Cited by 53Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Mibampator (LY451395) randomized clinical trial for agitation/aggression in Alzheimer's disease

Open access
Trzepacz, Paula T., Cummings, Jeffrey, Konechnik, Thomas, Forrester, Tammy D., Chang, Curtis, Dennehy, Ellen B., Willis, Brian A., Shuler, Catherine +2 more·2013·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mibampator, an amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptor potentiator, was evaluated for treatment of agitation and aggression (A/A) in Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: Outpatients (n = 132) with probable AD and A/A randomized to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with 3-mg po mibampator or placebo were assessed using the 4-domain A/A subscale of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-4-A/A) derived from the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. Secondary measures included the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory, Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia, Frontal Systems Behavior Inventory (FrSBe), and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive. Efficacy was analyzed using mixed-effects model repeated measures from baseline to endpoint. Adverse events (AEs), labs, vital signs, and electrocardiograms were monitored. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Both groups improved on the NPI-4-A/A, but without group differences. Among secondaries, mibampator was significantly better (p = 0.007) than placebo only on the FrSBe. AEs were similar between groups. One death occurred in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Possible explanations for no significant group differences include caregiver, drug target engagement, and design issues. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov; ID: NCT00843518.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610212002141

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AMPAR PAMs appeared well-tolerated in early-phase clinical trials, but failures to improve cognition and mood have consistently been observed.

    “While AMPAR PAMs appeared to be well-tolerated in earlyphase clinical trials, failures to improve cognition and mood have consistently been observed [201,202]”

    From Ketamine in neuropsychiatric disorders: an update (2024) · cites this paper as [202]

    The Results (Safety evaluation; page not provided) say mibampator was well tolerated. The Results (Efficacy; page not provided) report no treatment-group advantage on the cognitive measure or depression scale, although apathy improved significantly with mibampator. This trial of one AMPA receptor potentiator does not establish that failures to improve cognition and mood were consistently observed across AMPAR PAMs. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trzepacz, P. T., Cummings, J., Konechnik, T., Forrester, T. D., Chang, C., Dennehy, E. B., Willis, B. A., Shuler, C., Tabas, L. B., & Lyketsos, C.
Affiliations
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Trzepacz, Paula T.
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
707-719
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084820245
Cited by
53
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • National Institute on Aging (P50AG005146)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, agitation, aggression, NMDA receptor antagonists, neuropsychiatric symptoms, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, depression in dementia, adverse events
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aggression, Alzheimer Disease, Biphenyl Compounds, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Outpatients, Psychomotor Agitation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sulfonamides, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review