The DOI matches its Crossref record; 143 of the 143 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nutritional programming of gastrointestinal tract development. Is the pig a good model for man?
Open accessAbstract
The consequences of early-life nutritional programming in man and other mammalian species have been studied chiefly at the metabolic level. Very few studies, if any, have been performed in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) as the target organ, but extensive GIT studies are needed since the GIT plays a key role in nutrient supply and has an impact on functions of the entire organism. The possible deleterious effects of nutritional programming at the metabolic level were discovered following epidemiological studies in human subjects, and confirmed in animal models. Investigating the impact of programming on GIT structure and function would need appropriate animal models due to ethical restrictions in the use of human subjects. The aim of the present review is to discuss the use of pigs as an animal model as a compromise between ethically acceptable animal studies and the requirement of data which can be interpolated to the human situation. In nutritional programming studies, rodents are the most frequently used model for man, but GIT development and digestive function in rodents are considerably different from those in man. In that aspect, the pig GIT is much closer to the human than that of rodents. The swine species is closely comparable with man in many nutritional and digestive aspects, and thus provides ample opportunity to be used in investigations on the consequences of nutritional programming for the GIT. In particular, the ‘sow–piglets’ dyad could be a useful tool to simulate the ‘human mother–infant’ dyad in studies which examine short-, middle- and long-term effects and is suggested as the reference model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trumbo, P., Schlicker, S., Yates, A. A., & Poos, M. (2002) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90346-9 · Cited by 5,993
Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract
(2006) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-088394-3.x5000-4 · Cited by 4,597
Barker, D. J. P., Hales, C. N., Fall, C. H. D., Osmond, C., Phipps, K., & Clark, P. M. S. (1993) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/bf00399095 · Cited by 2,468
Phenotypic Plasticity and the Origins of Diversity
West-Eberhard, M. J. (1989) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001341 · Cited by 2,110
Developmental Origins of the Metabolic Syndrome: Prediction, Plasticity, and Programming
Mcmillen, I. C., & Robinson, J. S. (2005) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00053.2003 · Cited by 1,910
The Developmental Origins of Adult Disease
Barker, D. J. P. (2004) · Journal of the American College of Nutrition · doi:10.1080/07315724.2004.10719428 · Cited by 1,854
BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Intrauterine growth retardation: Implications for the animal sciences1
Wu, G., Bazer, F. W., Wallace, J. M., & Spencer, T. E. (2006) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2006-156 · Cited by 1,174
Fetal programming and adult health
Godfrey, K. M., & Barker, D. J. (2001) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2001145 · Cited by 995
Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract
Ouyang, A. (1988) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1988.03410100162049 · Cited by 950
Programming by Early Nutrition in Man
Lucas, A. (2007) · Novartis Foundation Symposia · doi:10.1002/9780470514047.ch4 · Cited by 908
Cited by
Haenen, D., Zhang, J., Souza da Silva, C., Bosch, G., van der Meer, I. M., van Arkel, J., van den Borne, J. J. G. C., Pérez Gutiérrez, O., Smidt, H., Kemp, B., et al. (2013) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.112.169672 · Cited by 341
Schomberg, D. T., Tellez, A., Meudt, J. J., Brady, D. A., Dillon, K. N., Arowolo, F. K., Wicks, J., Rousselle, S. D., & Shanmuganayagam, D. (2016) · Toxicologic Pathology · doi:10.1177/0192623315618292 · Cited by 97
Droessler, L., Cornelius, V., Markov, A. G., & Amasheh, S. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22168746 · Cited by 18
“On account of the great similarities between the anatomy and physiology of swine and humans, the pig provides an extremely valuable model for studies compared to other animal models [21], as it is in accordance with human nutritional and digestive effects and mechanisms [22].”
ResultChrononutrition: Potential, Challenges, and Application in Managing Obesity
Fuad, S. A., Ginting, R. P., & Lee, M.-W. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26115116 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Guilloteau, P., Zabielski, R., Hammon, H. M., & Metges, C. C.
- Venue
- Nutrition Research Reviews
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2010-05-26
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-22
- ISSN
- 0954-4224 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2700
- OpenAlex
- W2007214172
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 143
- FWCI
- 13.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutritional programming of gastrointestinal tract development. Is the pig a good model for man? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0954422410000077
- The paper
- Guilloteau, P., Zabielski, R., Hammon, H. M., & Metges, C. C. (2010). Nutritional programming of gastrointestinal tract development. Is the pig a good model for man? Nutrition Research Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954422410000077
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.