The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preclinical prediction of AD using neuropsychological tests
Abstract
Normals (N = 42) and patients with mild memory difficulty (N = 123) were given a neuropsychological test battery, and then followed annually for 3 years to determine which individuals developed sufficient functional change that they met clinical criteria for AD. Twenty-three of the 123 participants with mild memory difficulty converted to a diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) within 3 years of follow-up. Four of the 20 neuropsychological measures obtained at baseline, were useful in discriminating the groups on the basis of their status 3 years after the tests were given. The 4 discriminating tests pertained to assessments of memory and executive function. When the controls were compared to the individuals with memory impairments who ultimately developed AD (the converters), the accuracy of discrimination was 89%, based on the neuropsychological measures at baseline. The discrimination of the controls from the individuals with mild memory problems who did not progress to the point where they met clinical criteria for probable AD over the 3 years of follow-up (the Questionables) was 74% and the discrimination of the questionables from the converters was 80%. The specific tests that contributed to these discriminations, in conjunction with recent neuropathological and neuroimaging data from preclinical cases, have implications for which brain regions may be affected during the prodromal phase of AD. (JINS, 2001, 7, 631–639.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
Mild Cognitive Impairment: Clinical Characterization and Outcome
Petersen, R. C., Smith, G. E., Waring, S. C., Ivnik, R. J., Tangalos, E. G., & Kokmen, E. (1999) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.56.3.303 · Cited by 8,980
Alzheimer's disease: cell-specific pathology isolates the hippocampal formation.
Hyman, B. T., Van Hoesen, G. W., Damasio, A. R., & Barnes, C. L. (1984) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6474172 · Cited by 2,268
Profound Loss of Layer II Entorhinal Cortex Neurons Occurs in Very Mild Alzheimer’s Disease
Gómez-Isla, T., Price, J. L., McKeel Jr., D. W., Morris, J. C., Growdon, J. H., & Hyman, B. T. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-14-04491.1996 · Cited by 1,796 · cited 3×
“, the neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic plaques) develop in the entorhinal cortex, a portion of the anterior parahippocampal gyrus which receives projections from widespread limbic and association areas and gives rise to the perforant pathway, the major cortical excitatory input to the hippocampus itself (Gomez-Isl…”
BackgroundInfluentialMild cognitive impairment in the elderly: Predictors of dementia
Flicker, C., Ferris, S. H., & Reisberg, B. (1991) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.41.7.1006 · Cited by 838
Ball, M. J. (1977) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00692056 · Cited by 639
Utility of the Apolipoprotein E Genotype in the Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease
Mayeux, R., Saunders, A. M., Shea, S., Mirra, S., Evans, D., Roses, A. D., Hyman, B. T., Crain, B., Tang, M.-X., & Phelps, C. H. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199802193380804 · Cited by 547
Preclinical prediction of Alzheimer's disease using SPECT
Johnson, K. A., Jones, K., Holman, B. L., Becker, J. A., Spiers, P. A., Satlin, A., & Albert, M. S. (1998) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.50.6.1563 · Cited by 471
Self-citationNeuropsychological detection and characterization of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease
Jacobs, D. M., Sano, M., Dooneief, G., Marder, K., Bell, K. L., & Stern, Y. (1995) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.45.5.957 · Cited by 409
Cited by
Cognitive impairment in preclinical Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis
Bäckman, L., Jones, S., Berger, A.-K., Laukka, E. J., & Small, B. J. (2005) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.19.4.520 · Cited by 735
Jack, C. R., Knopman, D. S., Weigand, S. D., Wiste, H. J., Vemuri, P., Lowe, V., Kantarci, K., Gunter, J. L., Senjem, M. L., Ivnik, R. J., et al. (2012) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.22628 · Cited by 602
Implementation of subjective cognitive decline criteria in research studies
Molinuevo, J. L., Rabin, L. A., Amariglio, R., Buckley, R., Dubois, B., Ellis, K. A., Ewers, M., Hampel, H., Klöppel, S., Rami, L., et al. (2017) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.09.012 · Cited by 575
Language performance in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: A comparative review
Taler, V., & Phillips, N. A. (2008) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803390701550128 · Cited by 529
Subjective cognitive complaints and amyloid burden in cognitively normal older individuals
Amariglio, R. E., Becker, J. A., Carmasin, J., Wadsworth, L. P., Lorius, N., Sullivan, C., Maye, J. E., Gidicsin, C., Pepin, L. C., Sperling, R. A., et al. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.08.011 · Cited by 472
Metadata
- Authors
- ALBERT, M. S., MOSS, M. B., TANZI, R., & JONES, K.
- Venue
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 631-639
- ISSN
- 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7661
- OpenAlex
- W2102544039
- Cited by
- 519
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 9.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
