Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 404

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On Explicit and Negative Data Effecting and Affecting Competence and Linguistic Behavior

Schwartz, Bonnie D.·1993·Studies in Second Language Acquisition
DOI 10.1017/s0272263100011931
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Psychologically speaking, all linguistic behavior is the overt manifestation of some type of underlying knowledge that is represented in the mind/brain of an individual. Exposure to linguistic data is necessary for growth of the system of knowledge. On the basis of only overt linguistic behavior, how can we ascertain whether the native and nonnative knowledge systems that people have are of distinct or similar types? Is there a (necessary) relationship between type of knowledge and type of linguistic exposure? The hypothesis to be defended is that negative data and explicit data result in a type of knowledge that is not to be equated with linguistic competence. The claim is not that negative and explicit data cannot give rise to knowledge; rather, the specific claim is that only positive data can effect the construction of an interlanguage grammar that is comparable to the knowledge system that characterizes the result of first language acquisition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0272263100011931

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Schwartz, 1988, A reply to Gregg: In defence of theory building, Second Language Research, 4, 157
  2. 10.1007/978-94-017-1980-3_17 · DOI
  3. Chomsky, 1975, Reflections on language
  4. White, 1992, On triggering data in L2 acquisition: A reply to Schwartz and Gubala-Ryzak, Second Language Research, 8, 120
  5. White, 1991, Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom, Second Language Research, 7, 133
  6. duPlessis, 1987, UG or not UG, that is the question: A reply to Clahsen and Muysken, Second Language Research, 3, 56
  7. 10.1093/applin/8.2.95 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Weissenborn, 1992, Theoretical issues in language acquisition: Continuity and change in development
  9. 10.1086/288832 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Finer, 1986, Second language acquisition of reflexive-binding, Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society (NELS), 16, 154
  11. Schwartz, 1990, Issues in Germanic syntax, 251, 10.1515/9783110847277.251 · doi:10.1515/9783110847277.251
  12. Schwartz, 1992, Learnability and grammar re-organization in L2A: Against negative evidence causing the unlearning of verb movement, Second Language Research, 8, 1
  13. 10.1075/lald.3.13sch · doi:10.1075/lald.3.13sch
  14. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1976.tb00259.x · DOI
  15. 10.1515/prbs.1991.3.2.101 · DOI
  16. Tomaselli, 1990, Analysing the acquisition stages of negation in L2 German: Support for UG in adult SLA, Second Language Research, 6, 1
  17. 10.1017/S0140525X00071491 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Clahsen, 1986, The availability of Universal Grammar to adult and child learners–A study of the acquisition of German word order, Second Language Research, 2, 93
  19. 10.1075/lald.3.12mei · doi:10.1075/lald.3.12mei
  20. 10.1017/S0272263100004137 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1017/S0008413100021988 · DOI
  22. Klein, 1990, Variability in second language acquisition, 417
  23. 10.1007/978-94-009-2733-9_15 · DOI
  24. Schwartz B. D. (1992, October). An alternative account of apparent inaccessibility to UG in L2A. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston.
  25. 10.1007/978-94-009-3727-7_6 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Vainikka, Language acquisition studies in generative grammar: Papers in honor of Ken Wexler from the GLOW 1991 Workshops
  27. Chomsky, 1981, Lectures on government and binding
  28. Schwartz B. D. (1987). The modular basis of second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
  29. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1986.tb00559.x · DOI
  30. Berwick, 1985, The acquisition of syntactic knowledge, 10.7551/mitpress/1074.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Bley-Vroman, 1988, The accessibility of Universal Grammar in adult language learning, Second Language Research, 4, 1
  32. Baker, 1979, Syntactic theory and the projection problem, Linguistic Inquiry, 10, 533
  33. Belletti, 1990, Generalized verb movement: Aspects of verb syntax
  34. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1985.tb01014.x · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1075/lald.3.14hil · DOI
  36. Chomsky, 1986, Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use
  37. 10.1007/978-94-009-4638-5 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Pollock, 1989, Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP, Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 365
  39. Chomsky, 1986, Barriers
  40. Schwartz, 1986, The epistemological status of second language acquisition, Second Language Research, 2, 120
  41. Krashen, 1981, Second language acquisition and second language learning
  42. Pierce A. (1989). On the emergence of syntax: A cross-linguistic study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
  43. Schwartz, Language acquisition studies in generative grammar: Papers in honor of Ken Wexler from the GLOW 1991 Workshops
  44. Manzini, 1987, Parameters, binding theory, and learnability, Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 413
  45. Radford, 1990, Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax
  46. 10.1017/CBO9781139524544.007 · DOI
  47. Chomsky, 1980, Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky, 35
  48. 10.1007/978-94-009-3727-7 · DOI
  49. Emonds, 1978, The verbal complex V'-V in French, Linguistic Inquiry, 9, 151
  50. 10.1017/S0008413100019915 · DOI
  51. Hilles, 1986, Interlanguage and the pro-drop parameter, Second Language Research, 2, 33
  52. 10.1007/978-94-009-2733-9_10 · DOI
  53. Bley-Vroman, 1990, The logical problem of foreign language learning, Linguistic Analysis, 20, 3
  54. Clahsen, 1989, The UG paradox in L2 acquisition, Second Language Research, 5, 1
  55. 10.1207/s15327817la0104_3 · DOI · Paper page
  56. MacLaughlin D. (1992, October). Language acquisition and the subset principle. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston.
  57. Hornstein, 1981, Explanation in linguistics, 9

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Schwartz, B. D.
Venue
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
1993-06
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
147-163
ISSN
  • 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1545
DOI
10.1017/s0272263100011931
OpenAlex
W2152484973
Cited by
404
References
2
FWCI
70.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 5638 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.