Cited by 325Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Family interaction and the development of borderline personality disorder: A transactional model

FRUZZETTI, ALAN E., SHENK, CHAD, HOFFMAN, PERRY D.·2005·Development and Psychopathology

Abstract

Although no prospective epidemiological studies have evaluated the relationship between family interactions and the development of borderline personality disorder (BPD), there is considerable evidence for the central role of family interactions in the development of BPD. This paper describes the role of family interactions or processes, especially those that might be regarded as invalidating or conflictual, negative or critical, and the absence of more validating, positive, supportive, empathic interactions, in the development of BPD. Perhaps more importantly, the proposed model considers how these parental and family behaviors transact with the child's own behaviors and emotional vulnerabilities, resulting in a developmental model of BPD that is neither blaming of the family member with BPD nor of her or his parents and caregivers, and has important and specific implications for both prevention and intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954579405050479

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The transactional model emphasizes the interaction between high emotional reactivity and negative interpretations of the person, which provoke inadequate emotional responses, and problematic invalidation by the environment.

    “En esta línea, el modelo transaccional (Fruzzetti et al., 2005) enfatiza la interacción entre, por una parte, la alta reactividad emocional y las interpretaciones negativas de la persona, que suelen provocar respuestas emocionales inadecuadas de la persona hacia el entorno y, por otro lado, la invalidación problemática que hace el entorno de las emociones de la persona con TPL.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FRUZZETTI, A. E., SHENK, C., & HOFFMAN, P. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Nevada, Reno (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Published
2005-12
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
1007-1030
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
OpenAlex
W2112237755
Cited by
325
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, family interaction, transactional model, parental criticism, emotional validation, caregiver-child interaction, emotional vulnerability, developmental model, prevention, intervention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Child, Conflict, Psychological, Empathy, Family Relations, Humans, Internal-External Control, Object Attachment, Risk Factors, Self Concept, Social Support, Transactional Analysis, Parenting, Expressed Emotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review