Cited by 328Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFamily and Disability Support ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Randomised trial of a parent-mediated intervention for infants at high risk for autism: longitudinal outcomes to age 3 years

Open access
Green, Jonathan, Pickles, Andrew, Pasco, Greg, Bedford, Rachael, Wan, Ming Wai, Elsabbagh, Mayada, Slonims, Vicky, Gliga, Teea +5 more·2017·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been increasing interest in the potential for pre-emptive interventions in the prodrome of autism, but little investigation as to their effect. METHODS: A two-site, two-arm assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a 12-session parent-mediated social communication intervention delivered between 9 and 14 months of age (Intervention in the British Autism Study of Infant Siblings-Video Interaction for Promoting Positive Parenting), against no intervention. Fifty-four infants (28 intervention, 26 nonintervention) at familial risk of autism but not otherwise selected for developmental atypicality were assessed at 9-month baseline, 15-month treatment endpoint, and 27- and 39-month follow-up. PRIMARY OUTCOME: severity of autism prodromal symptoms, blind-rated on Autism Observation Schedule for Infants or Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule 2nd Edition across the four assessment points. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: blind-rated parent-child interaction and child language; nonblind parent-rated communication and socialisation. Prespecified intention-to-treat analysis combined estimates from repeated measures within correlated regressions to estimate the overall effect of the infancy intervention over time. RESULTS: Effect estimates in favour of intervention on autism prodromal symptoms, maximal at 27 months, had confidence intervals (CIs) at each separate time point including the null, but showed a significant overall effect over the course of the intervention and follow-up period (effect size [ES] = 0.32; 95% CI 0.04, 0.60; p = .026). Effects on proximal intervention targets of parent nondirectiveness/synchrony (ES = 0.33; CI 0.04, 0.63; p = .013) and child attentiveness/communication initiation (ES = 0.36; 95% CI 0.04, 0.68; p = .015) showed similar results. There was no effect on categorical diagnostic outcome or formal language measures. CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up to 3 years of the first RCT of a very early social communication intervention for infants at familial risk of developing autism has shown a treatment effect, extending 24 months after intervention end, to reduce the overall severity of autism prodromal symptoms and enhance parent-child dyadic social communication over this period. We highlight the value of extended follow-up and repeat assessment for early intervention trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpp.12728

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If infants show warning signs of autism and intervention is provided, there is an improvement in symptomatology (milder signs of autism and increased social interaction).

    “If infants show warning signs of autism and intervention is provided, there is an improvement in symptomatology (milder signs of autism and increased social interaction).”

    From Mindfulness Parenting and Childish Play: A Clinical Trial With Parents of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders (2023) · cites this paper as Green et al., 2017

    The Methods state that infants were at familial risk of autism but were not selected for developmental atypicality, so the trial does not establish the claim specifically for infants already showing warning signs. The Results report reduced autism prodromal symptoms and improved child attentiveness and communication initiation over the intervention and follow-up period, though effects at individual time points were uncertain. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The improvement in symptomatology from early intervention manifests itself even years later.

    “This improvement manifests itself even years later (Green et al., 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P.C., Risi, S., Gotham, K., & Bishop, S. (2012). Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule‐2nd edition (ADOS‐2). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Corporation.
  2. O'Connell, M.E., Boat, T., & Warner, K.E. (2009). Committee on the Prevention of Mental Disorders and Substance Abuse among Children, Youth, and Young Adults, National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine: Progress and possibilities. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Green, J., Pickles, A., Pasco, G., Bedford, R., Wan, M. W., Elsabbagh, M., Slonims, V., Gliga, T., Jones, E., Cheung, C., Charman, T., Johnson, M., & The British Autism Study of Infant Siblings (BASIS) Team
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
  • Blind and Sight Impaired Society (GB)
Corresponding author
Green, Jonathan
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-04-10
Volume
58
Issue
12
Pages
1330-1340
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2605716357
Cited by
328
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 9
FWCI
22.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Autistica (7267)
  • Waterloo Foundation
  • Autism Speaks
  • Medical Research Council (G0701484, MR/K021389/1)
  • King’s College London
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, infant siblings, parent-mediated intervention, early intervention, social communication, parent-child interaction, child language, longitudinal follow-up
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child, Preschool, Communication, Education, Nonprofessional, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Language Development, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Single-Blind Method, Parenting, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Early Intervention, Educational, Prodromal Symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review