Cited by 69Resilience and Mental HealthAging and Gerontology ResearchPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

A pragmatic trial of a group intervention in senior housing communities to increase resilience

Open access
Treichler, Emily B.H., Glorioso, Danielle, Lee, Ellen E., Wu, Tsung-Chin, Tu, Xin M., Daly, Rebecca, O’Brien, Catherine, Smith, Jennifer L. +1 more·2020·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aging is associated with numerous stressors that negatively impact older adults' well-being. Resilience improves ability to cope with stressors and can be enhanced in older adults. Senior housing communities are promising settings to deliver positive psychiatry interventions due to rising resident populations and potential impact of delivering interventions directly in the community. However, few intervention studies have been conducted in these communities. We present a pragmatic stepped-wedge trial of a novel psychological group intervention intended to improve resilience among older adults in senior housing communities. DESIGN: A pragmatic modified stepped-wedge trial design. SETTING: Five senior housing communities in three states in the US. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-nine adults over age 60 years residing in independent living sector of senior housing communities. INTERVENTION: Raise Your Resilience, a manualized 1-month group intervention that incorporated savoring, gratitude, and engagement in value-based activities, administered by unlicensed residential staff trained by researchers. There was a 1-month control period and a 3-month post-intervention follow-up. MEASUREMENTS: Validated self-report measures of resilience, perceived stress, well-being, and wisdom collected at months 0 (baseline), 1 (pre-intervention), 2 (post-intervention), and 5 (follow-up). RESULTS: Treatment adherence and satisfaction were high. Compared to the control period, perceived stress and wisdom improved from pre-intervention to post-intervention, while resilience improved from pre-intervention to follow-up. Effect sizes were small in this sample, which had relatively high baseline resilience. Physical and mental well-being did not improve significantly, and no significant moderators of change in resilience were identified. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates feasibility of conducting pragmatic intervention trials in senior housing communities. The intervention resulted in significant improvement in several measures despite ceiling effects. The study included several features that suggest high potential for its implementation and dissemination across similar communities nationally. Future studies are warranted, particularly in samples with lower baseline resilience or in assisted living facilities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610219002096

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [30]Jeste DV, Childers J: Strategic Planning for Transformative Senior Living: Developing Tomorrow’s Leadership and Workforce. Seniors Housing & Care Journal. 2017 Vol 25 (1): 113– 126.
  2. [35]Short JL. Psychological Fitness for Older Adults: A Pilot Intervention. Seniors Housing & Care Journal. 2012; 20: 71– 84.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Treichler, E. B. H., Glorioso, D., Lee, E. E., Wu, T.-C., Tu, X. M., Daly, R., O’Brien, C., Smith, J. L., & Jeste, D. V.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Jeste, Dilip V.
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
173-182
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005314740
Cited by
69
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH019934, R01MH094151-01)
  • University of California, San Diego
  • Sam and Rose Stein Institute for Research on Aging
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
resilience, older adults, group intervention, positive psychiatry, savoring, gratitude, wisdom, perceived stress, well-being, independent living, community-based intervention, intervention feasibility
MeSH terms
Healthy Aging, Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Group, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, United States, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Housing for the Elderly, Resilience, Psychological, Independent Living, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review