Cited by 40Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Identifying functional cognitive disorder: a proposed diagnostic risk model

Open access
McWhirter, Laura, Ritchie, Craig, Stone, Jon, Carson, Alan·2022·CNS Spectrums

Abstract

Background: Functional cognitive disorders (FCD) are an important differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease. The utility of suggested diagnostic features has not been prospectively explored in “real world” clinical populations. This study aimed to identify positive clinical markers of FCD. Methods: Adults with cognitive complaints but not dementia were recruited from memory, neurology, and neuropsychiatry clinics. Participants underwent structured interview, Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Luria 3-step, interlocking fingers, digit span and Medical Symptom Validity Test, Patient Health Questionnaire 15, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory. Potential diagnostic variables were tested against expert consensus diagnosis using logistic regression. Results: FCD were identified in 31/49 participants. Participants with FCD were younger, spoke for longer when prompted “Tell me about the problems you’ve been having,” and had more anxiety and depression symptoms and psychiatric diagnoses than those without FCD. There were no significant differences in sex, education, or cognitive scores. Younger age and longer spoken response predicted FCD diagnosis in a model which explained 74% of diagnostic variability and had an area under the curve (AUC) of 94%. Conclusions: A detailed description of cognitive failure is a sensitive and specific positive feature of FCD, demonstrating internal inconsistency between experienced and observed function. Cognitive and performance validity tests appear less helpful in FCD diagnosis. People with FCD are not “worried well” but often perform poorly on tests, and have more anxiety, depression, and physical symptoms than people with other cognitive disorders. Identifying diagnostic profiles is an important step toward parity of esteem for FCDs, as differential diagnoses of neurodegenerative disease and an independent target for clinical trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1092852921000845

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Health anxiety about dementia is a common concern among people with FCD.

    “those participants who experienced health anxiety about dementia, which is a common concern among people with FCD (1)”

    From A qualitative analysis of patients' day-to-day living with functional cognitive disorder (FCD). (2025) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Introduction (p. 5) lists health anxiety about dementia as a presentation of FCD, supporting its association with the disorder. It does not establish how common that specific concern is among people with FCD; the higher anxiety scores reported under Psychiatric symptoms and diagnoses (p. 10) are not specific to dementia. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McWhirter, L., Ritchie, C., Stone, J., & Carson, A.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
McWhirter, Laura
Venue
CNS Spectrums
Published
2021-09-17
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
754-763
ISSN
  • 1092-8529 (ISSN-L)
  • 2165-6509
OpenAlex
W3199516084
Cited by
40
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CNS Spectrums (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
functional cognitive disorder, differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases, anxiety and depression, psychiatric comorbidity, performance validity, cognitive failure, diagnostic biomarkers
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review