Cited by 92Sodium Intake and HealthNutritional Studies and DietBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Daily sodium consumption and CVD mortality in the general population: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

Open access
Poggio, Rosana, Gutierrez, Laura, Matta, María G, Elorriaga, Natalia, Irazola, Vilma, Rubinstein, Adolfo·2015·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the present study was to determine whether elevated dietary Na intake could be associated with CVD mortality. Design: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies representing the general population. The adjusted relative risks and their 95 % confidence intervals were pooled by the inverse variance method using random-effects models. Heterogeneity, publication bias, subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed. Settings: MEDLINE (since 1973), Embase (since 1975), the Cochrane Library (since 1976), ISI Web of Science, Google Scholar (until September 2013) and secondary referencing were searched for inclusion in the study. Subject: Eleven prospective studies with 229 785 participants and average follow-up period of 13·37 years (range 5·5–19 years). Results: Higher Na intake was significantly associated with higher CVD mortality (relative risk=1·12; 95 % CI 1·06, 1·19). In the sensitivity analysis, the exclusion of studies with important relative weights did not significantly affect the results (relative risk=1·08; 95 % CI 1·01, 1·15). The meta-regression analysis showed that for every increase of 10 mmol/d in Na intake, CVD mortality increased significantly by 1 % (P=0·016). Age, hypertensive status and length of follow-up were also associated with increased CVD mortality. Conclusions: Higher Na intake was associated with higher CVD mortality in the general population; this result suggests a reduction in Na intake to prevent CVD mortality from any cause.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1368980014000949

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poggio, R., Gutierrez, L., Matta, M. G., Elorriaga, N., Irazola, V., & Rubinstein, A.
Affiliations
Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (AR)
Corresponding author
Poggio, Rosana
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2014-05-22
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
695-704
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W2133722050
Cited by
92
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
sodium intake, cardiovascular mortality, salt intake, hypertension, sodium reduction, cardiovascular risk factors
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Prospective Studies, Sodium, Dietary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review