The Spatial and Temporal Signatures of Word Production Components: A Critical Update
Open accessAbstract
In the first decade of neurocognitive word production research the predominant approach was brain mapping, i.e., investigating the regional cerebral brain activation patterns correlated with word production tasks, such as picture naming and word generation. Indefrey and Levelt (2004) conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of word production studies that used this approach and combined the resulting spatial information on neural correlates of component processes of word production with information on the time course of word production provided by behavioral and electromagnetic studies. In recent years, neurocognitive word production research has seen a major change toward a hypothesis-testing approach. This approach is characterized by the design of experimental variables modulating single component processes of word production and testing for predicted effects on spatial or temporal neurocognitive signatures of these components. This change was accompanied by the development of a broader spectrum of measurement and analysis techniques. The article reviews the findings of recent studies using the new approach. The time course assumptions of Indefrey and Levelt (2004) have largely been confirmed requiring only minor adaptations. Adaptations of the brain structure/function relationships proposed by Indefrey and Levelt (2004) include the precise role of subregions of the left inferior frontal gyrus as well as a probable, yet to date unclear role of the inferior parietal cortex in word production.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In lab experiments, participants typically need 600 ms to 800 ms to name a line drawing of a common object.
“in lab experiments participants typically need 600 ms to 800 ms to name a line drawing of a common object”
From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Indefrey, 2011
In “The Time Course of the Component Processes in Word Production” (page unavailable), the paper reports a 600 ms estimate for picture naming and Table 1 includes several voice-onset times around 700–800 ms. It cautions that the 600 ms estimate came from repeated naming and that latencies vary substantially with the task and picture; it does not establish 600–800 ms as the typical range specifically for line drawings of common objects. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredUtterance planning is not instantaneous but requires substantial amounts of time.
“This is remarkable because utterance planning is not instantaneous but requires substantial amounts of time.”
From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Indefrey, 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain
Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,798 · see citing works
Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain
Laitinen, L. (1989) · Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/0303-8467(89)90128-5 · Cited by 7,565 · see citing works
The cortical organization of speech processing
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2113 · Cited by 5,495 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Secondly, the influential dualstream model of speech processing (Hickok and Poeppel, 2000, 2004, 2007) assumes an area at the boundary between temporal and parietal lobes (area Spt) to function as a sensorimotor interface in language production.”
BackgroundMethodA theory of lexical access in speech production [target paper]
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999) · Radboud Repository (Radboud University) · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99001776 · Cited by 5,173 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Levelt et al. (1999) assume this selection process to take place in a part of the mental lexicon (lemma level) that is linked to the conceptual level and contains information about the grammatical properties of words, such as word class or grammatical gender.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBinder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp055 · Cited by 4,060 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…prefrontal cortex, IFG, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and posterior cingulate gyrus) identified in a recent comprehensive meta-analysis by Binder et al., 2009, see also Schwartz et al., 2009, for an excellent discussion of the clinical evidence on regions involved in conceptual…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSpeaking. From Intention to Articulation
Caplan, D. N. (1990) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90151-y · Cited by 4,036 · see citing works
Speed of processing in the human visual system
Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381520a0 · Cited by 3,538 · see citing works
A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.
Dell, G. S. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.93.3.283 · Cited by 3,236 · cited 3× · see citing works
“With respect to the insula, this pattern of reports is better compatible with a role in articulatory planning as suggested by Dronkers (1996) than a role in articulatory execution.”
BackgroundDRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.204 · Cited by 3,178 · see citing works
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.011 · Cited by 2,212 · cited 4× · see citing works
“, 1996; Hirano et al., 1997). An involvement of the bilateral STG in the internal loop of self-monitoring is suggested by data from Shergill et al. (2002) who manipulated the rate of inner speech. More recently, Tourville et al. (2008) used feedback with a shifted first formant frequency and applied SEM to the resulti…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe spatial and temporal signatures of word production components
Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001 · Cited by 2,144 · cited 8× · see citing works
“Keywords: language production, word production, picture naming, neuroimaging”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationCognition and anatomy in three variants of primary progressive aphasia
Gorno‐Tempini, M. L., Dronkers, N. F., Rankin, K. P., Ogar, J. M., Phengrasamy, L., Rosen, H. J., Johnson, J. K., Weiner, M. W., & Miller, B. L. (2004) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.10825 · Cited by 1,608 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Gorno-Tempini and colleagues (Gorno-Tempini et al., 2004, 2008; Henry and Gorno-Tempini, 2010; Wilson et al., 2010) described a so-called logopenic variant of PPA in which mainly gray matter in the mid to posterior temporal lobe is affected1.”
BackgroundMeta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: method and validation
Turkeltaub, P. E., Eden, G. F., Jones, K. M., & Zeffiro, T. A. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1131 · Cited by 1,604 · see citing works
Ventral and dorsal pathways for language
Saur, D., Kreher, B. W., Schnell, S., Kümmerer, D., Kellmeyer, P., Vry, M., Umarova, R. M., Musso, M., Glauche, V., Abel, S., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0805234105 · Cited by 1,555 · see citing works
Cortical language localization in left, dominant hemisphere
Ojemann, G. A., Ojemann, J. G., Lettich, E., & Berger, M. S. (1989) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1989.71.3.0316 · Cited by 1,491 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…brain areas in which transient lesions induced by electrocortical or TMS stimulation reliably interfered with picture naming across seven studies (Ojemann, 1983; Ojemann et al., 1989; Schäffler et al., 1993; Haglund et al., 1994; Malow et al., 1996; Hamberger et al., 2001; Stewart et al., 2001).”
BackgroundLexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers.
Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.4.801 · Cited by 1,489 · cited 3× · see citing works
“COMPONENT PROCESSES OF WORD PRODUCTION Models of language production (Garrett, 1980; Stemberger, 1985; Dell, 1986; Butterworth, 1989; Levelt, 1989; Caramazza, 1997; Dell et al., 1997; Levelt et al., 1999) agree that there are processing levels of meaning, form, and articulation.”
BackgroundMethodOn Broca, brain, and binding: A new framework
Hagoort, P. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.004 · Cited by 1,411 · see citing works
A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking
Roelofs, A. (1992) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-f · Cited by 1,192 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The I&L estimate for the duration of lemma retrieval was based on mathematical modeling of the semantic interference effect (Levelt et al., 1991; Roelofs, 1992), suggesting a lemma retrieval duration of 100–150 ms and electrophysiological data by Schmitt et al. (2001) suggesting that grammatical…”
MethodA new brain region for coordinating speech articulation
Dronkers, N. F. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/384159a0 · Cited by 1,192 · cited 1× · see citing works
“With respect to the insula, this pattern of reports is better compatible with a role in articulatory planning as suggested by Dronkers (1996) than a role in articulatory execution.”
How Many Levels of Processing Are There in Lexical Access?
Caramazza, A. (1997) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/026432997381664 · Cited by 1,165 · cited 3× · see citing works
“COMPONENT PROCESSES OF WORD PRODUCTION Models of language production (Garrett, 1980; Stemberger, 1985; Dell, 1986; Butterworth, 1989; Levelt, 1989; Caramazza, 1997; Dell et al., 1997; Levelt et al., 1999) agree that there are processing levels of meaning, form, and articulation.”
BackgroundTowards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception
Hickok, G. S., & Poeppel, D. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01463-7 · Cited by 1,136 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Secondly, the influential dualstream model of speech processing (Hickok and Poeppel, 2000, 2004, 2007) assumes an area at the boundary between temporal and parietal lobes (area Spt) to function as a sensorimotor interface in language production.”
BackgroundMethodLevels of processing in sentence production
Garrett, M. F. (1980) · Max Planck Digital Library · Cited by 771 · see citing works
Brain organization for language from the perspective of electrical stimulation mapping
Ojemann, G. A. (1983) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00015491 · Cited by 714 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…brain areas in which transient lesions induced by electrocortical or TMS stimulation reliably interfered with picture naming across seven studies (Ojemann, 1983; Ojemann et al., 1989; Schäffler et al., 1993; Haglund et al., 1994; Malow et al., 1996; Hamberger et al., 2001; Stewart et al., 2001).”
BackgroundThe logopenic/phonological variant of primary progressive aphasia
Gorno‐Tempini, M., Brambati, S. M., Ginex, V., Ogar, J., Dronkers, N. F., Marcone, A., Perani, D., Garibotto, V., Cappa, S. F., & Miller, B. L. (2008) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000320506.79811.da · Cited by 700 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…is characterized by anomia and phonemic paraphasias in confrontation naming, an impairment of verbal short-term memory functions, and an absence of the phonological similarity effect on letter recall, whereas conceptual knowledge seems to be relatively unaffected (Gorno-Tempini et al., 2008).”
BackgroundNeural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech
Tourville, J. A., Reilly, K. J., & Guenther, F. H. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.054 · Cited by 649 · see citing works
The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming.
Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H. J., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A. S., Pechmann, T., & Havinga, J. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.1.122 · Cited by 636 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The I&L estimate for the duration of lemma retrieval was based on mathematical modeling of the semantic interference effect (Levelt et al., 1991; Roelofs, 1992), suggesting a lemma retrieval duration of 100–150 ms and electrophysiological data by Schmitt et al. (2001) suggesting that grammatical…”
MethodConnected speech production in three variants of primary progressive aphasia
Wilson, S. M., Henry, M. L., Besbris, M., Ogar, J. M., Dronkers, N. F., Jarrold, W., Miller, B. L., & Gorno-Tempini, M. L. (2010) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awq129 · Cited by 546 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Gorno-Tempini and colleagues (Gorno-Tempini et al., 2004, 2008; Henry and Gorno-Tempini, 2010; Wilson et al., 2010) described a so-called logopenic variant of PPA in which mainly gray matter in the mid to posterior temporal lobe is affected1.”
BackgroundBrain regions involved in articulation
Wise, R., Greene, J., Büchel, C., & Scott, S. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)07491-1 · Cited by 517 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…IFG (Broca’s area) was the only remaining core area that was not more often reported in experiments using overt responses (see Murphy et al., 1997; Wise et al., 1999; Huang et al., 2001; and more recently Ackermann and Riecker, 2004, for the absence of Broca’s area activation in direct…”
BackgroundBilingual language control: an event-related brain potential study.
Christoffels, I., Firk, C., & Schiller, N. (2007) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.137 · Cited by 509 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Christoffels et al., 2007b, see also van de Ven et al., 2009) studied self-monitoring using verbal feedback without distortion.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCortical Localization of Temporal Lobe Language Sites in Patients with Gliomas
Haglund, M. M., Berger, M. S., Shamseldin, M., Lettich, E., & Ojemann, G. A. (1994) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/00006123-199404000-00001 · Cited by 455 · cited 2× · see citing works
“To find out which of these regions are in fact necessary for word production (rather than just somehow involved), Indefrey (2007) compared them with brain areas in which transient lesions induced by electrocortical or TMS stimulation reliably interfered with picture naming across seven studies (Ojemann, 1983; Ojemann…”
BackgroundSequential Processing of Lexical, Grammatical, and Phonological Information Within Broca’s Area
Sahin, N. T., Pinker, S., Cash, S. S., Schomer, D., & Halgren, E. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1174481 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model.
Dell, G. S., Burger, L. K., & Svec, W. R. (1997) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.1.123 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words
Gaskell, M. G., & Dumay, N. (2003) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00070-2 · Cited by 399 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Gaskell and Dumay (2003) showed that pseudowords only become fully integrated in the lexicon, i.e., showing competition effects on phonologically similar words) after consolidation during a sleep phase.”
BackgroundDynamics of brain activation during picture naming
Salmelin, R. H., Hari, R., Lounasmaa, O. V., et al. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/368463a0 · Cited by 381 · cited 3× · see citing works
“To date, four MEG studies (Salmelin et al., 1994; Levelt et al., 1998; Sörös et al., 2003; Hultén et al., 2009) provide timing data on the activation of posterior STG and MTG.”
BackgroundMethodSchwartz, M. F., Kimberg, D. Y., Walker, G. M., Faseyitan, O. K., Brecher, A. R., Dell, G. S., & Coslett, H. B. (2009) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awp284 · Cited by 379 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Analyzing data from 64 aphasic patients, Schwartz et al. (2009) found a significant association between semantic errors in language production and lesions in three cortical areas: the left prefrontal lobe, the left posterior MTG, and the left anterior to mid MTG. Importantly, after factoring out…”
BackgroundEffects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words.
Damian, M., Vigliocco, G., & Levelt, W. (2001) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00135-4 · Cited by 351 · cited 4× · see citing works
“It is, therefore, fortunate, that one of the first studies using a hypothesis-testing approach in an fMRI experiment on word production (de Zubicaray et al., 2001) investigated the neural correlates of lemma selection. They used a semantic picture-word interference paradigm. In this paradigm, competition at the lemma…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe contribution of the insula to motor aspects of speech production: A review and a hypothesis
Ackermann, H., & Riecker, A. (2004) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00347-x · Cited by 343 · cited 11× · see citing works
“, 2001; and more recently Ackermann and Riecker, 2004, for the absence of Broca’s area activation in direct comparisons of overt and covert responses). The somewhat indirect conclusion that Broca’s area is the most likely candidate area for syllabification has more recently been challenged for different reasons. First…”
BackgroundInfluentialfMRI reveals two distinct cerebral networks subserving speech motor control
Riecker, A., Mathiak, K., Wildgruber, D., Erb, M., Hertrich, I., Grodd, W., & Ackermann, H. (2005) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000152156.90779.89 · Cited by 327 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In another study, insular activation increased linearly with syllable repetition rate (Riecker et al., 2005).”
BackgroundAn MEG Study of Picture Naming
Levelt, W. J. M., Praamstra, P., Meyer, A. S., Helenius, P., & Salmelin, R. H. (1998) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892998562960 · Cited by 301 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To date, four MEG studies (Salmelin et al., 1994; Levelt et al., 1998; Sörös et al., 2003; Hultén et al., 2009) provide timing data on the activation of posterior STG and MTG.”
BackgroundStrijkers, K., Costa, A., & Thierry, G. (2010) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp153 · Cited by 299 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Both in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and in electroencephalography (EEG) methods have been developed that allow for overt speaking during experiments (for fMRI see, e.g., de Zubicaray et al., 2001; Grabowski et al., 2006; Christoffels et al., 2007b; Heim et al., 2009b; Hocking et al., 2009; for EEG see…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLearning and Consolidation of Novel Spoken Words
Davis, M. H., Betta, A. M. D., Macdonald, M. J. E., & Gaskell, M. G. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21059 · Cited by 293 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Davis et al. (2008) linked this behavioral effect to changes in hemodynamic activation.”
BackgroundMonitoring the Time Course of Phonological Encoding
Wheeldon, L. R., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1995) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1014 · Cited by 286 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Wheeldon and Levelt (1995) measured a 125 ms difference between RTs for the first and the last phoneme of bisyllabic words with on average six phonemes. van Turennout et al. (1997) measured a corresponding 80 ms difference for words with on average 4.5 phonemes.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialLexical Access in Speech Production
Butterworth, B. L. (1989) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4213.003.0007 · Cited by 285 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Based on the comparison of chronometric data from reaction time studies, modeling data, and electrophysiological studies, I&L provided the following estimates for the duration of the different processing components in the picture naming task: Conceptual preparation (from picture onset to selection…”
BackgroundMethodSpeed of processing in the human visual system
Thorpe, S. J., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72148-8 · Cited by 281 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The I&L estimate for the duration of conceptual preparation until the selection of a target concept was based on data showing the availability of information about whether a picture showed an animal or not (Thorpe et al., 1996, around 150 ms; Schmitt et al., 2000, around 200 ms).”
BackgroundMethodBrain Activity During Speaking: From Syntax to Phonology in 40 Milliseconds
van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5363.572 · Cited by 275 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The I&L estimate for the duration of phonological code retrieval was based on the difference between the lateralized readiness potential (LRP) onsets for a grammatical gender compared to a first phoneme decision in a study by van Turennout et al. (1998).”
MethodThe neural correlates of language production
Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2000) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Self-citationFunctional neuroanatomy of verbal self-monitoring
McGuire, P. K., Silbersweig, D., & Frith, C. (1996) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/119.3.907 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Neural correlates of verbal feedback processing: an fMRI study employing overt speech
Christoffels, I. K., Formisano, E., & Schiller, N. O. (2007) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20315 · Cited by 254 · cited 7× · see citing works
“Christoffels et al., 2007b, see also van de Ven et al., 2009) studied self-monitoring using verbal feedback without distortion.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA systems perspective on the effective connectivity of overt speech production
Eickhoff, S. B., Heim, S., Zilles, K., & Amunts, K. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2008.0287 · Cited by 252 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…the interaction between brain areas (structural equation modeling, SEM; dynamic causal modeling, DCM, independent component analysis, ICA) have begun to be applied to word production (Saur et al., 2008; Tourville et al., 2008; Eickhoff et al., 2009; Heim et al., 2009a; van de Ven et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodComprehending written language: a blueprint of the reader
Perfetti, C. A. (2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198507932.003.0006 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Some neurophysiological constraints on models of word naming
Binder, J. R., Medler, D. A., Desai, R. H., Conant, L. L., & Liebenthal, E. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.029 · Cited by 232 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A more recent study by Binder et al. (2005) suggests that this area and the adjacent angular gyrus can even be deactivated for pseudoword reading compared to a fixation condition.”
BackgroundThe time course of word retrieval revealed by event-related brain potentials during overt speech
Costa, A., Strijkers, K., Martin, C. D., & Thierry, G. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0908921106 · Cited by 225 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…for overt speaking during experiments (for fMRI see, e.g., de Zubicaray et al., 2001; Grabowski et al., 2006; Christoffels et al., 2007b; Heim et al., 2009b; Hocking et al., 2009; for EEG see, e.g., Christoffels et al., 2007a; Koester and Schiller, 2008; Costa et al., 2009; Strijkers et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMethodComparing cortical activations for silent and overt speech using event-related fMRI
Huang, J., Carr, T. H., & Cao, Y. (2002) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.1060 · Cited by 216 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…was the only remaining core area that was not more often reported in experiments using overt responses (see Murphy et al., 1997; Wise et al., 1999; Huang et al., 2001; and more recently Ackermann and Riecker, 2004, for the absence of Broca’s area activation in direct comparisons of overt and…”
BackgroundSpatiotemporal imaging of cortical activation during verb generation and picture naming
Edwards, E., Nagarajan, S. S., Dalal, S. S., Canolty, R. T., Kirsch, H. E., Barbaro, N. M., & Knight, R. T. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.035 · Cited by 213 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…studies (e.g., Sörös et al., 2003; Hultén et al., 2009) and the use of intracranial electrophysiology in neurosurgical patients (Sahin et al., 2009; Edwards et al., 2010) the main development has been the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a tool for temporarily stimulating or…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialde Zubicaray, G. I., Wilson, S. J., McMahon, K. L., & Muthiah, S. (2001) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.1054 · Cited by 210 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…imaging (fMRI) and in electroencephalography (EEG) methods have been developed that allow for overt speaking during experiments (for fMRI see, e.g., de Zubicaray et al., 2001; Grabowski et al., 2006; Christoffels et al., 2007b; Heim et al., 2009b; Hocking et al., 2009; for EEG see, e.g.,…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialvan Turennout, M., Peter Hagoort, A., & Brown, C. M. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.23.4.787 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
An fMRI investigation of covertly and overtly produced mono- and multisyllabic words
SHUSTER, L., & LEMIEUX, S. (2005) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.07.007 · Cited by 205 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Shuster and Lemieux (2005) compared the overt production of multisyllabic words to the production of monosyllabic words.”
BackgroundSchmitt, B., Münte, T. F., & Marta Kutas, A. (2000) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3740473 · Cited by 201 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…information taken from Rodriguez-Fornells et al. (2002), Guo et al. (2005), and Hanulová et al. (2011) were approximately 170, 140, and 90 ms. Schmitt et al. (2000) reported a N200 peak difference of 90 ms. Adding the estimate of 200 ms for conceptual preparation, these numbers suggest an…”
BackgroundA Common Neural Substrate for Language Production and Verbal Working Memory
Acheson, D. J., Hamidi, M., Binder, J. R., & Postle, B. R. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21519 · Cited by 194 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Acheson et al. (2011) found a significant facilitating TMS effect on response latencies when the left mid MTG but not when the left posterior STG was stimulated between 100 ms before and 200 ms after picture onset.”
BackgroundInfluentialMaess, B., Friederici, A., Damian, M., Meyer, A., & Levelt, W. (2002) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892902317361967 · Cited by 193 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Lexical selection in word production was also targeted in an MEG study on picture naming (Maess et al., 2002) by use of the semantic category interference paradigm.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFrom phonemes to articulatory codes: an fMRI study of the role of Broca's area in speech production
Papoutsi, M., de Zwart, J. A., Jansma, J. M., Pickering, M. J., Bednar, J. A., & Horwitz, B. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn239 · Cited by 190 · cited 3× · see citing works
“To date only one study (Papoutsi et al., 2009) used an experimental variable (biphone frequency) that convincingly disentangles syllabification from later phonetic and motor processing stages and confirmed a pattern predicted for syllabification in a subregion of Broca’s area.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOn the Tip-of-the-Tongue: Neural Correlates of Increased Word-finding Failures in Normal Aging
Shafto, M. A., Burke, D. M., Stamatakis, E. A., Tam, P. P., & TYLER, L. K. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.2060 · Cited by 184 · cited 1× · see citing works
“By contrast Shafto et al. (2007) found age-related word finding problems to be correlated with gray matter atrophy in the left insula but not the posterior temporal lobe.”
BackgroundThe Left Posterior Superior Temporal Gyrus Participates Specifically in Accessing Lexical Phonology
Graves, W. W., Grabowski, T. J., Mehta, S. H., & Gupta, P. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20113 · Cited by 183 · cited 6× · see citing works
“A third recent development in fMRI research on word production is the use of repetition suppression or adaptation paradigms (e.g., Graves et al., 2008; Peeva et al., 2010).”
MethodInfluentialModulation of activity in temporal cortex during generation of inner speech
Shergill, S. S., Brammer, M. J., Fukuda, R., Bullmore, E., Amaro, E., Murray, R. M., & McGuire, P. K. (2002) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.10046 · Cited by 182 · cited 1× · see citing works
“An involvement of the bilateral STG in the internal loop of self-monitoring is suggested by data from Shergill et al. (2002) who manipulated the rate of inner speech.”
BackgroundGraves, W. W., Grabowski, T. J., Mehta, S., & Gordon, J. K. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.4.617 · Cited by 178 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Graves et al. (2007) manipulated three variables (lexical frequency, object familiarity, and word length) to study effects at lexical phonological, semantic, and articulatory processing stages.”
BackgroundMethodEffect of word and syllable frequency on activation during lexical decision and reading aloud
Carreiras, M., Mechelli, A., & Price, C. J. (2006) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20236 · Cited by 149 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Carreiras et al. (2006) also favor a role in articulatory planning based on their finding of a syllable frequency effect in the left anterior insula.”
BackgroundCerebral areas associated with motor control of speech in humans
Murphy, K., Corfield, D. R., Guz, A., Fink, G. R., Wise, R. J. S., Harrison, J., & Adams, L. (1997) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1997.83.5.1438 · Cited by 149 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Peeva et al. (2010) found fMRI adaptation for repeated syllables in the left ventral premotor cortex, suggesting syllablelevel representations in this region.”
BackgroundElectrophysiological Chronometry of Semantic Context Effects in Language Production
Aristei, S., Melinger, A., & Rahman, R. A. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21474 · Cited by 141 · cited 4× · see citing works
“In a complex design combining semantic blocking and picture-word interference, Aristei et al. (2011) found increases in naming latencies of category coordinates for both manipulations.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAnatomic dissociation of auditory and visual naming in the lateral temporal cortex
Hamberger, M. J., Goodman, R. R., Perrine, K. R., & Tamny, T. R. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.56.1.56 · Cited by 140 · cited 2× · see citing works
“To find out which of these regions are in fact necessary for word production (rather than just somehow involved), Indefrey (2007) compared them with brain areas in which transient lesions induced by electrocortical or TMS stimulation reliably interfered with picture naming across seven studies (Ojemann, 1983; Ojemann…”
BackgroundMorphological priming in overt language production: Electrophysiological evidence from Dutch
Koester, D., & Schiller, N. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.06.043 · Cited by 138 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…for overt speaking during experiments (for fMRI see, e.g., de Zubicaray et al., 2001; Grabowski et al., 2006; Christoffels et al., 2007b; Heim et al., 2009b; Hocking et al., 2009; for EEG see, e.g., Christoffels et al., 2007a; Koester and Schiller, 2008; Costa et al., 2009; Strijkers et al., 2010).”
BackgroundPeeva, M. G., Guenther, F. H., Tourville, J. A., Nieto-Castanon, A., Anton, J.-L., Nazarian, B., & Alario, F.-X. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.065 · Cited by 135 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The study of Peeva et al. (2010) is a nice example of this approach.”
Backgroundvan Turennout, M., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.4.787 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Heim, S., Eickhoff, S. B., & Amunts, K. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.044 · Cited by 123 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…the interaction between brain areas (structural equation modeling, SEM; dynamic causal modeling, DCM, independent component analysis, ICA) have begun to be applied to word production (Saur et al., 2008; Tourville et al., 2008; Eickhoff et al., 2009; Heim et al., 2009a; van de Ven et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodHanulová, J., Davidson, D. J., & Indefrey, P. (2010) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690965.2010.509946 · Cited by 119 · cited 4× · see citing works
“In a study by Hanulová et al. (2011) N200 nogo responses were contingent on a man-made/natural decision, showing an N200 onset latency of around 300 ms. Note that the latency of N200 responses includes the time needed for the decision to withhold the button press, so that the information on which…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationBrain regions underlying word finding difficulties in temporal lobe epilepsy
Trébuchon, A., Guedj, É., Alario, F. ‐., Laguitton, V., MUNDLER, O., Chauvel, P., & Liégeois‐Chauvel, C. (2009) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awp083 · Cited by 113 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In patients with temporal lobe epilepsy, Trebuchon-Da Fonseca et al. (2009) found a relationship between TOT states and reduced resting-state metabolism (measured with 18-fluoro-2-desoxy-dglucose-PET) in the left inferior parietal lobe and the posterior superior and inferior temporal cortex.”
Schmitt, B., Schiltz, K., Zaake, W., Marta Kutas, A., & Münte, T. F. (2001) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/08989290152001925 · Cited by 112 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…interference effect (Levelt et al., 1991; Roelofs, 1992), suggesting a lemma retrieval duration of 100–150 ms and electrophysiological data by Schmitt et al. (2001) suggesting that grammatical gender information is available about 75 ms later than conceptual information about the physical…”
BackgroundWilson, S. M., Isenberg, A. L., & Hickok, G. (2009) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20782 · Cited by 110 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This study, thus, provides much stronger support than previous studies for an involvement of anterior to mid temporal regions in lemma selection, which had been called into question by some authors (e.g., Wilson et al., 2009).”
BackgroundResultRiecker, A., Ackermann, H., Wildgruber, D., Meyer, J., Dogil, G., Haider, H., & Grodd, W. (2000) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2356 · Cited by 110 · cited 1× · see citing works
“By contrast, Ackermann and Riecker (2004) and Riecker et al. (2000) directly compared overt and covert responses and found insular activation only for overt responses.”
BackgroundRodríguez‐Fornells, A. (2002) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00188-9 · Cited by 108 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Two more recent studies (Rodriguez-Fornells et al., 2002; Guo et al., 2005) also used paradigms in which go/nogo responses were contingent on an animal/object decision.”
BackgroundResultde Zubicaray, G. I., McMahon, K. L., Eastburn, M., & Pringle, A. J. (2006) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20227 · Cited by 108 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In a more recent study, de Zubicaray et al., 2006, see, however, Abel et al., 2009, for a negative finding in left mid MTG in a similar contrast) ruled out this possible concern by showing increased mid STG and posterior STG activation for the naming of target words that were preceded by the…”
BackgroundCortical processing mechanism for vocalization with auditory verbal feedback
Hirano, S., Kojima, H., Naito, Y., Honjo, I., Kamoto, Y., Okazawa, H., Ishizu, K., Yonekura, Y., Nagahama, Y., Fukuyama, H., et al. (1997) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-199707070-00055 · Cited by 107 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…the bilateral STG in the external loop of self-monitoring based on studies showing additional bilateral superior temporal activations by distorting the subjects’ feedback of their own voice or presenting the subjects with alien feedback while they spoke (McGuire et al., 1996; Hirano et al., 1997).”
BackgroundMultiple perspectives on word production
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99451775 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Sörös, P., Cornelissen, K. K., Laine, M., & Salmelin, R. H. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00217-9 · Cited by 105 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Including more recent MEG and TMS studies there are now five studies providing temporal data on left IFG activation in picture naming (Salmelin et al., 1994; Sörös et al., 2003; Vihla et al., 2006; Hultén et al., 2009; Schuhmann et al., 2009) summarized in Table 3.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLearning new names for new objects: Cortical effects as measured by magnetoencephalography☆
Cornelissen, K. K., Laine, M., Renvall, K., et al. (2004) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2003.12.007 · Cited by 103 · cited 3× · see citing works
“In an fMRI study using the picture-word interference paradigm, de Zubicaray et al. (2002) targeted lexical word form retrieval by using distractor words that were phonologically related to the picture names.”
MethodResultWhat the Brain Does before the Tongue Slips
Moller, J., Jansma, B. M., Rodríguez‐Fornells, A., & Münte, T. F. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl028 · Cited by 100 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The SMA and/or the anterior cingulum also seem to be involved in internal speech monitoring (Möller et al., 2007).”
BackgroundCortical dynamics of visual/semantic vs. phonological analysis in picture confrontation
Vihla, M., Laine, M., & Salmelin, R. H. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.040 · Cited by 98 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Including more recent MEG and TMS studies there are now five studies providing temporal data on left IFG activation in picture naming (Salmelin et al., 1994; Sörös et al., 2003; Vihla et al., 2006; Hultén et al., 2009; Schuhmann et al., 2009) summarized in Table 3.”
MethodSeeing what we know and understand: How knowledge shapes perception
Rahman, R. A., & Sommer, W. (2008) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.15.6.1055 · Cited by 94 · cited 4× · see citing works
“However, as shown by Abdel Rahman and Sommer (2003), the relatively late availability of more peripheral conceptual information, such as the kind of food an animal prefers, does not delay lemma and word form retrieval, suggesting that conceptual processing continues to run in parallel with subsequent processing stages.”
BackgroundInfluentialde Zubicaray, G. I., McMahon, K. L., Eastburn, M., & Wilson, S. J. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1135 · Cited by 92 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In an fMRI study using the picture-word interference paradigm, de Zubicaray et al. (2002) targeted lexical word form retrieval by using distractor words that were phonologically related to the picture names.”
BackgroundMethodThe separation of processing stages in a lexical interference fMRI-paradigm
Abel, S., Dressel, K., Bitzer, R., Kümmerer, D., Mader, I., Weiller, C., & Huber, W. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.018 · Cited by 90 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In a more recent study, de Zubicaray et al., 2006, see, however, Abel et al., 2009, for a negative finding in left mid MTG in a similar contrast) ruled out this possible concern by showing increased mid STG and posterior STG activation for the naming of target words that were preceded by the…”
BackgroundThe logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia
Henry, M., & Gorno-Tempini, M. (2010) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/wco.0b013e32833fb93e · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Hocking, J., McMahon, K. L., & de Zubicaray, G. I. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21114 · Cited by 87 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Using a similar paradigm in an arterial spin labeling fMRI study with overt naming, Hocking et al. (2009) observed hippocampal and left mid to posterior STG activation but no mid MTG activation in the semantic blocking condition (see Frontiers in Psychology | Language Sciences October 2011 | Volume…”
BackgroundMethodComprehension deficits elicited by electrical stimulation of Broca's area
Schäffler, L., Lüders, H. O., Dinner, D. S., Lesser, R. P., & Chelune, G. J. (1993) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/116.3.695 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Left posterior BA37 is involved in object recognition: a TMS study
Stewart, L., Meyer, B.-U., Uta Frith, A., & Rothwell, J. C. (2001) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00084-1 · Cited by 83 · cited 2× · see citing works
“To find out which of these regions are in fact necessary for word production (rather than just somehow involved), Indefrey (2007) compared them with brain areas in which transient lesions induced by electrocortical or TMS stimulation reliably interfered with picture naming across seven studies (Ojemann, 1983; Ojemann…”
BackgroundCortical Stimulation Elicits Regional Distinctions in Auditory and Visual Naming
Malow, B. A., Blaxton, T. A., Sato, S., et al. (1996) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1996.tb00020.x · Cited by 82 · cited 2× · see citing works
“To find out which of these regions are in fact necessary for word production (rather than just somehow involved), Indefrey (2007) compared them with brain areas in which transient lesions induced by electrocortical or TMS stimulation reliably interfered with picture naming across seven studies (Ojemann, 1983; Ojemann…”
BackgroundThe temporal characteristics of functional activation in Broca's area during overt picture naming
Schuhmann, T., Schiller, N. O., Goebel, R., et al. (2008) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.10.013 · Cited by 82 · cited 7× · see citing works
“, 2010) the main development has been the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a tool for temporarily stimulating or interfering with neuronal activity in specific brain regions at a specific time (Schuhmann et al., 2009; Acheson et al., 2011).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAccessing newly learned names and meanings in the native language
Hultén, A., Vihla, M., Laine, M., et al. (2008) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20561 · Cited by 73 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Including more recent MEG and TMS studies there are now five studies providing temporal data on left IFG activation in picture naming (Salmelin et al., 1994; Sörös et al., 2003; Vihla et al., 2006; Hultén et al., 2009; Schuhmann et al., 2009) summarized in Table 3.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialvan de Ven, V., Esposito, F., & Christoffels, I. K. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.057 · Cited by 72 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…the interaction between brain areas (structural equation modeling, SEM; dynamic causal modeling, DCM, independent component analysis, ICA) have begun to be applied to word production (Saur et al., 2008; Tourville et al., 2008; Eickhoff et al., 2009; Heim et al., 2009a; van de Ven et al., 2009).”
BackgroundBrain-imaging studies of language production
Indefrey, P. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568971.013.0033 · Cited by 71 · cited 8× · see citing works
“Indefrey and Levelt (2000, 2004, see also Indefrey, 2007) conducted comprehensive meta-analyses of word production studies that had used the mapping approach. They first analyzed the tasks with respect to lead-in processes preceding word production and core word production processes as assumed by psycholinguistic mode…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationPeter Hagoort, A., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1181675 · Cited by 66 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Considering that this activation was sensitive to word-frequency and that I&L suggested a time window for lemma selection between 175 and 250 ms, the authors (and also Hagoort and Levelt, 2009) interpreted this result as indicating a role of Broca’s area in lexical access in word production.”
ResultName agreement in picture naming: an ERP study.
Cheng, X.-R., Schafer, G., & Akyürek, E. (2010) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.03.003 · Cited by 59 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Results from an ERP study comparing the naming of pictures with high and low name agreement (Cheng et al., 2010) also show an early effect (100–150 ms) probably due to object recognition difficulty being one source of low name agreement.”
Naming of newly learned objects: A PET activation study
Gronholm, P. C., Rinne, J. O., Vorobyev, V., & Laine, M. (2005) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.06.010 · Cited by 59 · cited 4× · see citing works
“(2002), Guo et al. (2005), and Hanulová et al. (2011) also provided N200 onset times for first phoneme decisions around 460, 400, and 390 ms.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialTime Course of Evoked-potential Changes in Different Forms of Anomia in Aphasia
Laganaro, M., Morand, S. M., & Schnider, A. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21117 · Cited by 55 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Three other studies (Christoffels et al., 2007a; Laganaro et al., 2009b; Strijkers et al., 2010) investigated the time course of the electrophysiological effects of lexical frequency and cognate status (the target language name of the depicted object sounds/doesn’t sound similar in another language…”
BackgroundDoes phonological encoding in speech production always follow the retrieval of semantic knowledge?
Rahman, R. A., & Sommer, W. (2003) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00305-1 · Cited by 55 · cited 4× · see citing works
“However, as shown by Abdel Rahman and Sommer (2003), the relatively late availability of more peripheral conceptual information, such as the kind of food an animal prefers, does not delay lemma and word form retrieval, suggesting that conceptual processing continues to run in parallel with subsequent processing stages.”
BackgroundInfluentialLeft cytoarchitectonic area 44 supports selection in the mental lexicon during language production
Heim, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Friederici, A. D., & Amunts, K. (2009) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-009-0213-9 · Cited by 53 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…the interaction between brain areas (structural equation modeling, SEM; dynamic causal modeling, DCM, independent component analysis, ICA) have begun to be applied to word production (Saur et al., 2008; Tourville et al., 2008; Eickhoff et al., 2009; Heim et al., 2009a; van de Ven et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInterference and facilitation in overt speech production investigated with event-related potentials
Hirschfeld, G. H. F., Jansma, B. M., Bölte, J., et al. (2008) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/wnr.0b013e328309ecd1 · Cited by 53 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In this study, they, furthermore, showed additional activation of the anterior cingulate (see also Hirschfeld et al., 2008), and inferior prefrontal regions suggesting the involvement of top-down control processes in the naming of target words preceded by distractors.”
BackgroundA systems perspective on the effective connectivity of overt speech production
Eickhoff, S. B., Heim, S., Zilles, K., & Amunts, K. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(09)70789-x · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Dissociating verbal and nonverbal audiovisual object processing
Hocking, J., & Price, C. J. (2008) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.10.005 · Cited by 50 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…October 2011 | Volume 2 | Article 255 | 11 area may thus serve as a common store of lexical word form representations for word production and perception (see also Hocking and Price, 2009, for a lexical phonological effect on left posterior STG activation in comprehension).”
BackgroundSchiller, N. O., Bles, M., & Jansma, B. M. (2003) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00204-0 · Cited by 49 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…2011 | Volume 2 | Article 255 | 3 Table 1 | Continued Study Manipulation Onset/time window of effect (ms) Voice onset time (ms) Processing stage Schiller et al. (2003), ERP: N200 peak latencies Metrical (stress on first or second syllable) vs. syllabification (consonant in first or second…”
Lexical stress encoding in single word production estimated by event-related brain potentials
Schiller, N. O. (2006) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.027 · Cited by 47 · cited 3× · see citing works
“More recently Schiller (2006) measured an N200 peak difference of 58 ms between a lexical stress decision on the first and the second syllable of bisyllabic words, confirming earlier data by Wheeldon and Levelt (1995) and van Turennout et al. (1997) that suggested a phonological encoding duration…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialLaganaro, M., Morand, S., Schwitter, V., Zimmermann, C., Camen, C., & Schnider, A. (2009) · Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.09.007 · Cited by 45 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Three other studies (Christoffels et al., 2007a; Laganaro et al., 2009b; Strijkers et al., 2010) investigated the time course of the electrophysiological effects of lexical frequency and cognate status (the target language name of the depicted object sounds/doesn’t sound similar in another language…”
BackgroundMethodPhonological processing of ignored distractor pictures, an fMRI investigation
Bles, M., & Jansma, B. M. (2008) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-9-20 · Cited by 44 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Bles and Jansma (2008) manipulated the phonological relatedness of unattended distractor pictures and also found activation decreases in the left posterior STG when the distractor pictures were phonologically related.”
Neurophysiological correlates of linearization in language production
Habets, B., Jansma, B. M., & Münte, T. F. (2008) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-9-77 · Cited by 40 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Considering that this activation was sensitive to word-frequency and that I&L suggested a time window for lemma selection between 175 and 250 ms, the authors (and also Hagoort and Levelt, 2009) interpreted this result as indicating a role of Broca’s area in lexical access in word production. Note, however, that the ta…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialHuettig, F., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2008) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.36.2.341 · Cited by 31 · cited 3× · see citing works
“A good example in this respect is an eye-tracking study by Huettig and Hartsuiker (2008) who measured very long naming latencies of more than 2000 ms.”
BackgroundInfluentialZhang, Q., & Damian, M. F. (2009) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.06.015 · Cited by 26 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…et al. (2002), Guo et al. (2005), and Hanulová et al. (2011) also provided N200 onset times for first phoneme decisions around 460, 400, and 390 ms. Zhang and Damian (2009b) report an N200 onset around 290 ms. Camen et al. (2010) using temporal segmentation analysis observed much earlier ERP…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRole of left superior temporal gyrus during name recall process: An event-related fMRI study
Yagishita, S., Watanabe, T., Asari, T., Ito, H., Kato, M., Ikehira, H., Kanno, I., Suhara, T., & Kikyo, H. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.008 · Cited by 17 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Yagishita et al. (2008) asked their subjects to name famous faces during fMRI scanning.”
BackgroundCamen, C., Morand, S. M., & Laganaro, M. (2009) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-009-9124-4 · Cited by 16 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Camen et al. (2010) using temporal segmentation analysis observed much earlier ERP effects related to a decision on the first phoneme (210–290 ms). The median estimate of the five studies is 390 ms. N200 peak differences between the availability of semantic and first phoneme information taken from Rodriguez-Fornells e…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialExtrafoveal processing of objects in a naming task: Evidence from word probe experiments
Morgan, J. L., van Elswijk, G., & Meyer, A. S. (2008) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.15.3.561 · Cited by 13 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Evidence for the retrieval of word form information that does not rely on phoneme monitoring comes from a study by Morgan et al. (2008).”
BackgroundAdaptive pacing of visual stimulation for fMRI studies involving overt speech
Grabowski, T. J., Bauer, M. D., Foreman, D., Mehta, S. H., Eaton, B. L., Graves, W. W., Defoe, D. L., & Bolinger, L. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.064 · Cited by 13 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…(EEG) methods have been developed that allow for overt speaking during experiments (for fMRI see, e.g., de Zubicaray et al., 2001; Grabowski et al., 2006; Christoffels et al., 2007b; Heim et al., 2009b; Hocking et al., 2009; for EEG see, e.g., Christoffels et al., 2007a; Koester…”
MethodFunctional neuroanatomy of verbal self-monitoring
McGuire, P. K., Silbersweig, D. A., & Frith, C. D. (1996) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0924-9338(96)88510-5 · Cited by 12 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…the bilateral STG in the external loop of self-monitoring based on studies showing additional bilateral superior temporal activations by distorting the subjects’ feedback of their own voice or presenting the subjects with alien feedback while they spoke (McGuire et al., 1996; Hirano et al., 1997).”
BackgroundZhang, Q., & Damian, M. F. (2009) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.03.049 · Cited by 11 · cited 5× · see citing works
“…et al. (2002), Guo et al. (2005), and Hanulová et al. (2011) also provided N200 onset times for first phoneme decisions around 460, 400, and 390 ms. Zhang and Damian (2009b) report an N200 onset around 290 ms. Camen et al. (2010) using temporal segmentation analysis observed much earlier ERP…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPeeva, M. G., Guenther, F. H., Tourville, J. A., et al. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(09)71106-1 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Modulation of activity in temporal cortex during generation of inner speech
Shergill, S. S., Brammer, M. J., Fukuda, R., Bullmore, E. T., Murray, R. M., & McGuire, P. K. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(01)91943-3 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Opinion: The cortical organization of speech processing
Hickok, G. S., & Poeppel, D. (2007) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Ghosh (2008) · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0119
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 126 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Turn-taking in Human Communication – Origins and Implications for Language Processing
Levinson, S. C. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.010 · Cited by 760 · see citing works
“Moreover, the language production system is notoriously slow – preparation before output begins takes 600 ms for a single word if primed [7,8], approximately 1000 ms if not [9], and around 1500 ms for a short clause [10].”
Redefining the role of Broca’s area in speech
Flinker, A., Korzeniewska, A., Shestyuk, A. Y., Franaszczuk, P. J., Dronkers, N. F., Knight, R. T., & Crone, N. E. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1414491112 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
“Indefrey and Levelt viewed Broca’s area as critically involved in phonological processing whereas subsequent articulatory encoding is supported by motor cortices (4, 7).”
BackgroundPredicting while comprehending language: A theory and review.
Pickering, M. J., & Gambi, C. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000158 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language
Levinson, S. C., & Torreira, F. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731 · Cited by 686 · see citing works
“…serial, and proceeds through conceptualization, lemma retrieval, phonological retrieval, and phonetic encoding, following a time course that seems well understood (Indefrey, 2011), extending 600–1200 ms or more before articulation depending on the ease of retrieval and the length of the turn.”
BackgroundCoupled neural systems underlie the production and comprehension of naturalistic narrative speech
Silbert, L. J., Honey, C. J., Simony, E., Poeppel, D., & Hasson, U. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1323812111 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
“In addition, analytical methods differ greatly between this study and previous ones: Here we measure response reliability, whereas the majority of previous studies measure signal amplitude using eventrelated averaging methods (12, 23).”
MethodResultThe Cortical Organization of Syntax
Matchin, W., & Hickok, G. (2020) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhz180 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Towards a New Neurobiology of Language
Poeppel, D., Emmorey, K. D., Hickok, G. S., & Liina Pylkkänen, A. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3244-12.2012 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
“Second, the definition of and restriction to the few brain regions comprising the classical model dramatically underestimates the number and distribution of brain regions now known to play a critical role in language comprehension (Price, 2012) and production (Indefrey, 2011).”
BackgroundSkipper, J. I., Devlin, J. T., & Lametti, D. R. (2016) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2016.10.004 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
“In both label-based (Indefrey, 2011; Indefrey & Levelt, 2000, 2004; see also Munding, Dubarry, & Alario, 2016) and activation likelihood estimation (ALE) neuroimaging meta-analyses (Brown, Ingham, Ingham, Laird, & Fox, 2005; Eickhoff, Heim, Zilles, & Amunts, 2009; Turkeltaub, Eden, Jones, &…”
Listeners use intonational phrase boundaries to project turn ends in spoken interaction
Bögels, S., & Torreira, F. (2015) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2015.04.004 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
“, 2006; Levinson, 2013), since listeners will often need several hundreds of milliseconds to plan the initial words of their turn (Indefrey & Levelt, 2004; Indefrey, 2011). Under this hypothesis, listeners would need to rely on information located earlier in the speaker's turn. We address this issue in the following s…”
InfluentialInteraction between dorsal and ventral processing streams: Where, when and how?
Cloutman, L. L. (2012) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2012.08.003 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
“…& Gagnon, 1997; Levelt, Roelofs, & Meyer, 1999; Schwartz, Dell, Martin, Gahl, & Sobel, 2006), with current neurolinguistic models attempting to map these previously defined linguistic concepts onto cortical networks (e.g., Hickok & Poeppel, 2004, 2007; Indefrey, 2011; Indefrey & Levelt, 2004).”
BackgroundHarvey, D. Y., & Schnur, T. T. (2015) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.004 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
“In a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on word production, Indefrey and Levelt (2004; see also Indefrey, 2011) identified the mid- to posterior middle temporal gyrus (MTG) as important for semantically driven lexical retrieval, suggesting a posterior temporal lobe (including the mid-posterior…”
BackgroundMethodRoelofs, A. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.007 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
The cortical dynamics of speaking: present shortcomings and future avenues
Strijkers, K., & Costa, A. (2016) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1120878 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
“…et al., 2012) and activation maxima slowly progressing from posterior towards anterior brain regions are frequently reported in response to object naming (e.g. Hulten et al., 2009; Indefrey, 2011; I&L, 2004; Liljestrom et al., 2009; Salmelin et al., 1994; Soros et al., 2003; Vihla et al., 2006).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialCorreia, J., Jansma, B. M., Hausfeld, L. G., Kikkert, S., & Bonte, M. L. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00071 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
“…(Marinkovic et al., 2003) corresponding to the www.frontiersin.org February 2015 | Volume 6 | Article 71 | 1 network of brain areas observed in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of speech processing (Binder et al., 2000; Hickok and Poeppel, 2007; Rauschecker and Scott, 2009).”
BackgroundWalenski, M., Europa, E., Caplan, D. N., & Thompson, C. K. (2019) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24523 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
“, the AG and SMG) also is associated with sentence level semantic representations and sentence comprehension (Indefrey, 2011; Indefrey & Levelt, 2004; Schönberger et al., 2014; Vigneau et al., 2006); though note that our analyses revealed no activation peaks in the SMG for sentence comprehension.”
ResultNarrative discourse in anomic aphasia
Andreetta, S., Cantagallo, A., & Marini, A. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.003 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
“Some of the most influental models of linguistic production (e.g., Frederiksen, Bracewell, Breuleux, & Renaud, 1990; Indefrey, 2011) postulate that the process of lexical generation relies on three major stages: (1) a pre-linguistic conceptual phase, where the speaker generates a mental plan of…”
BackgroundMiozzo, M., Friedemann Pulvermüller, A., & Hauk, O. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu137 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
“Keywords: language production, lexical access, MEG”
BackgroundPickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108610728 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
A Thalamocortical Mechanism for the Absence of Overt Motor Behavior in Covertly Aware Patients
Fernández‐Espejo, D., Rossit, S., & Owen, A. M. (2015) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.2614 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
The Frontal Aslant Tract: A Systematic Review for Neurosurgical Applications
Corte, E. L., Eldahaby, D., Greco, E., Aquino, D., Bertolini, G., Levi, V., Ottenhausen, M., Demichelis, G., Romito, L. M., Acerbi, F., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.641586 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Gauvin, H. S., Baene, W. D., Braß, M., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.037 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
“…detection in internal speech to take place through speech perception processes (Hartsuiker & Kolk, 2001; Levelt, 1983, 1989; Indefrey and Levelt, 2004; Indefrey 2011; Hickok 2012), but rather supports a conflict monitoring model of error detection in speech, as proposed by Nozari et al. (2011).”
InfluentialUnaddressed participants’ gaze in multi-person interaction: optimizing recipiency
Holler, J., & Kendrick, K. H. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00098 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
“As Levinson (2013) has argued, short gaps between turns do not provide adequate time to prepare even a simple next turn, which psycholinguistic research has shown requires at least 600 ms (Indefrey and Levelt, 2004; Indefrey, 2011).”
BackgroundIlle, S., Sollmann, N., Hauck, T., Maurer, S., Tanigawa, N., Obermueller, T., Negwer, C., Droese, D., Zimmer, C., Meyer, B., et al. (2015) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2014.9.jns14929 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Differential processing of thematic and categorical conceptual relations in spoken word production.
de Zubicaray, G. I., Hansen, S. J., & McMahon, K. L. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0028717 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
The Potential for a Speech Brain–Computer Interface Using Chronic Electrocorticography
Rabbani, Q., Milsap, G., & Crone, N. E. (2019) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1007/s13311-018-00692-2 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
“1 Stages of speech production according to Indefrey’s [3] model.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLu, J., Zhao, Z., Zhang, J., Wu, B., Zhu, Y., Chang, E. F., Wu, J., Duffau, H., & Berger, M. S. (2021) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awab125 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
“25,26 However, a recent study found stimulating some speech arrest sites in vPrCG also elicited the arrest of ongoing manual movements (negative motor responses).”
Krieg, S. M., Tarapore, P. E., Picht, T., Tanigawa, N., Houde, J. F., Sollmann, N., Meyer, B., Vajkoczy, P., Berger, M. S., Ringel, F. A., et al. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.016 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
“…in these areas was between 0 and 800 ms (Acheson et al., 2011; Hulten et al., 2009; Salmelin et al., 1994; Soros et al., 2003; Vihla et al., 2006) with a median value of 190 ms for mMTG, 320 ms for pSTG, 360 ms for pMTG, 371 ms for mSTG, 280 ms for SMG, and 300 ms for anG (Indefrey, 2011).”
InfluentialPiai, V., Roelofs, A., Jensen, O. B., Schoffelen, J., & Bonnefond, M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088674 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
“However, according to time estimates from meta-analyses [37,38], picture name planning reaches the articulatory buffer no earlier than about 145 ms before articulation onset.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialStrijkers, K., & Costa, A. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00356 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
“However, this is not the case, since Indefrey (2011) does rely on studies which solely manipulate one and arguably more ambiguous variables (e.g., SI in Aristei et al., 2011; name agreement in Cheng et al., 2010; etc.) as independent sources of evidence concerning time course. www.frontiersin.org…”
BackgroundFunctional Language Shift to the Right Hemisphere in Patients with Language-Eloquent Brain Tumors
Krieg, S. M., Sollmann, N., Hauck, T., Ille, S., Förschler, A., Meyer, B., & Ringel, F. A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075403 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
“This differentiation is useful for separating the motor part of language from conceptual, phonological, and semantic processing of language [39].”
BackgroundInfluentialPiai, V., Roelofs, A., Acheson, D. J., & Takashima, A. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00832 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
“…the neural substrates associated with the processes of regulating and monitoring language production have remained relatively underspecified (cf. Indefrey, 2011; for recent advances, see Nozari et al., 2011; Riès et al., 2011), in part because the manipulations and comparisons within these…”
BackgroundInfluentialFunctional MRI evidence for the decline of word retrieval and generation during normal aging
Baciu, M. V., Boudiaf, N., Cousin, É., Perrone‐Bertolotti, M., Pichat, C., Fournet, N., Chainay, H., Lamalle, L., & Krainik, A. (2015) · AGE · doi:10.1007/s11357-015-9857-y · Cited by 107 · see citing works
“…the psycholinguistic models of lexical production (Caramazza 1997; Dell and O’Seaghdha 1992; Levelt 1992) consider three main stages of word retrieval and generation, i.e., conceptual (lexical), meaning (lexical retrieval, semantic), and phonological–phonetic (for details, see Indefrey 2011).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialNeurolinguistics Research Advancing Development of a Direct-Speech Brain-Computer Interface
Cooney, C., Folli, R., & Coyle, D. (2018) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2018.09.016 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
“EEG studies have been used to study the time courses associated with the processing stages in word production (see Indefrey, 2011 for review).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOn the cortical dynamics of word production: a review of the MEG evidence
Munding, D., Dubarry, A., & Alario, F. ‐. (2015) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1071857 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
“Dynamics of function – interpretation according to Indefrey’s attribution of functional anatomy Table S1 lists all areas mentioned as being responsible for a function in Indefrey and Levelt’s model of speech production (Indefrey, 2011; Indefrey & Levelt, 2004).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA speech planning network for interactive language use
Castellucci, G. A., Kovach, C. K., Howard, M. A., Greenlee, J. D. W., & Long, M. A. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04270-z · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Beta oscillations reflect memory and motor aspects of spoken word production
Piai, V., Roelofs, A., Rommers, J., & Maris, E. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22806 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
“However, the beta-power decrease in the naming task was more broadly distributed over the left temporal cortex, extending more anteriorly to temporal areas strongly associated with conceptualizing and lexical retrieval in word production [e.g., Baldo et al., 2013; Indefrey, 2011; Indefrey and Levelt, 2004; Lambon Ralp…”
BackgroundGrandchamp, R., Rapin, L., Perrone-Bertolotti, M., Pichat, C., Haldin, C., Cousin, E., Lachaux, J.-P., Dohen, M., Perrier, P., Garnier, M., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02019 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
“This proposition was based on considerations and models by Indefrey (2011), Guenther and Vladusich (2012), Hickok (2012), and Tian and Poeppel (2013), among others.”
MethodFast response times signal social connection in conversation
Templeton, E. M., Chang, L. J., Reynolds, E. A., Cone LeBeaumont, M. D., & Wheatley, T. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2116915119 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
“The modal conversational response time is extremely short, around 200 ms (18, 19)—three times faster than the average speed with which people can name an object (20, 21) and too rapid to rely on deliberative conscious control (22).”
BackgroundA dorsal-pathway account of aphasic language production: The WEAVER++/ARC model
Roelofs, A. (2014) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.07.001 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
“…localizing the functional processes assumed by the psycholinguistic model (i.e., WEAVER þþ ) to anatomical gray-matter areas of the human brain (Indefrey, 2011a; Indefrey & Levelt, 2004); (3) tracto-graphic evidence concerning the structure and anatomical white-matter connections of the AF…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe roles of the temporal lobe in creative insight: an integrated review
Shen, W., Yuan, Y., Liu, C., & Luo, J. (2017) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2017.1308885 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
“Additionally, given that the aMTG region is sometimes implicated in effortful retrieval attempts (Han, O'Connor, Eslick, & Dobbins, 2012; Lind ın, D ıaz, Capilla, Ortiz, & Maest u, 2010), especially the retrieval and selection of more peripheral thematic relations (Indefrey, 2011; Taylor, Rastle, & Davis, 2013) and se…”
BackgroundNozari, N., & Pinet, S. (2019) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2019.100875 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
“This assumed timeline is often borrowed from Indefrey and Levelt (2004) or its upgraded form (Indefrey, 2011).”
BackgroundIlle, S., Sollmann, N., Hauck, T., Maurer, S., Tanigawa, N., Obermueller, T., Negwer, C., Droese, D., Boeckh‐Behrens, T., Meyer, B., et al. (2015) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2014.10.jns141582 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Angrick, M., Luo, S., Rabbani, Q., Candrea, D. N., Shah, S., Milsap, G., Anderson, W. S., Gordon, C. R., Rosenblatt, K. R., Clawson, L., et al. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-60277-2 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
“The color bar at the bottom limits the temporal influence to − 400 ms prior to PSO, consistent with previous reports about speech planning 39 and articulatory representations 19 .”
BackgroundResultBilingualism and domain-general cognitive functions from a neural perspective: A systematic review
Tao, L., Wang, G., Zhu, M., & Cai, Q. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.029 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
AbdulSabur, N. Y., Xu, Y., Liu, S., Chow, H. M., Baxter, M., Carson, J., & Braun, A. R. (2014) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.01.017 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
“It is now known that the anatomical foundations of speech comprehension and production and their interrelation are more complex (Hickok & Poeppel, 2007; Indefrey, 2011).”
BackgroundMARINI, A., & Andreetta, S. (2016) · John Benjamins Publishing Company eBooks · doi:10.1075/z.200 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Hofstetter, S., Friedmann, N., & Assaf, Y. (2016) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-016-1273-2 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
“…are thought to involve various areas in the MTG and superior temporal gyrus (STG) (Damasio et al. 2004; Indefrey 2007; Dronkers et al. 2000; Indefrey 2011; Indefrey and Levelt 2004; Philipose et al. 2007; Hickok and Poeppel 2000; Indefrey and Levelt 2000; Poeppel and Hickok 2004), with…”
BackgroundInfluentialWhat did we learn from forty years of research on semantic interference? A Bayesian meta-analysis
Bürki, A., Elbuy, S., Madec, S., & Vasishth, S. (2020) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2020.104125 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Specifying the role of the left prefrontal cortex in word selection
Riès, S., Karzmark, C. R., Navarrete, E., Knight, R. T., & Dronkers, N. (2015) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.07.007 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“…Janssen et al., 2011; Maess et al., 2002; although see Janssen et al., 2014 for activity in a later time-window: 500–750 ms post-stimulus), which is in the time-window typically attributed to lexical selection (Indefrey, 2011; Indefrey & Levelt, 2004; Levelt et al., 1999; Strijkers & Costa, 2011).”
BackgroundWhat Does a Cue Do? Comparing Phonological and Semantic Cues for Picture Naming in Aphasia
Meteyard, L., & Bose, A. (2018) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2017_jslhr-l-17-0214 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
“A large body of psycho-and neuro-linguistic have shown the effect of specific lexical and image properties on word production (e.g., Indefrey, 2011).”
Piai, V., Roelofs, A., & Maris, E. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.014 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
“Lexical access takes place between about 200 ms post picture-onset and about 145 ms before articulation onset (Indefrey, 2011; Indefrey & Levelt, 2004).”
Klaus, J., & Hartwigsen, G. (2019) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24597 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
“, 2013; Zhang, Yu, Zhang, Jin, & Li, 2018), arguing for a role of this region in syllabification (Indefrey, 2011).”
BackgroundResultNewman, A. J., Supalla, T. R., Fernandez, N., Newport, E. L., & Bavelier, D. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1510527112 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
“These included the middle STS—an area associated with lexical (lemma) selection and retrieval in studies of spoken languages (29)—and the posterior STS.”
MethodPerret, C., & Bonin, P. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1100-1 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
“Following the proposals made by Indefrey (2011), they argued that cognitive processes are common up to the point of lexeme encoding.”
Yoo, H., Bowman, D. A., & Oller, D. K. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01510 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
“Obviously, rapid turn taking between speakers requires quick cognitive processing, considering that it takes at least 600ms to prepare a single word production (Indefrey and Levelt, 2004; Indefrey, 2011).”
BackgroundZou, L., Abutalebi, J., Zinszer, B. D., Yan, X., Shu, H., Peng, D., & Ding, G. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.062 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
“In general, the brain areas engaged during picture naming include the left posterior inferior frontal gyrus, the left precentral gyrus, the supplementary motor area, the left middle and posterior parts of the STG and middle temporal gyri, the right middle STG, the left fusiform gyrus, the left anterior insula, the lef…”
BackgroundThe Oxford Handbook of the Mental Lexicon
Anna Papafragou, A., Trueswell, J. C., & Gleitman, L. R. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.001.0001 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Removing speech artifacts from electroencephalographic recordings during overt picture naming
Porcaro, C., Medaglia, M. T., & Krott, A. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.049 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
“This resulted in a map of the involved brain areas and the time course of their activation (see also the update by Indefrey, 2011).”
InfluentialKrieg, S. M., Sollmann, N., Hauck, T., Ille, S., Meyer, B., & Ringel, F. A. (2014) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-15-20 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
“Background The restriction of language function to the classical Broca’s or Wernicke’s area is not compatible anymore [1-3].”
BackgroundStrijkers, K., Costa, A., & Friedemann Pulvermüller, A. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.041 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“The finding that word frequency modulated activity in the left anterior and posterior-superior temporal cortex, and the left IFG with a similar temporal profile already calls for a revision of serial models of language production which assume that early lexical processes are confined to the temporal cortex (Indefrey,…”
InfluentialRose, S. B., Aristei, S., Melinger, A., & Rahman, R. A. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000592 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“Theoretically, competition models of lexical selection assume that early effects resulting from lexical competition should emerge in the time window of around 200-250ms (Indefry & Levelt, 2004; Indefrey, 2011).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialHu, J., Small, H., Kean, H., Takahashi, A., Zekelman, L., Kleinman, D., Ryan, E., Nieto-Castañón, A., Ferreira, V., & Fedorenko, E. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhac350 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Sollmann, N., Tanigawa, N., Ringel, F. A., Zimmer, C., Meyer, B., & Krieg, S. M. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.002 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
“5 s, we applied rTMS pulses 300 ms after the picture presentation onset, according to our current knowledge of the timing of naming-related activity reported in previous studies (Indefrey, 2011; Salmelin et al., 2000; Wheat et al., 2013).”
InfluentialLi, L., Abutalebi, J., Zou, L., Yan, X., Liu, L., Feng, X., Wang, R., Guo, T., & Ding, G. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.007 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“…language processing, including the inferior frontal gyrus (Broca's area) and superior temporal cortex (Wernicke's area) (Hickok and Poeppel, 2007; Indefrey, 2011; Price, 2010), and those for language control such as the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC 1 )…”
Riès, S., Dhillon, R. K., Clarke, A., King‐Stephens, D., Laxer, K. D., Weber, P. B., Kuperman, R. A., Auguste, K. I., Brunner, P., Schalk, G., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1620669114 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Sierpowska, J., Gabarrós, A., Coello, A. F., Camins, À., Castañer, S., Juncadella, M., de Diego‐Balaguer, R., & Rodríguez‐Fornells, A. (2015) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.01.005 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
“…speech monitoring (Alario, Chainay, Lehericy, & Cohen, 2006; Chauvel, Rey, Buser, & Bancaud, 1996; Crosson et al., 2001; Fried et al., 1991; Gabarrós et al., 2011; Indefrey, 2011; Indefrey & Levelt, 2004; Krainik et al., 2003; Laplane, Talairach, Meininger, Bancaud, & Orgogozo, 1977; Pai, 1999).”
Structural white matter connectometry of word production in aphasia: an observational study
Hula, W. D., Panesar, S. S., Gravier, M., Yeh, F.-C. F., Dresang, H. C., Dickey, M. W., & Fernandez-Miranda, J. C. (2020) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awaa193 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“The positive associations between the phonological processing parameter p and both left AF and MdLF are also consistent with findings from meta-analyses of functional activation studies of word production (Indefrey and Levelt, 2004; Indefrey, 2011).”
ResultZhu, X., Damian, M. F., & Zhang, Q. (2015) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.007 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“Seven participants were excluded from the EEG analysis because of large electrode drift and excessive artifacts.”
InfluentialPiai, V., Roelofs, A., & van der Meij, R. (2012) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.050 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“However, there is also a reason to assume that a certain amount of rescaling 23 should be used (see also Indefrey, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHigh frequency gamma activity in the left hippocampus predicts visual object naming performance
Hamamé, C. M., Alario, F. ‐., Llorens, A., Liégeois‐Chauvel, C., & Trébuchon, A. (2014) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2014.05.007 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Electrophysiological evidence that inhibition supports lexical selection in picture naming
Shao, Z., Roelofs, A., Acheson, D. J., & Meyer, A. S. (2014) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2014.07.009 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“In a meta-analysis of word production studies, Indefrey and Levelt (2004) and Indefrey (2011), see also Costa et al. (2009), estimated that lexical selection takes place between about 200 to 275 ms after picture onset and phonological code retrieval between 275 and 355 ms. Based on these estimates,…”
Backgroundde Zubicaray, G. I., McMahon, K. L., & Howard, D. (2013) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/01690965.2013.848990 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
“Accordingly, psycholinguistic research has availed itself of electrophysiological and neuroimaging data in order to develop theory relevant to combined cognitive and brain operations, beginning with the meta-analysis of Indefrey and Levelt (2004; also Indefrey, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodDubarry, A., Llorens, A., Trébuchon, A., Carron, R., Liégeois‐Chauvel, C., Bénar, C., & Alario, F. ‐. (2017) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797616681296 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“2) and our cognitive interpretation of the data (Table 1) are in agreement with many previous findings (Edwards et al., 2010; Indefrey, 2011; Leuthardt et al., 2012; Llorens et al., 2011; see also Munding et al., 2015; Price, 2012).”
BackgroundResultRoelofs, A. (2014) · Japanese Psychological Research · doi:10.1111/jpr.12050 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
What do pauses in narrative production reveal about the nature of word retrieval deficits in PPA?
Mack, J. E., Chandler, S. D., Meltzer‐Asscher, A., Rogalski, E. J., Weıntraub, S., Mesulam, M. M., & Thompson, C. K. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.019 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“We hypothesized that pause distribution by word class would predict atrophy in regions supporting lemma retrieval, such as the MTG (Indefrey, 2011; Indefrey and Levelt, 2004; Schwartz et al., 2009; de Zubicaray et al., 2002) and/or the IFG, which has been claimed to exert top-down control over…”
InfluentialResponse-Locked Brain Dynamics of Word Production
Riès, S., Janssen, N., Burle, B., & Alario, F. ‐. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058197 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
“We note that activity in medial frontal regions is not included in the model proposed by [5] contrarily to that proposed by [3].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialWestwood, S. J., & Romani, C. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.031 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Ishkhanyan, B., Lange, V. M., Boye, K., Mogensen, J., Karabanov, A. N., Hartwigsen, G., & Siebner, H. R. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00685 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“…duration), it is possible that the facilitation occurred already at the initiation phase when the phonological planning of the grammatical item retrieval occurred, as articulation takes place at an even later point after stimulus onset and involves more posterior cortical regions (Indefrey, 2011).”
BackgroundMissing links: The functional unification of language and memory (L∪M)
Roger, É., Banjac, S., de Schotten, M. T., & Baciu, M. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.12.012 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
The dual stream model of speech and language processing
Hickok, G. S. (2022) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-823384-9.00003-7 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Please Get to the Point! A Cortical Correlate of Linguistic Informativeness
Marini, A., & Urgesi, C. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00283 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
“ing on language processing unveiled the existence of an articulated cognitive architecture implemented in an extensive array of neural networks (Indefrey, 2011; Indefrey & Levelt, 2004).”
BackgroundHigh-Density EEG in Current Clinical Practice and Opportunities for the Future
Stoyell, S. M., Wilmskoetter, J., Dobrota, M.-A., Chinappen, D. M., Bonilha, L., Mintz, M., Brinkmann, B. H., Herman, S. T., Peters, J. M., Vulliémoz, S., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1097/wnp.0000000000000807 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Gastaldon, S., Arcara, G., Navarrete, E., & Peressotti, F. (2020) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2020.09.026 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
From blueprints to brain maps: the status of the Lemma Model in cognitive neuroscience
Kemmerer, D. L. (2018) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2018.1537498 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“This is because, as discussed earlier and as pointed out by both Papoutsi et al. (2009) and Indefrey (2011), the left frontal lobe not only implements phonetic encoding and articulation, but also subserves the more abstract process of syllabification.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialKrieg, S. M., Sollmann, N., Tanigawa, N., Förschler, A., Meyer, B., & Ringel, F. A. (2015) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-015-1042-7 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Dynamic reconfiguration of the language network preceding onset of speech in picture naming
Liljeström, M., Kujala, J., Stevenson, C. M., & Salmelin, R. H. (2014) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22697 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“In terms of models proposed for speech production [Indefrey, 2011; Indefrey and Levelt, 2004], differences between the two tasks in the early time window would be associated primarily with perceptual or lexical processing, while processes related to motor planning of speech should be captured within the late time wind…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialValente, A., Bürki, A., & Laganaro, M. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00390 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“As is evident from previous reviews (Indefrey and Levelt, 2004; Indefrey, 2011) this issue is particularly complex and our current knowledge, which relies on the comparison of disparate sources of evidence, is still incomplete.”
Semantic processing during language production: an update of the swinging lexical network
Rahman, R. A., & Melinger, A. (2019) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2019.1599970 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Nguyen, V., Versyp, O., Cox, C. M. M., & Fusaroli, R. (2022) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13754 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Roelofs, A., & Ferreira, V. S. (2019) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/10841.003.0006 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
A Bimodal Deep Learning Architecture for EEG-fNIRS Decoding of Overt and Imagined Speech
Cooney, C., Folli, R., & Coyle, D. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2021.3132861 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Decoding levels of representation in reading: A representational similarity approach
Fischer‐Baum, S., Bruggemann, D., Gallego, I. F., Li, D. S. P., & Tamez, E. R. (2017) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.02.017 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
The Role of Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Language Processing
Klaus, J., & Schutter, D. J. L. G. (2018) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.03.002 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Kendrick, K. H. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00250 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
“Given that experimental research has shown that speakers need at least 600 ms to plan even a simple word (Indefrey and Levelt, 2004; Indefrey, 2011), processes of language production in conversation must begin well before the current turn ends (Levinson, 2013).”
BackgroundFama, M. E., Hayward, W., Snider, S. F., Friedman, R. B., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2016) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2016.09.009 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
“In the model, self monitoring occurs via an inner loop that utilizes speech perception areas in the superior temporal gyrus (Indefrey, 2011), but the precise mechanism of monitoring is not critical for the current study (for further discussion of self-monitoring in IS, see Discussion Section 4.4).”
InfluentialBürki, A., Cheneval, P. P., & Laganaro, M. (2015) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.08.006 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Effects of navigated TMS on object and action naming
Hernandez-Pavon, J. C., Mäkelä, N., Lehtinen, H., Lioumis, P., & Mäkelä, J. P. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00660 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“Nevertheless, the early onset of the nTMS may also influence conceptual preparation, lexical concept selection, and lemma retrieval attributed to the early stages of picture naming processes (Indefrey and Levelt, 2004; Indefrey, 2011).”
BackgroundGrey and white matter substrates of action naming
Akinina, Y. S., Dragoy, O., Ivanova, M. V., Вячеславовна, И. Е., Андреевна, С. О., Petryshevskii, A. G., Николаевна, Ф. О., Turken, A. U., Shklovsky, V. M., & Dronkers, N. F. (2019) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.015 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“Unfortunately, incomplete coverage did not allow us to test existing neuroanatomical picture naming (Indefrey and Levelt, 2004; Indefrey, 2011; Roelofs, 2014) and semantic processing (Binder and Desai, 2011; Gainotti, 2011; Lambon Ralph et al., 2017; Pulvermüller, 2013) accounts that attribute…”
BackgroundInfluentialde Zubicaray, G., Johnson, K., Howard, D., & Mcmahon, K. (2014) · Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.01.018 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Win, K., Pluta, J. B., Yushkevich, P. A., Irwin, D. J., McMillan, C. T., Rascovsky, K., Wolk, D. A., & Grossman, M. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00330 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
- Authors
- Indefrey, P.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Indefrey, Peter
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 255-255
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3191502
- OpenAlex
- W2056949810
- Semantic Scholar
- 1d28a8977f5bd27b32e22401d7ebb700d3eb494b
- Cited by
- 767
- References
- 126
- Citations by year
- 2026: 56 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 13.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- word production, neural correlates, picture naming, left inferior frontal gyrus, inferior parietal cortex, brain structure-function relationship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review