Cited by 24Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Perspectives on the diagnosis and management of functional cognitive disorder: An international Delphi study

Open access
Cabreira, Verónica, Alty, Jane, Antic, Sonja, Araújo, Rui, Aybek, Selma, Ball, Harriet A., Baslet, Gaston, Bhome, Rohan +40 more·2025·European Journal of Neurology

Abstract

Background: Current proposed criteria for functional cognitive disorder (FCD) have not been externally validated. We sought to analyse the current perspectives of cognitive specialists in the diagnosis and management of FCD in comparison with neurodegenerative conditions. Methods: International experts in cognitive disorders were invited to assess seven illustrative clinical vignettes containing history and bedside characteristics alone. Participants assigned a probable diagnosis and selected the appropriate investigation and treatment. Qualitative, quantitative and inter‐rater agreement analyses were undertaken. Results: Eighteen diagnostic terminologies were assigned by 45 cognitive experts from 12 countries with a median of 13 years of experience, across the seven scenarios. Accurate discrimination between FCD and neurodegeneration was observed, independently of background and years of experience: 100% of the neurodegenerative vignettes were correctly classified and 75%–88% of the FCD diagnoses were attributed to non‐neurodegenerative causes. There was <50% agreement in the terminology used for FCD, in comparison with 87%–92% agreement for neurodegenerative syndromes. Blood tests and neuropsychological evaluation were the leading diagnostic modalities for FCD. Diagnostic communication, psychotherapy and psychiatry referral were the main suggested management strategies in FCD. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the feasibility of distinguishing between FCD and neurodegeneration based on relevant patient characteristics and history details. These characteristics need further validation and operationalisation. Heterogeneous labelling and framing pose clinical and research challenges reflecting a lack of agreement in the field. Careful consideration of FCD diagnosis is advised, particularly in the presence of comorbidities. This study informs future research on diagnostic tools and evidence‐based interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ene.16318

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is recommended that treatment begin with being informed of the diagnosis and signposted to psychoeducational materials.

    “Currently, it is recommended that treatment begin with being informed of the diagnosis, which we found was done inconsistently, and signposted to psychoeducational materials (8, 38).”

    From A qualitative analysis of patients' day-to-day living with functional cognitive disorder (FCD). (2025) · cites this paper as [38]

    In Results > Treatment and follow-up (page unavailable), participants emphasise communicating the diagnosis and explaining symptoms and memory functioning. The Discussion > Position statement also calls for education elements in treatment plans. Neither passage specifies that treatment should begin with diagnosis disclosure or that patients should be signposted to psychoeducational materials. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cabreira, V., Alty, J., Antic, S., Araújo, R., Aybek, S., Ball, H. A., Baslet, G., Bhome, R., Coebergh, J., Dubois, B., Edwards, M., Filipović, S. R., Frederiksen, K. S., Harbo, T., Hayhow, B., Howard, R., Huntley, J., Isaacs, J., LaFrance, W. C., Larner, A. J., Di Lorenzo, F., Main, J., Mallam, E., Marra, C., Massano, J., McGrath, E. R., McWhirter, L., Moreira, I. P., Nobili, F., Pennington, C., Tábuas‐Pereira, M., Perez, D. L., Popkirov, S., Rayment, D., Rossor, M., Russo, M., Santana, I., Schott, J., Scott, E. P., Taipa, R., Tinazzi, M., Tomic, S., Toniolo, S., Tørring, C. W., Wilkinson, T., Frostholm, L., Stone, J., & Carson, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • Department of Neurology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • University of Fribourg (CH)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
  • Sorbonne Université (FR)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Belgrade (RS)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
  • Department of Neurology Fiona Stanley Hospital Murdoch Western Australia Australia
  • University College London (GB)
  • Alpert Medical School Brown University Providence Rhode Island USA
  • Walton Centre (GB)
  • Department of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS Rome Italy
  • Devon Partnership NHS Trust (GB)
  • North Bristol NHS Trust (GB)
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
  • Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia (PT)
  • Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT)
  • NHS Lothian (GB)
  • Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra (PT)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Essen University Hospital (DE)
  • Southmead Hospital (GB)
  • University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
  • Centro de Inovação em Biomedicina e Biotecnologia (PT)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Hospital de Santo António (PT)
  • Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement University of Verona Verona Italy
  • Department of Neurology University Hospital Center Osijek, Medical School on University of Osijek Osijek Croatia
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Cabreira, Verónica
Venue
European Journal of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-05-03
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
e16318-e16318
ISSN
  • 1351-5101 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-1331
OpenAlex
W4396625210
Cited by
24
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • St George's Online Research Archive (St George's University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline@ND (The University of Notre Dame) (submittedVersion)
  • Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RIMI (Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
European Commission (956673)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
functional cognitive disorder, diagnosis, management, neurodegenerative diseases, differential diagnosis, diagnostic criteria, diagnostic terminology, clinical vignettes, interobserver agreement, neuropsychological assessment, blood analysis, psychotherapy, psychiatric referral, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition Disorders, Delphi Technique, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Neurodegenerative Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review