The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors influencing human attitudes to animals and their welfare
Abstract
This paper reviews the literature on human attitudes to animals, and postulates the existence of two primary motivational determinants of attitudes labelled ‘affect’ and ‘utility’. It also proposes that the relative strengths of these key attitude dimensions are affected by various modifying variables including the specific attributes of the animal, the individual characteristics and experience of the person evaluating the animal, and a range of cultural factors. The role of science as a cultural modifier of human attitudes to animals is also discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For more than 40 years, studies have shown that the human–animal relationship, especially that with domestic and companion animals, is the result of a complex interactions between biological, psychological, social and cultural factors [12,13,14,15,16,17].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“Serpell [12] suggests that the relative strength of these factors would depend on individual characteristics, experience, cultural factors and also on the specific attributes of animals.”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“In addition, sociodemographic variables, such as gender, age, family structure, education level and previous experiences with animals, play a role [8,12,13,28,29,30].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“According to [12], two main aspects underlie human attitudes toward animals: “affect”, which can be defined as people’s affective and emotional responses to animals, and “utility”, i.e., people’s perceptions of animals’ instrumental value.”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“Regarding animal characteristics, people generally do not see all animals as equal, as their physical and behavioral traits play a role in how they are perceived, considered and treated [12,17,51].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“These factors appear to be linked and influence each other, affecting people’s attitudes and beliefs towards animals and the way they are considered, treated and cared for [12,13,27,60,61].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cites
Dawkins, M. S. (1980) · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-5905-7 · Cited by 379
Research works printed but not linked: 66
- Kellert, 1980, American attitudes toward and knowledge of animals: an update, International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems, 1, 87
- Harris, 1978, Cannibals and Kings
- KirkWood, 2001, Animal consciousness, cognition and welfare, Animal Welfare, 10, 55, 10.1017/S0962728600023472 · DOI
- 10.1163/156853098X00014 · DOI
- Douglas, 1966, Purity and Danger
- 10.1163/156853093X00028 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279391787057170 · DOI
- Leach, 1964, New Direction in the Study of Language, 23
- 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00910.x · DOI
- Loh, 2000, Living Planet Report 2000
- Webster, 1994, Animal Welfare: a Cool Eye Towards Eden
- 10.4159/9780674045231 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279397787000950 · DOI
- Levi-Strauss, 1966, The Savage Mind
- 10.1007/978-94-024-0980-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2752/089279389787058091 · DOI
- HarWood, 1928, Love of Animals and How it Developed in Great Britain
- Serpell, 1985, The Human-Pet Relationship, 112
- Serpell, 1994, Animals and Human Society: Changing Perspectives, 127
- 10.2752/089279394787002041 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279392787011575 · DOI
- 10.1163/156853003321618864 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2752/089279393787002105 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279399787000471 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279302786992766 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279395787156347 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2752/089279395787156338 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279302786992504 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00280-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Lawrence, 1989, Perceptions of Animals in American Culture, 57
- Baker, 1993, Picturing the Beast: Animals, Identity and Representation
- Serpell, 1986, In the Company of Animals
- 10.1163/156853099X00077 · DOI
- 10.1006/drev.1996.0430 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00908.x · DOI
- 10.2752/089279392787011476 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279301786999355 · DOI
- Maehle, 1994, Animals and Human Society: Changing Perspectives, 81
- Paul, 1993, Childhood pet keeping and humane attitudes in young adulthood, Animal Welfare, 2, 321, 10.1017/S0962728600016109 · DOI
- Kellert, 1980, Phase 111: Knowledge, Affection and Basic Attitudes Toward Animals in American Society
- 10.2752/089279301786999535 · DOI
- Broida, 1993, Personality differences between pro-and anti-vivisectionists, Society and Animals, 1, 129, 10.1163/156853093X00037 · DOI
- Marvin, 1988, Bullfight
- Rowan, 2001, The State of the Animals 2001, 111
- Serpell, 2000, The Domestic Cat: the Biology of its Behaviour, Second Edition, 180
- Burghardt, 1989, Perceptions of Animals in American Culture, 129
- Thomas, 1983, Animals and the Natural World: Changing Attitudes 1500-1800
- Glickman, 1995, The spotted hyena from Aristotle to the Lion King: reputation is everything, Social Research, 62, 501
- Dunayer, 1997, Animal Equality: Language and Liberation
- Morris, 1998, The Power of Animals: an Ethnography
- 10.2752/089279388787058317 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_8 · DOI
- 10.1163/156853094X00126 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279390787057784 · DOI
- Miura, 2002, Childhood experiences and attitudes towards animal issues: a comparison of young adults in Japan and the UK, Animal Welfare, 11, 437, 10.1017/S096272860002515X · DOI
- Serpell, 1993, Science and the Human-Animal Relationship, 39
- 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00907.x · DOI · Paper page
- Gould, 1979, Mickey Mouse meets Konrad Lorenz, Natural History, 88, 30
- 10.1017/CBO9781139172967 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2752/089279394787001772 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279398787000742 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279390787057702 · DOI
- 10.1163/156853097X00060 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279300786999699 · DOI · Paper page
- Serpell, 1995, The Domestic Dog, 245
- Kellert, 1993a, The Biophilia Hypothesis, 42
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prato-Previde, E., Basso Ricci, E., & Colombo, E. S. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12202835 · Cited by 121
The human and animal baby schema effect: correlates of individual differences.
Lehmann, V., Huis in‘t Veld, E. M. J., & Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M. (2013) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2013.01.001 · Cited by 114
Connecting animal and human cognition to conservation
Marzluff, J. M., & Swift, K. N. (2017) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.04.005 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Serpell, J.
- Venue
- Animal Welfare
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S145-S151
- ISSN
- 0962-7286
- 2054-1538
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
