Cited by 100Psychiatry, Mental Health, NeuroscienceAging and Gerontology ResearchEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Beyond artificial intelligence: exploring artificial wisdom

Open access
Jeste, Dilip V., Graham, Sarah A., Nguyen, Tanya T., Depp, Colin A., Lee, Ellen E., Kim, Ho-Cheol·2020·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ultimate goal of artificial intelligence (AI) is to develop technologies that are best able to serve humanity. This will require advancements that go beyond the basic components of general intelligence. The term "intelligence" does not best represent the technological needs of advancing society, because it is "wisdom", rather than intelligence, that is associated with greater well-being, happiness, health, and perhaps even longevity of the individual and the society. Thus, the future need in technology is for artificial wisdom (AW). METHODS: We examine the constructs of human intelligence and human wisdom in terms of their basic components, neurobiology, and relationship to aging, based on published empirical literature. We review the development of AI as inspired and driven by the model of human intelligence, and consider possible governing principles for AW that would enable humans to develop computers which can operationally utilize wise principles and result in wise acts. We review relevant examples of current efforts to develop such wise technologies. RESULTS: AW systems will be based on developmental models of the neurobiology of human wisdom. These AW systems need to be able to a) learn from experience and self-correct; b) exhibit compassionate, unbiased, and ethical behaviors; and c) discern human emotions and help the human users to regulate their emotions and make wise decisions. CONCLUSIONS: A close collaboration among computer scientists, neuroscientists, mental health experts, and ethicists is necessary for developing AW technologies, which will emulate the qualities of wise humans and thus serve the greatest benefit to humanity. Just as human intelligence and AI have helped further the understanding and usefulness of each other, human wisdom and AW can aid in promoting each other's growth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610220000927

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The development of AW necessitates close collaborations by computer scientists, neuroscientists, mental health experts, and ethicists.

    “The development of AW necessitates the close and prudent collaborations by computer scientists, neuroscientists, mental health experts, and ethicists that collectively provide the greatest benefits to humanity (Jeste et al., 2020).”
  • The future need in AI technology is for artificial wisdom (AW) not artificial intelligence.

    “Jeste et al. (2020) contend that the future need in AI technology is for artificial wisdom (AW) not artificial intelligence”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Asimov Isaac (1950). “Runaround”. Robot I (The Isaac Asimov Collection ed.). New York City: Doubleday. p. 40. ISBN 0-385-42304-7.
  2. Minsky ML. Logical versus analogical or symbolic versus connectionist or neat versus scruffy. AI magazine. 1991 6 15; 12(2): 34-. DOI: 10.1609/aimag.v12i2.894 · DOI
  3. Wechsler D (2008). Wechsler adult intelligence scale fourth edition: Technical interpretive manual. San Antonio: NCS Pearson.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeste, D. V., Graham, S. A., Nguyen, T. T., Depp, C. A., Lee, E. E., & Kim, H.-C.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • IBM Research - Almaden (US)
Corresponding author
Jeste, Dilip V.
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
32
Issue
8
Pages
993-1001
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3038047461
Cited by
100
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • Sam and Rose Stein Institute for Research on Aging
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH019934, R01MH094151-01, K23MH118435-01A1, K23MH119375-01)
  • University of California, San Diego
  • IBM Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
artificial wisdom, artificial intelligence, human wisdom, human intelligence, aging, emotion regulation, ethical AI, self-correction, interdisciplinary collaboration
MeSH terms
Aging, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Intelligence, Longevity, Neurobiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review