Cited by 29Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsPain Management and Placebo Effect

Change in agitation in Alzheimer's disease in the placebo arm of a nine-week controlled trial

Open access
Rosenberg, Paul B., Drye, Lea T., Porsteinsson, Anton P., Pollock, Bruce G., Devanand, D.P., Frangakis, Constantine, Ismail, Zahinoor, Marano, Christopher +11 more·2015·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Placebo responses raise significant challenges for the design of clinical trials. We report changes in agitation outcomes in the placebo arm of a recent trial of citalopram for agitation in Alzheimer's disease (CitAD). METHODS: In the CitAD study, all participants and caregivers received a psychosocial intervention and 92 were assigned to placebo for nine weeks. Outcomes included Neurobehavioral Rating Scale agitation subscale (NBRS-A), modified AD Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC), Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI), the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Agitation/Aggression domain (NPI A/A) and Total (NPI-Total) and ADLs. Continuous outcomes were analyzed with mixed-effects modeling and dichotomous outcomes with logistic regression. RESULTS: Agitation outcomes improved over nine weeks: NBRS-A mean (SD) decreased from 7.8 (3.0) at baseline to 5.4 (3.2), CMAI from 28.7 (6.7) to 26.7 (7.4), NPI A/A from 8.0 (2.4) to 4.9 (3.8), and NPI-Total from 37.3 (17.7) to 28.4 (22.1). The proportion of CGI-C agitation responders ranged from 21 to 29% and was significantly different from zero. MMSE improved from 14.4 (6.9) to 15.7 (7.2) and ADLs similarly improved. Most of the improvement was observed by three weeks and was sustained through nine weeks. The major predictor of improvement in each agitation measure was a higher baseline score in that measure. CONCLUSIONS: We observed significant placebo response which may be due to regression to the mean, response to a psychosocial intervention, natural course of symptoms, or nonspecific benefits of participation in a trial.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610215001106

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lack of diagnostic precision in these trials may contribute to commonly observed challenges including robust placebo responses and failure of placebo groups to decline.

    “Lack of diagnostic precision in these trials may contribute to commonly observed challenges including robust placebo responses and failure of placebo groups to decline. 24 , 25”

    From Alzheimer’s disease drug development pipeline: 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [25]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. APA Work Group on Alzheimer's Disease and other Dementias Rabins PV Blacker D Rovner BW Rummans T Schneider LS Tariot PN Blass DM Steering Committee on Practice Guidelines McIntyre JS Charles SC Anzia DJ Cook IA Finnerty MT Johnson BR Nininger JE Schneidman B Summergrad P Woods SM Berger J Cross CD Brandt HA Margolis PM Shemo JPD Blinder BJ Duncan DL Barnovitz MA Carino AJ Freyberg ZZ Gray SH Tonnu T Kunkle R Albert AB Craig TJ Regier DA Fochtmann LJ 2007 American Psychiatric Association practice guideline for the treatment of patients with Alzheimer's disease and other dementias Second The American journal of psychiatry 5 56

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosenberg, P. B., Drye, L. T., Porsteinsson, A. P., Pollock, B. G., Devanand, D. P., Frangakis, C., Ismail, Z., Marano, C., Meinert, C. L., Mintzer, J. E., Munro, C. A., Pelton, G., Rabins, P. V., Schneider, L. S., Shade, D. M., Weintraub, D., Newell, J., Yesavage, J., & Lyketsos, C. G.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Centers (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Rosenberg, Paul B.
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
27
Issue
12
Pages
2059-2067
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2395421378
Cited by
28
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (P50, AG05142)
  • National Institute on Aging
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01AG031348)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, agitation, placebo response, citalopram, regression to the mean, psychosocial interventions, neuropsychiatric symptoms, activities of daily living, clinical trial design
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aggression, Alzheimer Disease, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychomotor Agitation, Severity of Illness Index, Citalopram, Placebo Effect, Treatment Outcome, Caregivers, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review