Cited by 243Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

WHAT IS THE THRESHOLD FOR A CLINICALLY RELEVANT EFFECT? THE CASE OF MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDERS: Theoretical Review: Threshold for a Clinically Relevant Effect

Open access
Cuijpers, Pim, Turner, Erick H., Koole, Sander L., van Dijke, Annemiek, Smit, Filip·2014·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials can show whether a treatment effect is statistically significant and can describe the size of the effect. There are, however, no validated methods available for establishing the clinical relevance of these outcomes. Recently, it was proposed that a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.50 be used as cutoff for clinical relevance in the treatment of depression. METHODS: We explore what the effect size means and why the size of an effect has little bearing on its clinical relevance. We will also examine how the "minimally important difference," as seen from the patient perspective, may be helpful in deciding where the cutoff for clinical relevance should be placed for a given condition. RESULTS: Effect sizes in itself cannot give an indication of the clinical relevance of an intervention because the outcome itself determines the clinical relevance and not only the size of the effects. The "minimal important difference" (MID) could be used as a starting point for pinpointing the cutoff for clinical relevance. A first, rough attempt to implement this approach for depression resulted in a tentative clinical relevance cutoff of SMD = 0.24. Using this cutoff, psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and combined treatment have effect sizes above this cutoff. DISCUSSION: Statistical outcomes cannot be equated with clinical relevance. The "MID" may be used for pinpointing the cutoff for clinical relevance, but more work in this area is needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.22249

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cuijpers, P., Turner, E. H., Koole, S. L., van Dijke, A., & Smit, F.
Affiliations
  • Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • Delta Psychiatrisch Centrum; Poortugaal The Netherlands
  • Trimbos Institute (NL)
Corresponding author
Cuijpers, Pim
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02-22
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
374-378
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165216655
Cited by
242
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4
FWCI
10.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
clinical relevance, effect size, standardized mean difference, minimal important difference, major depressive disorder, treatment effects, psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, combination therapy, outcome measurement
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Combined Modality Therapy, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Psychometrics, Psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review