Cited by 92Language Development and DisordersChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentHearing Impairment and Communication

The early language in Victoria study: Predicting vocabulary at age one and two years from gesture and object use

Open access
BAVIN, E. L., PRIOR, M., REILLY, S., BRETHERTON, L., WILLIAMS, J., EADIE, P., BARRETT, Y., UKOUMUNNE, O. C.·2008·Journal of Child Language

Abstract

The Macarthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDI) have been used widely to document early communicative development. The paper reports on a large community sample of 1,447 children recruited from low, middle and high socioeconomic (SES) areas across metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Regression analyses were conducted to determine the extent to which communicative behaviours reported at 0 ; 8 and 1 ; 0 predicted vocabulary development at 1 ; 0 and 2 ; 0. In support of previous findings with smaller, often less representative samples, gesture and object use at 1 ; 0 were better predictors of 2 ; 0 vocabulary than were gesture and object use at 0 ; 8. At 1 ; 0, children from the lower SES groups were reported to understand more words than children from the higher SES groups, but there were no SES differences for words produced at 1 ; 0 or 2 ; 0. The findings add to our understanding of the variability in the development of early communicative behaviours.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0305000908008726

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BAVIN, E. L., PRIOR, M., REILLY, S., BRETHERTON, L., WILLIAMS, J., EADIE, P., BARRETT, Y., & UKOUMUNNE, O. C.
Affiliations
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
BAVIN, E. L.
Venue
Journal of Child Language
Published
2008-06-27
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
687-701
ISSN
  • 0305-0009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7602
OpenAlex
W2072671450
Cited by
92
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Language (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
Keywords
early vocabulary development, gesture use, object use, communication development, MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory, socioeconomic status, word understanding, word production, one-year-old children, two-year-old children, community sample
MeSH terms
Child Language, Gestures, Humans, Infant, Prospective Studies, Speech Production Measurement, Verbal Learning, Vocabulary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review