Cited by 43Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPsychological Testing and Assessment

Clinical signs in functional cognitive disorders: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis

Open access
Cabreira, Verónica, Frostholm, Lisbeth, McWhirter, Laura, Stone, Jon, Carson, Alan·2023·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Functional cognitive disorder (FCD) accounts for around a third of patients attending specialized memory clinics. It is also overrepresented in patients with other functional and somatic diagnoses. So far, no long-term diagnostic validity studies were conducted, and a positive diagnostic profile is yet to be identified. We aimed to review the literature on diagnostic signs and symptoms that allow for a discrimination between FCD and neurodegeneration. METHODS: Systematic review of Ovid-Medline®, Embase and PsycINFO databases. Relevant clinical features were extracted including demographics, symptom history, comorbidities, language and interaction profiles and cognitive assessments. Studies with quantifiable diagnostic accuracy data were included in a diagnostic meta-analysis. RESULTS: Thirty studies (N = 8602) were included. FCD patients were younger, more educated, and more likely to have a family history of older onset dementia, abrupt symptom onset, and higher rates of anxiety, depression and sleep disturbance. Promising language profiles include longer duration of spoken answer, elaborated examples of memory failures, ability to answer compound and personal questions, and demonstration of working memory during interaction. The pooled analysis of clinical accuracy of different signs revealed that attending alone and bringing a handwritten list of problems particularly increase the odds of a FCD diagnosis. Current evidence from neuropsychometric studies in FCD is scarce. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review reinforces that positive signs contribute for an early differentiation between FCD and neurodegeneration in patients presenting with memory complaints. It is the first to attain quantitative value to clinical observations. These results will inform future diagnostic decision tools and intervention testing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111447

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite recent research efforts, it has been difficult to identify clear positive signs of FCD similar to the Hoover's sign in functional movement disorders.

    “Despite recent research efforts (6), it has been difficult to identify clear positive signs of FCD similar to the Hoover's sign in functional movement disorders.”
  • Despite some recent exceptions, FCD lags behind in this regard and too many clinicians in memory clinics are wary of the diagnosis and its plethora of confusing synonyms, which can hinder research.

    “However, despite some recent exceptions (6, 33, 37) FCD lags behind in this regard and too many clinicians in memory clinics are wary of the diagnosis and its plethora of confusing synonyms (8), which can hinder research (4).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. A.J. Larner, Screening utility of the attended alone sign for subjective memory impairment, Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 28 (4) (2014) 364-365, https://doi.org/ 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3182769b4f. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cabreira, V., Frostholm, L., McWhirter, L., Stone, J., & Carson, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Cabreira, Verónica
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
173
Pages
111447
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385566435
Cited by
43
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Union
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
functional cognitive disorder, differential diagnosis, neurodegeneration, memory impairment, clinical signs, diagnostic accuracy, language assessment, working memory, anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, memory clinics
MeSH terms
Cognition Disorders, Humans, Language, Comorbidity, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review