CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 125Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttachment and Relationship DynamicsChild Therapy and Development

Improving parenting, child attachment, and externalizing behaviors: Meta-analysis of the first 25 randomized controlled trials on the effects of Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline

Open access
van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., Schuengel, Carlo, Wang, Qiang, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J.·2023·Development and Psychopathology
DOI 10.1017/s0954579421001462
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Improving parenting, child attachment, and externalizing behaviors: Meta-analysis of the first 25 randomized controlled trials on the effects of Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP-SD). VIPP-SD combines support of parental sensitive responsiveness with coaching parents in sensitive limit setting. Here, we present meta-analyses of 25 RCTs conducted with more than 2,000 parents and caregivers. Parents or children had various risks. We examined its effectiveness in promoting parental cognitions and behavior regarding sensitive parenting and limit setting, in promoting secure child–parent attachment, and reducing externalizing child behavior. Web of Science, MEDLINE, PubMed, and recent reviews were searched for relevant trials (until May 10, 2021). Multilevel meta-analysis with META, METAFOR, and DMETAR in R took account of the 3-level structure of the datasets (studies, participants, measures). The meta-analyses showed substantial combined effect sizes for parenting behavior ( r = .18) and attitudes ( r = .16), and for child attachment security ( r = .23), but not for child externalizing behavior ( r = .07). In the subset of studies examining effects on both parenting and attachment, the association between effect sizes for parenting and for attachment amounted to r = .48. We consider the way in which VIPP-SD uses video-feedback an active intervention component. Whether VIPP-SD indeed stimulates secure attachment through enhanced positive parenting remains an outstanding question for further experimental study and individual participant data meta-analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954579421001462

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Ainsworth, M. D. S., Bell, S. M., & Stayton, D. J. (1974). Infant-mother attach- ment and social development: Socialization as a product of reciprocal responsiveness to signals. In Richards M. P. M. (Ed.), The integration of a child into a social world (99-135). Cambridge University Press.
  2. Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Oosterman, M. (2021). Attachment-based interventions to promote secure attachment. In Thompson R. A., Simpson J. A., & Berlin L. J. (Eds.), Attachment. The fundamental questions (pp. 299- 306) Guilford.
  3. Barlow, J., Sembi, S., & Underdown, A. (2016). Pilot RCT of the use of Video Interaction Guidance with preterm babies. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. ISSN: 0264-6838 (Print) 1469-672X.
  4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.).
  5. Forgatch, M. S., & Patterson, G. R. (2010). Parent management training- Oregon model: An intervention for antisocial behavior in children and ado- lescents. Evidence-Based Psychotherapies for Children and Adolescents, In Weisz, J. R., & Kazdin, A. E. (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for chil- dren and adolescents (pp. 159-177). The Guilford Press.
  6. Moss, E., Tarabulsy, G. M., Dubois-Comtois, K., Cyr, C., Bernier, A., & St- Laurent, D. (2018). The attachment video-feedback intervention program. Development and validation. In Steele H., & Steele M. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment-based interventions. Guilford Press.
  7. Sama-Miller, E., Lugo-Gil, Harding, J., Akers, L., & Coughlin, R. (2020). Home visiting evidence of effectiveness (HomeVEE) systematic review. OPRE, Washington, DC, OPRE Report 2020-151,
  8. Steele, H., & Steele, M. Eds (2018). Handbook of attachment-based interven- tions. Guilford Press.
  9. Van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1994). Process model of replication studies: On the relations between different types of replication. In van der Veer R., Van IJzendoorn M. H., & Valsiner J. (Eds.), Reconstructing the mind: Replicability in research on human development (pp. 57-70) Ablex Norwood.
  10. Van IJzendoorn, M. H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Juffer, F. (2005). Why less is more. From the Dodo Bird Verdict to evidence-based interventions on sensitivity and early attachments. In Berlin L., Ziv Y., Amaya-Jackson L., & Greenberg M. T. (Eds.), Enhancing early attachment: Theory, research, inter- vention, and policy. (pp. 297-312) Guilford Publications.
  11. Waters, E., Vaughn, B. E., Waters, H. S., Allen, J. P., & Bakkum, L. (2021). Measuring attachment developmental assessment across the Lifespan. Guilford Press.
  12. Webster-Stratton, C. (2015). The Incredible Years® series: A developmental approach. In Van Ryzin M. J., Kumpfer K. L., Fosco G. M., & Greenberg M. T. (Eds.), Family-based prevention programs for children and adolescents. (pp. 54-79) Psychology Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
van IJzendoorn, M. H., Schuengel, C., Wang, Q., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • Capital Normal University (CN)
  • Leiden University (NL)
ORCID
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2022-01-17
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
241-256
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
DOI
10.1017/s0954579421001462
OpenAlex
W4205847149
Cited by
116
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • ZonMw (641001103, 024.001.003)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (024‐001‐003)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
Keywords
video feedback, parenting support, parental sensitivity, limit setting, externalizing problems, parental responsiveness, parenting attitudes, child behavior problems
MeSH terms
Feedback, Humans, Parent-Child Relations, Video Recording, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Parenting, Feedback, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review