Cited by 247Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 118 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of depression and burden among informal care-givers of people with dementia: a meta-analysis

Open access
Collins, Rebecca N., Kishita, Naoko·2020·Ageing and Society

Abstract

This meta-analysis examined the prevalence of depression and burden among informal care-givers of people with dementia (PwD) and compared the prevalence of depression between male and female, and spousal and non-spousal, care-givers. The quality of studies was evaluated and moderator variables explored. A search of six electronic databases (PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO, MEDLINE Complete, SCOPUS, Web of Science and ProQuest) was conducted from the first available date to the 31 October 2017. Inclusion criteria involved observational studies on the prevalence of burden or depression among informal care-givers of PwD. Forty-three studies were examined with a total of 16,911 participants. The adjusted pooled prevalence of depression was 31.24 per cent (95% confidence interval (CI) = 27.70, 35.01) and burden was 49.26 per cent (95% CI = 37.15, 61.46), although heterogeneity among prevalence estimates was high. Depression prevalence estimates differed according to the instrument used and the continent where the study was conducted. The odds of having depression were almost one and a half times higher in female compared to male care-givers. No significant difference was observed between spouses and non-spouses. Most studies had a medium risk of bias. Results suggest a great need within this population for interventions that are effective at reducing burden and depressive symptoms. It therefore appears imperative for dementia services that are not providing such interventions to do so.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0144686x19000527

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 118 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 1978, The ICD-9 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines
  2. Ramos-Brieva, 1986, Validacion de la versión castellana de la escala de Hamilton para la depresión, Actas Luso-Españolas de Neurología, Psiquiatría y Ciencias Afines, 6, 324
  3. 1987, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  4. Munn, 2014, The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual 2014: The Systematic Review of Prevalence and Incidence Data
  5. Martín, 1996, Adaptación para nuestro medio de la Escala de Sobrecarga del Cuidador (Caregiver Burden Interview) de Zarit, Revista de Gerontología, 6, 338
  6. 1992, The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines
  7. 1994, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  8. Borenstein, 2005, Comprehensive Meta-analysis (Version 2)
  9. 1980, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  10. Dilworth-Anderson, 1994, Stress Effects on Family Caregivers of Alzheimer's Patients, 385
  11. 2000, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  12. 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  13. 2017, Depression and Other Common Mental Disorders: Global Health Estimates
  14. Simpson, CE (2010) Sleep: Effect on Dementia Caregiver Mastery, Perceived Stress and Depression (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
  15. Conde, 1975, Adaptación castellana de la escala de evaluación conductual para la depresión de Beck, Revista de Psiquiatría y Psicología Médica de Europa y América Latinas, 12, 217

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 247

Metadata

Authors
Collins, R. N., & Kishita, N.
Affiliations
University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Collins, Rebecca N.
Venue
Ageing and Society
Published
2019-06-06
Volume
40
Issue
11
Pages
2355-2392
ISSN
  • 0144-686X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1779
OpenAlex
W2938077275
Cited by
244
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 9
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ageing and Society (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • American Psychiatric Publishing
  • American Association of Nurse Practitioners
  • American Psychiatric Nurses Association
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
depression, caregiver burden, informal caregivers, dementia, prevalence, spousal caregivers, gender differences, caregiver interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review