992) Effort, production skill, and language learning. In: Phonological development: Models, research, implications, ed. C. A. Ferguson & C. Stoel-Gammon. York Press.
  13. Ferrand, L., Segui, J. & Grainger, J. (1996) Masked priming of word and picture naming: The role of syllable units. Journal of Memory and Language 35:708-23.
  14. Fujimura, O. (1990) Demisyllables as sets of features: Comments on Clement's paper. In: Papers in laboratory phonology I. Between the grammar and physics of speech, ed. J. Kingston & M. E. Beckman. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Gordon, P. C. & Hendrick, R. (in press) The representation and processing of coreference in discourse. Cognitive Science. [PCG] (1997) Intuitive knowledge of linguistic co-reference. Cognition 62:325-70.
  16. Harley, T. A. & Brown, H. (1998) What causes tip-of-the-tongue states? British Journal of Psychology 89:151-74.
  17. Hervey, S. & Higgins, I. (1992) Thinking translation: A course in translation method. Routledge.
  18. Kuçera, H. & Francis, W. N. (1967) Computational analysis of present day English. Brown University Press.
  19. Liberman, A. (1996) Speech: A special code. MIT Press.
  20. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Levy, W. & Tyler, L. K. (1982) Producing interpretable discourse: The establishment and maintenance of reference. In: Speech, place, and action, ed. R. Jarvella & W. Klein. Wiley.
  21. McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981) An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: 1. An account of the basic findings. Psychological Review 88:357-407.
  22. Mehler, J., Altmann, G., Sebastian, N., Dupoux, E., Christophe, A. & Pallier, C. (1993) Understanding compressed sentences: The role of rhythm and meaning. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 682:272-82.
  23. aWJML, PAS] (1997) Word form generation in language production. In: Speech production: Motor control, brain research and fluency disorders, ed. W. Hulstijn, H. F. M. Peters & P. H. H. M. van Lieshout. Elsevier. [aWJML]
  24. Minsky, M. & Papert, S. (1969) Perceptrons. MIT Press.
  25. O'Seaghdha, P. G., Dell, G. S., Peterson, R. R. & Juliano, C. (1992) Modelling form-related priming effects in comprehension and production. In: Connectionist approaches to language processing, vol. 1, ed. R. Reilly & N. E. Sharkey. Erlbaum.
  26. Peterson, R. R., Dell, G. S. & O'Sheaghdha, P. G. (1989) A connectionist model of form-related priming effects. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 196-203. Erlbaum.
  27. Potter, M. C. (1983) Representational buffers: The eye-mind hypothesis in picture perception, reading, and visual search. In: Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes, ed. K. Rayner. Academic Press.
  28. Pulvermüller, F. (1992) Constituents of a neurological theory of language. Concepts in Neuroscience 3:157-200. [FP] (1995) Agrammatism: Behavioral description and neurobiological explanation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 7:165-81. [FP] (1996) Hebb's concept of cell assemblies and the psychophysiology of word processing. Psychophysiology 33:317-33.
  29. 1994) On-line versus off-line priming of word-form encoding in spoken word production. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. A. Ram & K. Eiselt. Erlbaum. [aWJML] (1996a) Computational models of lemma retrieval. In: Computational psycholinguistics: AI and connectionist models of human language processing, ed. T. Dijkstra & K. De Smedt. Taylor and Francis. [aWJML] (1996b) Serial order in planning the production of successive morphemes of a word. Journal of Memory and Language 35:854-76.
  30. Romani, C. (1992) The representation of prosodic and syllabic structure in speech production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.
  31. Rossi, M. & Defare, E. P. (1995) Lapsis linguae: Word errors or phonological errors? International Journal of Psycholinguistics 11:5-38.
  32. Rumelhart, D. E. & McClelland, J. L. (1982) An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review 89:60-94.
  33. Santiago, J. (1997) Estructura sil bica y activation secuencial en produccion del lenguaje. [Syllable structure and sequential activation in language production]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department Psicologia Experimental y Fisiologia del Comportamiento, Universidad de Granada, Spain.
  34. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S. & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990) Exploring the time course of lexical access in speech production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language 29:86-102.
  35. Selkirk, E. (1984) Phonology and syntax. MIT Press.
  36. Semenza, C., Luzzatti, C. & Carabelli, S. (1997) Naming disorders for compounds in aphasia: A study in Italian. Journal of Neurolinguistics 10:33-43.
  37. Sereno, J. (1994) Phonosyntactics. In: Sound symbolism, ed. L. Hinton, J. Nichols & J. J. Ohala. Cambridge University Press.
  38. Shapiro, K. L. & Raymond, J. E. (1994) Temporal allocation of visual attention: Inhibition or interference? In: Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language, ed. D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr. Academic Press.
  39. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1979) Speech errors as evidence for a serial-ordering mechanism in sentence production. In: Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett, ed. W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker. Erlbaum. [arWJML] (1983) Sublexical units and suprasegmental structure in speech production planning. In: The production of speech, ed. P. F. MacNeilage. Springer.
  40. Slobin, D. I. (1987) Thinking for speaking. In: Berkeley Linguistics Society: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting, ed. J. Aske, N. Beery, L. Michaelis & H. Filip. Berkeley Linguistics Society. [arWJML] (1996) From "thought and language" to "thinking for speaking." In: Rethinking linguistic relativity, ed.. J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson. Cambridge University Press. [rWJML] (1998) Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. Proceedings of the LAUD-Symposium, Duisburg.
  41. 1996b) Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22:896-918. [rWJML, PAS]
  42. Vanier, M. & Caplan, D. (1990) CT-scan correlates of agrammatism. In: Agrammatic aphasia. A cross-language narrative sourcebook, vol. 1, ed. L. Menn & L. K. Obler. John Benjamins. [FP]
  43. Weiss, S. & Rappelsberger, P. (1996) EEG coherence within the 13-18 Hz band as a correlate of a distinct lexical organization of concrete and abstract nouns in humans. Neuroscience Letters 209:17-20.
  44. Weiss, S., Müller, H. M. & Rappelsberger, P. (1998) Left frontal EEG coherence reflects modality independent language processes. Brain Topography 11(1). (in press). [HMM] (in press) EEG-coherence analysis of spoken names and nouns processing. Abstracts of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience.
  45. Wickens, J. R. (1993) A theory of the striatum. Pergamon Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Venue
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Published
1999-02
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
61-69
ISSN
  • 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1825
OpenAlex
W2082399936
Cited by
107
References
235
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Monash University
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
lexical access, word production, spreading activation, feedforward models, discourse production, morphophonology, aphasiology, neuroimaging of language, parsimony

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review