The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EXPLICITNESS, INTAKE, AND THE ISSUE OF AWARENESS: Another Piece to the Puzzle
Abstract
The conditions (implicit or explicit) under which exposure to L2 input takes place and the level of awareness raised while processing input may be strongly related to the learning process. This study investigates how intake was affected both by awareness and by the conditions under which a problem-solving task was performed. Spanish conditional sentences were presented to learners through five different degrees of explicitness, which were the result of combining the factors [±formal instruction] and [±directions to search for rules]. Intake was measured through a multiple-choice recognition test administered immediately after the experimental task. Level of awareness was assessed by means of think-aloud protocols collected during input processing. Results indicate that (a) the degrees of explicitness had a differential effect on intake, (b) the higher the level of awareness demonstrated, the stronger the effect on intake, and (c) the conditions under which the task was administered influenced the way information was processed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 5,435 · cited 7×
“…VanPatten, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996) and that, from a cognitive perspective, attention to the input determines internalization of language (e.g., Hulstijn, 1989; Long, 1991; Schmidt, 1990, 1993, 1994a, 1994b, 1995; Sharwood Smith, 1981; Slobin, 1985; Tomlin & Villa, 1994; VanPatten, 1990, 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialAwareness and Second Language Acquisition
Schmidt, R. (1992) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190500002476 · Cited by 825
Doughty, C. (1991) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100010287 · Cited by 619
Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning.
Curran, T., & Keele, S. W. (1993) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.1.189 · Cited by 594 · cited 6×
“…agreement in that (a) focal attention is a necessary component of learning (e.g., Carr & Curran, 1994; Ericsson & Simon, 1984; Kihlstorm, 1984; Schmidt, 1994a, 1994b, 1995) and (b) awareness allows for a more elaborate type of structural learning (e.g., Carr & Curran, 1994; Curran & Keele, 1993).”
BackgroundInfluentialCommunicating about Grammar: A Task-Based Approach
Fotos, S., & Ellis, R. (1991) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587079 · Cited by 408
On the relationship between implicit and explicit modes in the learning of a complex rule structure.
Reber, A. S., Kassin, S. M., Lewis, S., & Cantor, G. (1980) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.5.492 · Cited by 367
Rules and instances in foreign language learning: Interactions of explicit and implicit knowledge
Ellis, N. (1993) · European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541449308520120 · Cited by 269 · cited 4×
“…under the premise of an interface between implicit and explicit forms of knowledge (e.g., Alanen, 1995; De Graaff, 1997; DeKeyser, 1994, 1995; Ellis, 1993; Harley, 1994; Hulstijn, 1989; Hulstijn & De Graaff, 1994; Robinson, 1995a, 1996a, 1996b, 1997a, 1997b; Schmidt, 1994a; VanPatten, 1994).”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Introduction: Investigating Form‐Focused Instruction
Ellis, R. (2001) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00013.x · Cited by 826
Feedback, Noticing and Instructed Second Language Learning
Mackey, A. (2006) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/ami051 · Cited by 536
Attention and Memory during SLA
Robinson, P. (2003) · The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1002/9780470756492.ch19 · Cited by 402
The effect of interactivity with a music video game on second language vocabulary recall
deHaan, J., Reed, W. M., & Kuwanda, K. (2010) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44215 · Cited by 266
Implicit and explicit instruction in L2 learning: Norris & Ortega (2000) revisited and updated
Goo, J., Granena, G., Yilmaz, Y., & Novella, M. (2015) · Studies in Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/sibil.48.18goo · Cited by 224
Implicit AND explicit language learning: Their dynamic interface and complexity
Ellis, N. C. (2015) · Studies in Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/sibil.48.01ell · Cited by 201
Eye tracking as a measure of noticing: A study of explicit recasts in SCMC
Smith, B. (2012) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44300 · Cited by 177
Lee, S. (2007) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00400.x · Cited by 131
Shintani, N. (2015) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.166 · Cited by 129
Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition
Erlam, R. (2005) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/1362168805lr161oa · Cited by 123
Winke, P. M. (2013) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263112000903 · Cited by 121
Hernández, T. A. (2011) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168810388694 · Cited by 55
Age and learning environment: Are children implicit second language learners?
LICHTMAN, K. (2016) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000915000598 · Cited by 50
The aptitude-treatment interaction effects on the learning of grammar rules
Hwu, F., & Sun, S. (2012) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2012.10.009 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosa, E., & O'Neill, M. D.
- Venue
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 511-556
- ISSN
- 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1545
- OpenAlex
- W2011716944
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 35.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
