Cited by 110Child Welfare and AdoptionChild Abuse and TraumaAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 91 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 53 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Preventive interventions and sustained attachment security in maltreated children

Open access

Abstract

Thirteen-month-old maltreated infants (n= 137) and their mothers were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: child–parent psychotherapy (CPP), psychoeducational parenting intervention (PPI), or community standard (CS). A fourth group of nonmaltreated infants (n= 52) and their mothers served as a nonmaltreated comparison (NC) group. A prior investigation found that the CPP and the PPI groups demonstrated substantial increases in secure attachment at postintervention, whereas this change was not found in the CS and the NC groups. The current investigation involved the analysis of data obtained at a follow-up assessment that occurred 12 months after the completion of treatment. At follow-up, children in the CPP group had higher rates of secure and lower rates of disorganized attachment than did children in the PPI or the CS group. Rates of disorganized attachment did not differ between the CPP and the NC groups. Intention to treat analyses also showed higher rates of secure attachment at follow-up in the CPP group relative to the PPI and the CS groups. However, groups did not differ on disorganized attachment. Both primary and intention to treat analyses demonstrated that maternal-reported child behavior problems did not differ among the four groups at the follow-up assessment. This is the first investigation to demonstrate sustained attachment security in maltreated children 12 months after the completion of an attachment theory informed intervention. The findings also suggest that, although effective in the short term, parenting interventions alone may not be effective in maintaining secure attachment in children over time.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954579413000278

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

7 tests recomputed · 0 with the reported and recomputed p on opposite sides of .05

Verification

Claims the paper makes

33 Not checked yet · 27 Own result · 24 Own interpretation · 23 Own method · 3 No basis given

Verify all 53 references — free account

Show all 76 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 23
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 16
34 of 34
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The community standard condition did not include an attachment-focused intervention equivalent to CPP or PPI.

    “Families in the CS condition received case management from the DHS, according to their customary approach. Additionally, they received assistance in obtaining referrals to services and resources that may have been more difficult to access outside of the research trial. Service receipt within the CS condition varied from minimal contact to group parent skills training or individual counseling.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Treatment decliners assigned to CPP or PPI who were included in the no-active-treatment comparison group did not receive an active attachment-based intervention.

    “Because of the lack of differences, the primary data analytic comparisons involved families that engaged in CPP and PPI and a group that did not receive active treatment which included those randomly assigned to the CS group and those declining CPP or PPI.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The nonmaltreated comparison children, despite lacking documented maltreatment, were very likely to have experienced adversity because their families received public assistance.

    “a sample of demographically similar nonmaltreated children and their mothers was included to compare treatment outcomes to the functioning of children in families without documented child abuse or neglect but who still received public assistance and thus were very likely to have experienced adversity.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics that don’t add up

Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.

2 of 2

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Doesn’t add upχ²(1) = 9.41reported p < .001 · recomputed p = .002

    “χ2 (1, N = 189) = 9.41, p < .001”

  • Doesn’t add upF(9, 145) = 1.15reported p = .32 · recomputed p = .332

    “F (9, 145) = 1.15, p = .32”

  • Consistentt(187) = 3.43reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t (187) = 3.43, p < .001”

  • Consistentχ²(1) = 7.87reported p = .005 · recomputed p = .005

    “χ2 (1, N = 189) = 7.87, p = .005”

  • ConsistentF(3, 188) = 38.82reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F (3, 188) = 38.82, p < .001”

  • Consistentχ²(3) = 10.37reported p = .02 · recomputed p = .016

    “χ2 (3, N = 189) = 10.37, p = .02”

  • ConsistentF(9, 145) = 0.86reported p = .56 · recomputed p = .563

    “F (9, 145) = 0.86, p = .56”

7 of 7

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Cicchetti, 1995, Developmental psychopathology: Vol. 2. Risk, disorder, and adaptation, 32
  2. Sroufe, 1983, Development and policy concerning children with special needs: Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, 16, 41
  3. Fraiberg, 1981, Treatment and outcome in an infant psychiatry program: I, Journal of Preventive Psychiatry, 1, 89
  4. Lieberman, 2005, Don't hit my mommy: A manual for child parent psychotherapy with young witnesses of family violence
  5. Weinfield, 1999, Handbook of attachment: Therapy, research, and clinical implications, 68
  6. Barnett, 1993, Child abuse, child development, and social policy, 7
  7. Robins, 2000, Diagnostic Interview Schedule for the DSM-IV (DIS-IV)
  8. Rogosch, 1995, Handbook of parenting, 4, 127
  9. Achenbach, 1992, Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/2–3 and 1992 profile
  10. Main, 1990, Attachment in the preschool years: Theory, research, and intervention, 161

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 110

Metadata

Authors
Stronach, E. P., Toth, S. L., Rogosch, F., & Cicchetti, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
  • Stronach, Erin Pickreign
  • Toth, Sheree L.
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Published
2013-11
Volume
25
Issue
4pt1
Pages
919-930
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
OpenAlex
W2149077317
Cited by
109
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
28.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH54643, R01MH054643)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
child abuse, attachment security, disorganized attachment, child-parent psychotherapy, preventive interventions, parenting support, sustained treatment effects, child behavior problems, infants, mothers
MeSH terms
Child Abuse, Family Therapy, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Mother-Child Relations, Object Attachment, Parenting, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review