Cited by 274Stress Responses and CortisolAttachment and Relationship DynamicsNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Does Hugging Provide Stress-Buffering Social Support? A Study of Susceptibility to Upper Respiratory Infection and Illness

Open access
Cohen, Sheldon, Janicki-Deverts, Denise, Turner, Ronald B., Doyle, William J.·2015·Psychological Science

Abstract

Perceived social support has been hypothesized to protect against the pathogenic effects of stress. How such protection might be conferred, however, is not well understood. Using a sample of 404 healthy adults, we examined the roles of perceived social support and received hugs in buffering against interpersonal stress-induced susceptibility to infectious disease. Perceived support was assessed by questionnaire, and daily interpersonal conflict and receipt of hugs were assessed by telephone interviews on 14 consecutive evenings. Subsequently, participants were exposed to a virus that causes a common cold and were monitored in quarantine to assess infection and illness signs. Perceived support protected against the rise in infection risk associated with increasing frequency of conflict. A similar stress-buffering effect emerged for hugging, which explained 32% of the attenuating effect of support. Among infected participants, greater perceived support and more-frequent hugs each predicted less-severe illness signs. These data suggest that hugging may effectively convey social support.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797614559284

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Bolger N DeLongis A Kessler RC Schilling EA Effects of daily stress on negative mood Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989 57 808 818 2810026
  2. Bolger N Amarel D Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007 92 458 475 17352603
  3. Carson JL Collier AM Hu SS Acquired ciliary defects in nasal epithelium of children with acute viral upper respiratory infections Journal of the American Medical Association 1985 312 463 468 3969108
  4. Cobb S Presidential Address-1976. Social support as a moderator of life stress Psychosomatic Medicine 1976 38 300 314 981490
  5. Cohen S Doyle WJ Skoner DP Rabin BS Gwaltney JM Jr Social ties and susceptibility to the common cold Journal of the American Medical Association 1997 277 1940 1944 9200634
  6. Cohen S Frank E Doyle WJ Skoner DP Rabin BS Gwaltney JM Jr Types of stressors that increase susceptibility to the common cold in healthy adults Health Psychology 1998 17 214 223 9619470
  7. Ditzen B Hoppmann C Klumb P Positive couple interactions and daily cortisol: On the stress-protecting role of intimacy Psychosomatic Medicine 2008 70 883 889 18842747
  8. Doyle WJ McBride TP Swarts JD Hayden FG Gwaltney JM The response of the nasal airway, middle ear and Eustachian tube to provocative rhinovirus challenge American Journal of Rhinology 1988 2 149 154 3282216
  9. Falk A Hanson BS Isacsson SO Ostergren PO Job strain and mortality in elderly men: Social network, support, and influence as buffers American Journal of Public Health 1992 82 1136 1139 1636836 PMC1695761
  10. Gottlieb BH Duck SW Support interventions: A typology and agenda for research Handbook of personal relationships 1988 New York, NY John Wiley & Sons 519 541
  11. House JS Work stress and social support reading (Addison-Wesley Series on Occupational Stress) 1981 Boston, MA Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers, Inc.
  12. Kawachi I Berkman LF Social ties and mental health Journal of Urban Health 2001 78 458 467 11564849 PMC3455910
  13. Kiecolt-Glaser JK Newton TL Marriage and health: His and hers Psychological Bulletin 2001 127 472 503 11439708
  14. Lewis MA Rook KS Social control in personal relationships: Impact on health behaviors and psychological distress Health Psychology 1999 18 63 9925047
  15. Master SL Eisenberger NI Taylor SE Naliboff BD Shirinyan D Lieberman MD A picture's worth: Partner photographs reduce experimentally induced pain Psychological Science 2009 20 1316 1318 19788531
  16. Reis HT Patrick BC Higgins ET Kruglanski AW Attachment and intimacy: Component processes Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles 1996 New York, NY Guilford Press 523 563
  17. Rook KS The negative side of social interaction: Impact on psychological well-being Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1984 46 1097 1108 6737206
  18. Rosengren A Orth-Gomer K Wedel H Wilhelmsen L Stressful life events, social support, and mortality in men born in 1933 British Medical Journal 1993 307 1102 1105 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.307.6912.1102 8251807 PMC1679147 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Thoits PA Social support as coping assistance Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1986 54 416 423 3745593
  20. Uchino BN Social support and physical health: Understanding the health consequences of relationships 2004 New Haven, CT Yale University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen, S., Janicki-Deverts, D., Turner, R. B., & Doyle, W. J.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2014-12-19
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
135-147
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2105824485
Cited by
274
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 4
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
  • KiltHub Repository
Funders
  • University of Pittsburgh (UL1RR024153, RR024153)
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000005, UL1 TR0005, HL 65112, RR024153, AT006694)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL65111, HL65112, P50HL065112, P50HL065111)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI066367, UL1 TR0005, AI066367)
  • National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (AT006694)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024153)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1 TR0005)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01AT006694, AT006694)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
hugging, perceived social support, stress buffering, upper respiratory tract infection, common cold, interpersonal conflict, infection susceptibility, disease severity, physical contact
MeSH terms
Adult, Disease Susceptibility, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Respiratory Tract Infections, Risk Factors, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review