Cited by 194Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiet, Metabolism, and Disease

Metabolic consequences of obesity and insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome: diagnostic and methodological challenges

Open access
Jeanes, Yvonne M., Reeves, Sue·2017·Nutrition Research Reviews

Abstract

Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) have a considerable risk of metabolic dysfunction. This review aims to present contemporary knowledge on obesity, insulin resistance and PCOS with emphasis on the diagnostic and methodological challenges encountered in research and clinical practice. Variable diagnostic criteria for PCOS and associated phenotypes are frequently published. Targeted searches were conducted to identify all available data concerning the association of obesity and insulin resistance with PCOS up to September 2016. Articles were considered if they were peer reviewed, in English and included women with PCOS. Obesity is more prevalent in women with PCOS, but studies rarely reported accurate assessments of adiposity, nor split the study population by PCOS phenotypes. Many women with PCOS have insulin resistance, though there is considerable variation reported in part due to not distinguishing subgroups known to have an impact on insulin resistance as well as limited methodology to measure insulin resistance. Inflammatory markers are positively correlated with androgen levels, but detailed interactions need to be identified. Weight management is the primary therapy; specific advice to reduce the glycaemic load of the diet and reduce the intake of pro-inflammatory SFA and advanced glycation endproducts have provided promising results. It is important that women with PCOS are educated about their increased risk of metabolic complications in order to make timely and appropriate lifestyle modifications. Furthermore, well-designed robust studies are needed to evaluate the mechanisms behind the improvements observed with dietary interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954422416000287

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeanes, Y. M., & Reeves, S.
Affiliations
University of Roehampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Reeves, Sue
Venue
Nutrition Research Reviews
Published
2017-02-22
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
97-105
ISSN
  • 0954-4224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2700
OpenAlex
W2590654260
Cited by
194
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrition Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, obesity, insulin resistance, metabolic dysfunction, PCOS diagnostic criteria, PCOS phenotypes, adiposity assessment, inflammatory markers, androgens, weight management, dietary intervention, glycemic load, saturated fatty acids, advanced glycation end products, lifestyle modification
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Female, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Metabolic Diseases, Obesity, Patient Education as Topic, Phenotype, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Risk Factors, Hyperandrogenism, Glucose Intolerance, Metabolic Syndrome, Adiposity, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review